Subsection 251(1) - Arm’s length
Paragraph 251(1)(a)
See Also
Kiperchuk v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1088 [at 486], 2013 TCC 60
The taxpayer was the designated beneficiary of her husband's RRSP, and received the RRSP proceeds upon his death, and was assessed for his unpaid...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 160 - Subsection 160(1) | 260 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(b) | 94 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(c) | transfer time was relevant time | 185 |
Hickman v. The Queen, 2000 DTC 2584 (TCC)
The taxpayer disposed of shares of a corporation to another corporation (“CSC”) all of whose shares were held by a family trust whose trustees...
Wright Estate v. The Queen, 96 DTC 1509 (TCC)
The taxpayer was an estate whose executors and trustees were the son (John) and accountant (Gordon) of the deceased. Gordon had married the widow...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(c) | testamentary trust dealt at arm's lenght with three beneficiaries (2 of them, administrators) who did not get along | 97 |
Administrative Policy
S1-F5-C1 - Related Persons and Dealing at Arm's Length
Trust can be related to persons who are related to its trustee
1.47 Subsection 104(1) provides that a reference to a trust is to be read to...
Paragraph 251(1)(b)
See Also
Kiperchuk v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1088 [at 486], 2013 TCC 60
The taxpayer was the designated beneficiary of her husband's RRSP, and received the RRSP proceeds upon his death, and was assessed for his unpaid...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 160 - Subsection 160(1) | 260 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(a) | taxpayer was not related to her deceased husband | 110 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(c) | transfer time was relevant time | 185 |
Articles
Jeffrey T. Love, Kenneth R. Hauser, "How Various Aggregation Rules Apply to Trusts", 2018 Conference Report (Canadian Tax Foundation), 28: 1-79
CRA application of s. 251(1)(b) (p. 28:52)
The CRA considered the application of paragraph 251(1)(b) to a situation in which a person was a...
Paragraph 251(1)(c)
Cases
Carter v. The King, 2024 TCC 71
The appellant, her cousin (“McAllister”) and her father held 40%, 40% and 20% of the common shares of Brown’s Paving Ltd. (“BPL”),...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | s. 84.1 did not apply to a sale of the taxpayer’s Opco shares to her cousin’s holdco for cash funded by an Opco dividend | 442 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 186 - Subsection 186(2) | no evidence that controlling shareholder of Opco did not deal at arm’s length with the holding company which was alleged to control Opco under s. 186(2) | 136 |
Canada (The King) v. MICROBJO PROPERTIES INC., 2023 FCA 157
The taxpayers, who were holding companies for partnerships that had recently agreed to sell their farmlands to third parties, were approached by...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 160 - Subsection 160(1) | a transaction that split, on the purchaser’s terms, a tax savings purportedly generated by it, was a non-arm’s length transaction | 701 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(3) | taxpayers did not intend to avoid (and were oblivious to) s. 160 | 265 |
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Interpretation Act - Subsection 45(2) | subsequent amendment confirmed the prior state of the law | 82 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 160 - Subsection 160(5) | s. 160(5) did not change the prior view that prior facts could be taken into account | 96 |
Keybrand Foods Inc. v. Canada, 2020 FCA 201
The taxpayer (“Keybrand”), its wholly-owning parent (“BWS”), and another Strassburger-family company were guarantors of loans made to a...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 20 - Subsection 20(1) - Paragraph 20(1)(c) - Subparagraph 20(1)(c)(i) | interest was non-deductible on loan made to company that had no reasonable prospects of recovery | 335 |
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Purpose/Intention | regard can be had to subsequent steps as confirmatory of the intent at the relevant time | 187 |
Louie v. Canada, 2019 FCA 255
From May 15 to October 17, 2009, the taxpayer directed 71 “swaps” under which TSX-listed shares were transferred between her self-directed...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 207.01 - Subsection 207.01(1) - Advantage - Paragraph (b) - Subparagraph (b)(i) | advantages generated in Year 1 from swap transactions continued to produce indirect advantages thereafter | 547 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 207.06 - Subsection 207.06(2) | concerns about future value increases are intended to be addressed by relief provisions | 384 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 248 - Subsection 248(10) | no necessity for predetermined endpoint or advance determination of price | 211 |
Aeronautic Development Corporation v. Canada, 2018 FCA 67
A Canadian corporation (ADC), which had issued voting common shares (representing voting control) for a modest amount to three Canadian employees,...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(5.1) | non-resident exercised de facto control of mooted CCPC under a development agreement | 646 |
Canada v. 9101-2310 Québec Inc., 2013 DTC 5172 [at 6455], 2013 FCA 241
In order to defeat a claim of a bank, a tax debtor ("Garneau") deposited $305,000 with a corporation ("2310") (whose shareholder, Mr. Pratte, was...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 160 - Subsection 160(1) | transfer only of legal title may engage s. 160 | 200 |
Sheldon Inwentash and Lynn Factor Charitable Foundation v. Canada, 2012 FCA 136
In the course of finding that a trust, which was a charitable foundation, did not qualify as a public foundation as it had a single trustee (a...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 149.1 - Subsection 149.1(1) - Public Foundation | 114 | |
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Interpretation Act - Subsection 33(2) | contrary intention evident | 99 |
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Ordinary Meaning | clear words dominate | 137 |
Labow v. Canada, 2012 DTC 5001 [at 6501], 2011 FCA 305
In finding that the taxpayer, who employed his wife in his medical practice, did not deal at arm's length with an employee health trust which he...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - 101-110 - Section 108 - Subsection 108(1) - Trust - Paragraph (a.1) | 213 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 75 - Subsection 75(3) | 213 |
Canada v. Remai, 2009 DTC 5188 [at 6257], 2009 FCA 340
In order to make promissory notes that he had donated to a charitable foundation cease to be non-qualifying securities, the taxpayer arranged for...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(4) | no abuse in controlling funds established | 159 |
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Redundancy/reading in words | provision not to be interpreted such that it can never apply | 40 |
Canada v. McLarty, 2008 DTC 6354, 2008 SCC 26, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 79
In finding that an acquisition of seismic data by the taxpayer, acting through the vendor ("Compton") as his agent, was an arm's length...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 18 - Subsection 18(1) - Paragraph 18(1)(e) | 187 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 66.1 - Subsection 66.1(6) - Canadian exploration expense - Paragraph (a) | limited recourse promissory note | 187 |
Canada v. Livingston, 2008 DTC 6233, 2008 FCA 89
In order to help her friend (Davies) defeat efforts of CRA to collect unpaid taxes from Davies, the taxpayer opened up a bank account in the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 160 - Subsection 160(1) | transfer to an accommodation party was caught | 166 |
Petro-Canada v. Canada, 2004 DTC 6329, 2004 FCA 158
Joint exploration corporations (the "JECs") acquired seismic data from one of the two shareholders of each JEC at a purchase price substantially...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 66.1 - Subsection 66.1(6) - Canadian exploration expense - Paragraph (a) | no plan to use purchased seismic data | 144 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 67 | paying more than FMV may not engage s. 67 | 109 |
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Purpose/Intention | purpose test satisfied even if multiple purposes | 77 |
Deptuck v. Canada, 2003 DTC 5273, 2003 FCA 177
S.69(1)(a) applied to reduce the capital cost to a partnership of depreciable property purchased by it to the property's fair market value rather...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 69 - Subsection 69(1) - Paragraph 69(1)(a) | s. 69(1)(a) applies to a purchasing partnership as if it were a person | 156 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 96 - Subsection 96(1) - Paragraph 96(1)(c) | 115 |
Brown v. Canada, 2003 DTC 5298, 2003 FCA 192 (FCA)
At the time a partnership, of which the taxpayer subsequently became a partner, negotiated an agreement for the acquisition of software, the same...
Dixon v. Deputy Attorney General of Canada, 91 DTC 5584 (Ont HCJ.)
An alleged transaction in which a corporation sold land at a substantial undervalue to another corporation in which its president ("Dixon") had a...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Solicitor-Client Privilege | 160 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 56 - Subsection 56(2) | 58 |
Peter Cundill & Associates Ltd. v. The Queen, 91 DTC 5085, [1991] 1 CTC 197 (FCTD), aff'd 91 DTC 5543 (FCA)
The taxpayer, which was the portfolio manager for the Cundill Value Fund and the Cundill Security Fund was dependent upon Mr. F. Peter Cundill,...
Millward v. The Queen, 86 DTC 6538, [1986] 2 CTC 423 (FCTD)
A company owned by the taxpayer mortgaged land in favour of an RRSP of the taxpayer's partner ("Coates") in his law firm and a company owned by...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Regulations - Regulation 4900 - Subsection 4900(4) | 128 |
Beaumont v. The Queen, 86 DTC 6264, [1986] 1 CTC 507 (FCTD), aff'd 88 DTC 6522, [1988] 2 CTC 365 (FCA)
Since the taxpayer was held to be dealing at arm's length with a corporation ("Clarebeau") 1/2 of whose shares were owned by the taxpayer's family...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 7 - Subsection 7(1) - Paragraph 7(1)(b) | 136 |
Special Risks Holdings Inc. v. The Queen, 86 DTC 6035, [1986] 1 CTC 201 (FCA)
Before finding that a corporation in which the taxpayer held 50% of the voting shares was subject to de facto control by the taxpayer in light of...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84 - Subsection 84(9) | 166 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 86 - Subsection 86(1) | 166 |
Windsor Plastic Products Ltd. v. The Queen, 86 DTC 6171, [1986] 1 CTC 331 (FCTD)
The three shareholders of the taxpayer, each of whom was a minority shareholder and one of whom was related to a non-resident corporation...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 212 - Subsection 212(4) - Paragraph 212(4)(a) | shareholders acting in concert | 139 |
Robson Leather Co. Ltd. v. MNR, 74 DTC 6666, [1974] CTC 872 (FCTD), aff'd 77 DTC 5106, [1977] CTC 132 (FCA)
1/2 the shares of a company ("Appel Process") were held by a second company ("Robson Leather") 75% of whose shares were held by a trust whose...
Oryx Realty Corp. v. MNR, 74 DTC 6352, [1974] CTC 430 (FCA), aff'd in another respect in sub nom. MNR v. Shofar Investment Corp., 79 DTC 5347, [1979] CTC 433, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 350
On April 20, 1959, the taxpayer purchased land inventory, from a company ("Lanber") which was owned in the same proportions as itself, on...
Swiss Bank Corp. et al. v. Minister of National Revenue, 72 DTC 6470, [1972] CTC 614, [1974] S.C.R. 1144
The manager ("SIP") of a Swiss fund incorporated an Ontario company ("City Park") to serve as a vehicle for the investment of monies of the Fund...
Pender Enterprises Ltd. v. MNR, 65 DTC 5202, [1965] CTC 343 (Ex Ct)
The sale by an individual of his business to a corporation owned equally by his brother-in-law and cousin (who also were senior employees of his...
Rolka v. MNR, 62 DTC 1394, [1962] CTC 637 (Ex Ct)
The taxpayer was found to indirectly control, and therefore not to be dealing at arm's length with, a corporation ("Nelmar") for purposes of what...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Solicitor-Client Privilege | 26 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(5.1) | 49 |
Golden Arrow Sprayers Ltd. v. MNR, 61 DTC 1185, [1961] CTC 318 (Ex Ct)
The transfer of patent rights by an individual to a newly-incorporated corporation of which he was to be the controlling shareholder and the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Regulations - Schedules - Schedule II - Class 14 | patents were Classs 14 property | 51 |
Ancaster Development Co. Ltd. v. MNR, 61 DTC 1047, [1961] CTC 91 (Ex Ct)
The taxpayer, whose three shareholders were Rolka, Young and Atkinson each holding 45%, 45% and 10% of its shares, respectively, sold land at its...
MNR v. Kirby Maurice Co. Ltd., 58 DTC 1033, [1958] CTC 41 (Ex Ct)
A proprietor of a business who wished to incorporate it, directed his solicitors to incorporate a corporation, and instructed them as to the terms...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Regulations - Schedules - Schedule II - Class 14 | 150 |
MNR v. Granite Bay Timber Co. Ltd., 58 DTC 1066, [1958] CTC 117 (Ex Ct), briefly aff'd 59 DTC 1262 (SCC)
The liquidator of a company, who was one of its three shareholders, distributed all the property of the company to the shareholders subject to the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(1) - Transaction | 112 |
Minister of National Revenue v. Sheldon's Engineering Ltd., 55 DTC 1110, [1955] CTC 174, [1955] S.C.R. 637
When the minority shareholders of a company (the "Old Company") learned that the majority shareholders were going to sell their shares of the Old...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Resolving Ambiguity | 11 |
See Also
Harvard Properties Inc. v. The King, 2024 TCC 139
A Calgary shopping mall was sold by Harvard Properties and the other co-owners to a third party (“Abacus”) in a share sale transaction but at...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 160 - Subsection 160(1) | sale of shares, in a structured transaction, at a price that did not reflect a discount for the underlying accrued taxes, was indicative of non-arm's length dealing | 643 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(4) | avoidance on a non-arm’s length relationship so as to avoid the application of s. 160 would be a GAAR abuse | 434 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(2) | GAAR alternative basis was not statute-barred where the primary assessment (under s. 160(2)) was not subject to statute-barring | 197 |
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Fair Market Value - Shares | shares of company whose only assets were escrowed for an imminently-closing sale transaction did not have any value | 285 |
Godcharles v. Agence du revenu du Québec, 2021 QCCA 1843
A group of unrelated individuals were the co-owners of a seniors’ residence (“SR”), which was leased by them to the corporate operator of...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 68 - Paragraph 68(a) | s. 68 reallocated between a retirement home’s business operations sold by one vendor and the home sold by the other vendors | 424 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 69 - Subsection 69(1) - Paragraph 69(1)(b) - Subparagraph 69(1)(b)(i) | s. 69 cannot reduce inflated proceeds to vendor | 435 |
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Fair Market Value - Land | goodwill portion of retirement residences business determined as the residual from valuing the residence using the cost method | 272 |
Godcharles v. Agence du revenu du Québec, 2020 QCCQ 2219, aff'd 2021 QCCA 1843
The taxpayers were a corporation (“9118”) and its eight individual shareholders who co-owned a fully-occupied retirement residence whose...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Fair Market Value - Land | retirement home valued using cost method with residual to goodwill | 127 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 69 - Subsection 69(1) - Paragraph 69(1)(b) | transaction between parties acting in concert required increased allocation to the real estate sold at shareholder level | 318 |
Keybrand Foods Inc. v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 161, aff'd 2020 FCA 201
The taxpayer (“Keybrand”), its wholly-owning parent (“BWS”), and another Strassburger-family company were guarantors of loans made to a...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 20 - Subsection 20(1) - Paragraph 20(1)(c) - Subparagraph 20(1)(c)(i) | interest was deductible on money borrowed to be lent at interest to company in default cf. money borrowed to acquire its shares when its collapse was imminent | 346 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 39 - Subsection 39(1) - Paragraph 39(1)(c) - Subparagraph 39(1)(c)(ii) | right of parent of taxpayer to elect majority of board of investee of X through chair’s casting vote entailed de facto control by taxpayer of X | 227 |
HLB Smith Holdings Limited v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 83
A company (“PES,” or the “Operating Company”) providing electricians’ services initially was owned on a 50-50 basis by two individuals...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 160 - Subsection 160(1) | s. 160 liability flowed through with dividends paid to 50-50 unrelated shareholders | 154 |
Poulin v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 154, briefly aff’d sub nomine Turgeon v. The Queen, 2017 FCA 103
In the fall of 2007, the two equal individual shareholders (“Poulin” and “Turgeon”) of a Quebec construction corporation (“Amiante”)...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | sale to employee's Holdco with not upside and no risk for employee was non-arm's length | 261 |
Kiperchuk v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1088 [at 486], 2013 TCC 60
The taxpayer was the designated beneficiary of her husband's RRSP, and received the RRSP proceeds upon his death, and was assessed for his unpaid...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 160 - Subsection 160(1) | 260 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(a) | taxpayer was not related to her deceased husband | 110 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(b) | 94 |
Wagner v. The Queen, 2012 DTC 1234 [at 3645], 2012 TCC 8
An agreement between the taxpayers and an unrelated purchaser of their shares to allocate a portion of the amounts paid by the purchaser to the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 68 | 329 |
Alberta Printed Circuits Ltd. v. The Queen, 2011 DTC 1177 [at 967], 2011 TCC 232
The taxpayer was a Canadian-controlled private corporation in the business of printing customized circuits, held 75% by a holding company for Mr....
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 247 - New - Subsection 247(2) | internal CUP applied over TNMM | 197 |
| Tax Topics - Treaties - Income Tax Conventions - Article 26 | 96 | |
| Tax Topics - Treaties - Income Tax Conventions - Article 9 | 96 |
The Queen v. Yelle, 2010 DTC 5128 [at 7083], 2010 ABPC 94
The taxpayer, who was a member of a partnership, was accused of tax evasion under s. 239(1)(a) in connection with capital cost allowance claims...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 13 - Subsection 13(21) - Undepreciated Capital Cost - A | 155 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 69 - Subsection 69(1) - Paragraph 69(1)(a) | 126 |
Brownco Inc. v. The Queen, 2008 DTC 2591, 2008 TCC 58
The taxpayer and its 50% shareholder were found not to be dealing with each other at arm's-length in light of the fact that the taxpayer agreed to...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(5.1) | 50% shareholder was entitled to one of two directors with tie-breaking vote | 196 |
McMullen v. The Queen, 2007 DTC 286, 2007 TCC 16
The taxpayer and an unrelated individual ("DeBruyn") accomplished a split-up of the business of a corporation ("DEL") of which they were equal...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(3) | 270 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(4) | 198 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84 - Subsection 84(2) | 229 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | arm's length: negotiation based on self-interest | 257 |
Baxter v. The Queen, 2006 DTC 2642, 2006 TCC 230
Before going on to find that the taxpayer had purchased a sublicence of software from a person with whom he was dealing at arm's length (and...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Fair Market Value - Other | 124 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 9 - Agency - Agency | 94 |
Brouillette v. The Queen, 2005 DTC 1004, 2005 TCC 203
The taxpayer facilitated a leveraged buy-out of him and his co-shareholder of a company ("Brouillette Automobiles") by incorporating a corporation...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(3) | 173 |
McLarty v. The Queen, 2005 DTC 217, 2005 TCC 55, rev'd 2006 DTC 6340, 2006 FCA 152, aff'd supra.
The purchase by the taxpayer of an undivided interest in seismic data in a transaction whose terms were set by a promoter nonetheless was an...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 66.1 - Subsection 66.1(6) - Canadian exploration expense - Paragraph (a) | 178 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 67 | 105 |
Morley v. The Queen, 2004 DTC 2604, 2004 TCC 280, briefly aff'd 2006 DTC 6351, 2006 FCA 171
An acquisition of software by a tax-shelter partnership was found not be an arm's length transaction in light of the very non-commercial nature of...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Other Legislation/Constitution - Charter (Constitution Act, 1982) - Section 8 | 38 | |
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Evidence | 32 | |
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Fair Market Value - Other | 98 | |
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Onus | 100 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 13 - Subsection 13(21) - Undepreciated Capital Cost - A | 177 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 13 - Subsection 13(27) - Paragraph 13(27)(d) | 88 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 96 | start-up activities sufficient to constitute carrying on business in common | 112 |
Siracusa v. The Queen, 2003 DTC 2106, 2003 TCC 941
The taxpayer, who owned one-third of the shares of a corporation that paid a dividend to its shareholders, and was a director and bookkeeper of...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 160 - Subsection 160(1) | 97 |
Martel v. The Queen, 2003 DTC 1187 (TCC)
The assets of a Canadian-controlled private corporation ("Gestion") consisted of the shares of two companies, the first of which ("2321") was...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Corporate/Separate Personality | 65 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 248 - Subsection 248(1) - Small Business Corporation | 134 |
Lanester Sales Ltd. v. The Queen, 2003 DTC 997 (TCC), aff'd 2004 DTC 6461, 2004 FCA 217
After finding that the taxpayer (a franchisee) and the franchisor were dealing with each other at arm's length, Bowman A.C.J. stated (at p....
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(5.1) | no de facto control by franchisor | 130 |
Petro-Canada v. The Queen, 2003 DTC 94 (TCC), aff'd supra.
In order that Canadian exploration expenses of another oil and gas company ("Phillips" could be transferred to the taxpayer for purposes of the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Evidence | 80 | |
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Fair Market Value - Other | 44 |
Joncas v. The Queen, 2002 DTC 1813 (TCC), aff'd 2002 DTC 7060, 2002 FCA 234 (French)
A sale by the taxpayer of his shares of a company (Trans Côte) to a corporation (LBS) whose voting shares were equally owned by the taxpayer and...
Brown v. The Queen, 2001 DTC 1094 (TCC), aff'd supra 2003 DTC 5298 (FCA)
The purchase by a partnership of software from an American company ("ASC") was found to be a transaction between persons not dealing with each...
Campbell v. The Queen, 99 DTC 1073 (TCC)
A Bahamian company ("Helvetia") distributed all the shares of its Canadian subsidiary ("Quamco") equally to three trusts each of which owned...
MFC Bancorp Ltd. v. R., 99 DTC 905, [1999] 4 CTC 2468 (TCC)
A transfer by the taxpayer of its interest as lessor in mining concessions and railway rights-of-way to a corporation ("CJC") in which a...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 56 - Subsection 56(4) | 99 |
Christensen v. The Queen, 98 DTC 1893, [1998] 4 CTC 2198 (TCC)
The transfer to the taxpayer of a property in which she had been living with a married man who controlled the corporate transferor was found to be...
H.T. Hoy Holdings Ltd. v. R., 97 DTC 1180, [1997] 2 CTC 2874 (TCC)
The taxpayer and an unrelated individual (Cloutier) were found to be dealing at arm's length in transactions through which the taxpayer indirectly...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(5) - Paragraph 251(5)(b) | 65 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 55 - Subsection 55(4) | 50 |
Lixo Investments Ltd. v. R., 97 DTC 1030, [1997] 2 CTC 2772 (TCC)
The corporate taxpayer was found to be dealing in arm's length with a non-resident corporation ("Slupy") which had provided most of the taxpayer's...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 212 - Subsection 212(1) - Subparagraph 212(1)(b)(vii) | 140 |
Robertson v. The Queen, 97 DTC 449, [1996] 2 CTC 2269 (TCC)
The taxpayer, who was the deputy chairman and a director of a public corporation ("Central Capital"), was found to be dealing at arm's length with...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 18 - Subsection 18(1) - Paragraph 18(1)(b) - Capital Loss v. Loss | 36 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 39 - Subsection 39(4) | 36 | |
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Interpretation Act - Section 32 | s. 32 deals with departures from form rather than content | 43 |
RMM Canadian Enterprises Inc. v. R., 97 DTC 302, [1998] 1 C.T.C. 2300 (TCC)
A non-resident corporation ("EC") approached a business associate who, along with two other individuals, formed a Canadian corporation ("RMM") to...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 159 - Subsection 159(3) | 167 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(3) | 188 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(4) | 235 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84 - Subsection 84(2) | application of s. 84(2) to sale of cash-rich company to accommodation party who quickly paid cash proceeds therefor | 222 |
| Tax Topics - Treaties - Income Tax Conventions | 96 | |
| Tax Topics - Treaties - Income Tax Conventions - Article 10 | 116 |
McNichol v. R., 97 DTC 111, [1997] 2 CTC 2088 (TCC)
In order to effectively receive the cash held by a corporation ("Bec") owned by them, the taxpayers found a corporate purchaser to purchase their...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(4) | 234 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84 - Subsection 84(2) | 191 |
Davidson Estate v. The Queen, 96 DTC 1652, [1996] 3 CTC 2900 (TCC)
The estate of a deceased taxpayer (which was deemed by s.248 to be a person) was found to be dealing at arm's length with the taxpayer's surviving...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Application Rules - Subsection 26(5) | 98 |
Wright Estate v. The Queen, 96 DTC 1509 (TCC)
A testamentary trust was found to be dealing at arm's length with the three shareholders of a family corporation (the son and daughter of the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(a) | a trust is a person which is related to no one | 327 |
Freedman Holdings Inc. v. The Queen, 96 DTC 1447 (TCC)
Pursuant to a separation agreement between Mr. and Mrs. Freedman, Mr. Freedman agreed to pay Mrs. Freedman the sum of $950,000 in full...
Whitehouse v. Ellam, [1995] BTC 284 (Ch. D.)
The written assignment by the Netherlands judgment creditor of an insolvent company of debt for a nominal amount to the taxpayer and the other...
Husky Oil Ltd. v. The Queen, 95 DTC 316, [1995] 1 CTC 2184 (TCC), aff'd 95 DTC 5244 (FCA)
The taxpayer purchased the shares of a holding company whose assets consisted of shares of operating companies whose adjusted cost base...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Fair Market Value - Shares | 82 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 246 - Subsection 246(1) | 128 |
Bowens v. The Queen, 94 DTC 1863 (TCC), aff'd 96 DTC 6128 (FCA)
When a corporation ("Trilogy") made an offer to acquire all the shares of a corporation ("DEB"), including any outstanding stock options, the...
Del Grande v. The Queen, 93 DTC 133 (TCC)
The taxpayer, who was a 25% shareholder in a private company, was found to be dealing at arm's length with the company given that the other...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 15 - Subsection 15(1) | not a shareholder benefit if option exercisable only while officer; obligation v. conferral | 197 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 7 - Subsection 7(5) | 114 | |
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Specific v. General Provisions | 81 |
Martin Feed Mills Ltd. v. MNR, 91 DTC 1069, [1991] 2 CTC 2052 (TCC)
A third party ("Grundy") purchased shares of a corporation indirectly controlled by an individual ("Martin") only to accommodate Martin as his...
Francois Fournier v. Minister of National Revenue, 91 DTC 746, [1991] 1 CTC 2699 (TCC)
The taxpayer, who had a 45% shareholding in a private company, agreed with the other principal shareholder and director and on the advice of the...
International Aviation Terminals (Calgary) Ltd. v. MNR, 89 DTC 671, [1990] 1 CTC 2017 (TCC)
A transaction whereby the three indirect individual shareholders of the Appellant "acted in concert to cause the Appellant to distribute $715,000...
Grant v. MNR, 89 DTC 16 (TCC)
Two couples each owned 50% of the voting shares of a private corporation, either directly or through holding companies. A declaration of a...
Roxon Property Management Ltd. v. MNR, 88 DTC 1306, [1988] 1 CTC 2512 (TCC)
In order for the taxpayer to realize an allowable business investment loss with respect to a debt owing to it by its subsidiary (MIL) the two...
May Estate v. MNR, 88 DTC 1189, [1988] 1 CTC 2303 (TCC)
The acquisition of shares by an estate by virtue of the death of the deceased was not an arm's length transaction because "the trust created by...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(2) - Paragraph 251(2)(a) | 14 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(6) - Paragraph 251(6)(b) | 11 |
Noranda Mines Ltd. v. MNR, 87 DTC 379, [1987] 2 CTC 2089 (TCC)
45.3% of the common shares of Orchan Mines Limited ("Orchan") were owned by Noranda Mines Limited ("Noranda"), and 5.53% of the common shares of...
Re Tremblay (1980), 36 C.B.R. (N.S.) 111 (Q.S.C.)
It was stated, in the context of the Bankruptcy Act, that a transaction is not at arm's length "where one of the co-contracting parties is, by...
MNR v. Merritt Estate, 69 DTC 5159, [1969] CTC 207 (Ex Ct)
The deceased, in one of his sober moments, agreed with his son's professional adviser that in order to protect his investments from further...
Gatineau Westgate Inc. v. MNR, 66 DTC 560 (TCC)
The two principal shareholders and directors of the taxpayer, who also carried on a real estate business in partnership, sold real estate to the...
Sheldons Engineering Ltd. v. MNR, 53 DTC 11 (TAB), aff'd 54 DTC 1106 (Ex Ct) and at 55 DTC 1110, [1955] S.C.R. 637 (supra).
Before going on to find that a transaction was an arm's length one, Mr. Fisher noted (at p. 22) that "the expression 'to deal at arm's length' is...
Administrative Policy
13 April 2023 External T.I. 2017-0684341E5 F - Perte au titre d’un placement d’entreprise
An individual owned an interest-bearing debt of a wholly-owned corporation operating a restaurant which in 20X1 sued the franchisor at the same...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 39 - Subsection 39(1) - Paragraph 39(1)(c) | active business for SBC purposes can continue after regular business operations have ceased/ sale of debt for $1 to unrelated purchasers might be a non-arm’s length transaction | 318 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 248 - Subsection 248(1) - Small Business Corporation | a corporation may continue to qualify as an SBC well after it has in fact ceased to transact its business | 209 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 18 - Subsection 18(1) - Paragraph 18(1)(a) - Income-Producing Purpose | business does not cease until the prior commitments incurred in the course of the business are fulfilled | 136 |
7 October 2021 APFF Roundtable Q. 7, 2021-0900971C6 F - Economic dependence
Is financial dependence of one party on another sufficient in itself to create a non-arm’s length relationship?
CRA stated:
1 June 2021 External T.I. 2020-0865201E5 F - Sale of property for POD less than FMV
Messrs. X and Y (unrelated individuals), who each wholly-owned operating corporations ("ACo" and "BCo"), also equally owned XYZCo, which built 12...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 56 - Subsection 56(2) | sale of 2 properties by 50-50 corp at a knowing undervalue to the respective shareholders’ own corporations could engage s. 56(2) | 163 |
23 February 2021 External T.I. 2018-0769891E5 F - 125(7) "revenu de société déterminé"
Opco A (wholly-owned by Mr. A) and Opco B (wholly-owned by Mr. B, who deals at arm’s length with Mr. A) each hold 50% of the shares in Opco D. ...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 125 - Subsection 125(7) - Specified Corporate Income - Paragraph (a) - Subparagraph (a)(i) - Clause (a)(i)(B) - Subclause (a)(i)(B)(I) | services income from multiple private corporations referenced in s. (a)(i)(A) can be bad income for purposes of the substantially all test | 477 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 125 - Subsection 125(1) - Paragraph 125(1)(a) - Subparagraph 125(1)(a)(i) - Clause 125(1)(a)(i)(B) | services income from multiple investee private corporations can be bad income for purposes of the specified corporate income - s. (a)(i)(B) safe harbour | 385 |
2021 Ruling 2020-0868661R3 F - Section 84.1 – Leveraged Buyout
The shares of Holdco - which holds real estate that it leases to Opco (carrying on a Canadian active business) – are held by three unrelated...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | s. 84.1 did not apply to a leveraged buyout financed by the target | 203 |
11 October 2019 APFF Roundtable Q. 12, 2019-0812711C6 - Part IV
The common shares of X Corp. and Y Corp are held equally by two unrelated corporations. Whether Y Corp. was connected to X Corp. - so that a...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 186 - Subsection 186(2) | two 50% shareholders of two corporations likely acting in concert to produce connectedness | 246 |
7 September 2016 External T.I. 2014-0563781E5 - Articles 10 and 11 of Canada-UK Treaty
An issue arising under the Canada-UK Treaty was whether the 99% share of the limited partners of a UK LP in interest paid by a Canadian subsidiary...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Treaties - Income Tax Conventions - Article 11 | limited partners of an LP can deal at arm’s length with a Canadian subsidiary of the LP | 452 |
| Tax Topics - Treaties - Income Tax Conventions - Article 10 | limited partners generally do not have control over a company’s voting power/an over-10% limited partner is considered to “indirectly” own over 10% of an LP subsidiary | 471 |
19 January 2017 External T.I. 2015-0576751E5 F - Trust, Disposition of depreciable property, Assumption
CRA agreed that the ½ step-up rule in s. 13(7)(e) does not apply to a deemed disposition under s. 104(5) given that the trust is not related to...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 13 - Subsection 13(7) - Paragraph 13(7)(e) | s. 13(7)(e) applicable to s. 107(2.1) distribution but not s. 104(5) deemed disposition | 300 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - 101-110 - Section 107 - Subsection 107(2) | s. 107(2) generally available where beneficiary assumes trust debt | 168 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 248 - Subsection 248(1) - Personal Trust | non-commital as to whether assumption of debt could constitute tainting consideration | 183 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - 101-110 - Section 107 - Subsection 107(2.1) | s. 13(7)(e) applicable to depreciable property distribution | 123 |
29 November 2016 CTF Roundtable Q. 6, 2016-0669661C6 - 84.1 and the Poulin/Turgeon Case
Does the Poulin decision affect CRA’s view of employee buyco arrangements? CRA responded that it could be established that the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 118.1 - Subsection 118.1(1) - Total Charitable Gifts - Paragraph (c) - Subparagraph (c)(ii) | right of GREs to carry forward donations for five years | 109 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | Poulin is consistent with CRA's previous statements on employee buycos | 148 |
7 October 2016 APFF Roundtable Q. 20, 2016-0655831C6 F - Employee Buycos and the Poulin Case
Following the Poulin decision, does CRA intend to modify its position respecting the potential application of s. 84.1 where a departing employee...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | Poulin accepted | 134 |
2014 Ruling 2014-0539791R3 - Paragraph 212(1)(b)
CDS trust entered into credit default swaps with a counterparty (a non-resident Bank) desiring credit protection for its bond portfolios and...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 212 - Subsection 212(1) - Paragraph 212(1)(b) | creditors' approval of CCAA plan of compromise for the debtor trust did not cause them to not deal at arm's length with trust | 386 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 212 - Subsection 212(3) - Participating debt interest | interest paid on limited recourse debt to the extent of available debtor assets was not participating debt interest | 248 |
S1-F5-C1 - Related Persons and Dealing at Arm's Length
In response to the release in draft form of Folio S1-F5-C1 entitled "Related persons and dealing at arm's length," the Joint Committee made...
S1-F5-C1 - Related Persons and Dealing at Arm's Length
General critiera for non-arm's length
1.38 The following criteria have generally been used by the courts in determining whether parties to a...
25 November 2012 Roundtable, 2013-0479401C6 F - Employés et Achat Ltée commentaires panel ARC
In order to facilitate the disposition of shares of departing employees who had purchased their shares under an employee share ownership plan...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) - Paragraph 84.1(1)(b) | generally a deemed dividend on repurchase of departing employees’ shares by employer-funded Buyco | 141 |
25 November 2012 CTF Roundtable, 2013-0479402C6 - Employee Buycos - comments from CRA Panel
Employees of Opco received Opco shares as incentives under an Opco employee share ownership plan ("ESOP"). Under the terms of the ESOP, on...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | stock option Buyco not at arm's length | 194 |
19 April 2012 External T.I. 2012-0439781E5 - Specified employee for SRED credits
Corporation A and Corporation B have 60% and 40% interests in a partnership which employs Corporation A's sole shareholder (Mr A) to perform...
10 April 2012 External T.I. 2011-0428701E5 F - Lien de dépendance - commanditaire et SEC
Two corporations (X and Y) each wholly own the two general partners (each with a 1% GP interest) of a limited partnership and also own (on a 50-50...
8 October 2010 APFF Roundtable, 2010-0373181C6 F - Non-arm's length relationship
Respecting a transaction between a non-profit organization and a registered charity where both entities share certain board members, CRA stated...
15 September 2010 Internal T.I. 2010-0371521I7 F - French Version of paragraph 23 in IT-419R
The French version of IT-419R2, para. 23, which rendered "not dealing at arm's length" as "sans lien de dépendance" will be promptly corrected.
22 May 2009 Internal T.I. 2009-0312791I7 F - Transfert de biens entre un rentier et son REÉR
Before finding that the purchase of RRRSP property (the “Co-op” shares) by the RRSP’s annuitant at cost was to be treated as the payment of...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 146 - Subsection 146(1) - Premium | purchase of RRSP property at cost is viewed as premium to the extent of excess over FMV | 166 |
5 October 2007 APFF Roundtable Q. 10, 2007-0243171C6 F - Surplus Stripping
CRA considered that where an individual (Mr. X) holding all the common shares of Opco exchanged all his common shares for retractable preferred...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | treatment of Employeeco purchase depends on whether it has a separate economic interest | 360 |
IT-419R2
"Meaning of Arm's Length." At para. 29:
The following criteria have generally been used by the courts in determining whether parties to a...
12 September 2005 External T.I. 2005-0134631E5 F - Superficial Loss - Realization of Latent Loss
Four unrelated individuals each holding 25% of the common shares of a small business corporation, transfer their shares to a corporation...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 54 - Superficial Loss | loss could be realized by 4 unrelated individuals transferring their equal shareholdings of Opco to Newco | 139 |
2005 Ruling 2005-0133041R3 - Investors not dealing non-arm's length
In the context of an issue as to whether shares of a non-resident corporation were taxable Canadian property, CRA ruled that the winding-up of the...
2 July 2003 External T.I. 2002-0180015 F - Usufruit d'un immeuble
Mr. X disposes of his principal residence and the underlying land to a corporation (whose shareholders are his son and an arm’s length person)...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 69 - Subsection 69(1) - Paragraph 69(1)(b) - Subparagraph 69(1)(b)(i) | application of s. 69(1)(b)(i) on transfer of individual’s property to a corporation with him having the usufruct | 126 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - 101-110 - Section 105 - Subsection 105(1) | no benefit re use of personal-use property | 180 |
12 June 2003 External T.I. 2003-0019725 F - Sale of Holding' Shares to OPCO
Three unrelated individuals (X, Y and Z), in addition to holding some of the shares of Opco directly, also held Opco shares through their...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | s. 84.1 likely applicable re transaction in which 3 unrelated individuals act in concert to step up shares in Opco | 203 |
26 March 2003 External T.I. 2003-0008645 F - Non-Arm's Length Sale of Shares
Regarding whether a transaction between a holding company owned equally by a married couple and a corporation wholly-owned by the nephew of one of...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | no presumption that a transaction between companies owned by couple and nephew, respectively, is not arm’s length | 113 |
28 March 2003 External T.I. 2002-016665
Two shareholders collectively holding 24% of the shares of Opco transfer their shares of Opco to a newly-incorporated holding company ("Xyco") and...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | 84.1 may apply to partial buyout by Holdco for independent employees | 170 |
13 September 2002 External T.I. 2002-0159525 F - Non-Arm's Length Sale of Shares
Regarding whether a sale of shares of a farming corporation by a resident individual to a Canadian purchaser owned by his nephew would be a...
25 February 2002 External T.I. 2000-0046485 F - Majoration et Immobilisation
Planning to equalize assets of two target corporations (Aco and Bco) in connection with their sale to two purchasers (HoldcoA and HoldcoB) - which...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 88 - Subsection 88(1) - Paragraph 88(1)(c) - Subparagraph 88(1)(c)(v) | reciprocal transactions entailed acting in concert, so that the bump was denied under s. 88(1)(c)(v) | 296 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 88 - Subsection 88(1) - Paragraph 88(1)(c) - Subparagraph 88(1)(c)(vi) - Clause 88(1)(c)(vi)(B) - Subclause 88(1)(c)(vi)(B)(I) | reciprocal transactions entailed acting in concert, so that the bump was denied under s. 88(1)(c)(vi)(B)(I) given resulting specified shareholder status | 323 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 88 - Subsection 88(1) - Paragraph 88(1)(d.2) | reciprocal transactions entailed acting in concert, so that the bump was denied under s. 88(1)(c) and (d.2) by virtue of backdating acquisition of acquisition of control by parent | 321 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 9 - Capital Gain vs. Profit - Shares | arguable that preferred shares received on s. 85(1) rollover basis for eligible capital property transfer, and immediately sold, were not capital property | 62 |
10 May 2001 External T.I. 2001-0075685 - EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION IN A RRSP
An employee implicitly was treated as not dealing at arm's length with his RRSP.
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 7 - Subsection 7(3) - Paragraph 7(3)(a) | 81 |
22 May 2001 External T.I. 2000-0047245 F - Divorce
Prior to their divorce, Mr. A transferred to Ms. A a portion of his shares of Opco and Ms. A exchanged her shares of Opco for freeze preferred...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | sale of ex-wife’s shares of Opco (acquired in marriage settlement) to new Holdco of her ex-husband for Holdco note would engage s. 84.1 if these were “reciprocal transactions” | 162 |
29 March 2001 External T.I. 2001-0074145 - Affiliated persons & stop loss rules
Where the shares of a corporation are owned equally by four trusts having the same corporate trustee, s. 40(3.6) will apply to deny a capital loss...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 40 - Subsection 40(3.6) | 70 |
15 February 2001 External T.I. 1999-0008405 F - Lien de dépendance
Y sold his wholly-owned corporation (Yco) to a corporation (Xco) owned by an unrelated individual (X), in consideration for $100,000 in cash ...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | secured promissory note potentially could give rise to de facto control | 107 |
May 1998 Conference for Advanced Life Underwriting Round Table, Q. 1, No. 9807000
A donor and donee may be considered to have different interests and, therefore, to deal at arm's length notwithstanding that each party may have...
Income Tax Technical News, No. 9, 10 February 1997
Where two unrelated shareholders each own 50% of the shares of a corporation, the fact that they used their own RRSPs to acquire shares of the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Other Legislation/Constitution - Federal - Indian Act - Section 87 | 26 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 212 - Subsection 212(1) - Subparagraph 212(1)(b)(vii) | events must be beyond borrower's control | 77 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(4) | loss transfer must be to affiliated person - related not enough | 48 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 88 - Subsection 88(1) - Paragraph 88(1)(c.3) - Subparagraph 88(1)(c.3)(ii) | 151 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Regulations - Regulation 4900 - Subsection 4900(12) | 69 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 53 - Subsection 53(1) - Paragraph 53(1)(e) - Subparagraph 53(1)(e)(i) | avoidance of double taxation through absence of ACB adjustment | 129 |
6 January 1997 External T.I. 9640845 - TRUST AND ARM'S LENGTH DEALINGS
In response to a query as to whether two trusts are considered to
be dealing at arm's length notwithstanding that they have the same public...
23 May 1996 External T.I. 9604655 - DEEMED REACQUISITION - WHETHER NON-ARM'S LENGTH
Where there is a deemed dispostion and reacquisition of property under s. 149(10), the corporation in question will not be considered to be...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 13 - Subsection 13(7) - Paragraph 13(7)(e) | person potentially may not deal at arm's length with itself | 74 |
11 October 1996 APFF Roundtable, 7M12910 - APFF ROUND TABLE
Because two shareholders who together owned all the shares of a corporation (50% each) used their respective RRSPs to acquire shares in the...
11 October 1996 APFF Roundtable, 7M12910 - APFF ROUND TABLE
Where $500,000 of shares of Opco are sold by its individual shareholder to a corporate purchaser, following which the purchased shares are...
1995 Ontario Tax Conference Round Table, Q. 5 (No. 952503)
Where $500,000 of shares of Opco are sold by its individual shareholder to a corporate purchaser, following which the purchased shares are...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(4) | 124 |
27 October 1994 External T.I. 9424545 - PROFIT SHARING PLAN FOR CORPORATE PARTNER
"Where a partnership owns more than 50% of the issued voting shares of a corporation and where a particular partner is entitled without...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(2) - Paragraph 251(2)(c) - Subparagraph 251(2)(c)(i) | 75 |
12 January 1993 T.I. (Tax Window, No. 28, p. 21, ¶2388)
Where a widow is the sole beneficiary of her husband's estate and all the shares of a corporation previously owned by her husband are held by an...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(5) - Paragraph 251(5)(b) | 67 |
21 August 1992 T.I. (Tax Window, No. 23, p. 1, ¶2141)
Discussion whether a transaction occurring pursuant to a buy-sell agreement entered into between a taxpayer and a company owned by her husband as...
92 C.R. - Q.33
The acquisition of shares of a deceased by his estate is a transaction between persons not dealing at arm's length.
92 CPTJ - Q.14
Under normal circumstances, the general partner in a limited partnership will be considered to control the partnership and, therefore, will not be...
18 December 1991 T.I. (Tax Window, No. 12, p. 23, ¶1572)
The Bank of Canada does not deal at arm's length with any federal department, agency or Crown corporation.
10 July 1991 T.I. 1991-111
Where two limited partnerships have the same general partner and none of the limited partners in either partnership are related to each other, the...
9 May 1991 T.I. 5-7883 [GP control's LP's business]
CRA stated:
[I]n a limited partnership with only one general partner, that general partner will generally have control of the partnership's...
8 March 1991 T.I. (Tax Window, No. 2, p. 23, ¶1190)
Even if the beneficiary of a trust is found not to deal at arm's length with the trust, he will not necessarily be considered not to deal at arm's...
29 December 1989 T.I. (May 1990 Access Letter, ¶1223)
Whether a partnership and a corporation are dealing at arm's length with each other is a question of fact. A series of examples were given. For...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 13 - Subsection 13(7) - Paragraph 13(7)(e) | 62 |
September 1989 Revenue Canada Round Table (December 89 Access Letter, ¶1040.11)
If a person acquires a minority interest in a small private corporation, operating with a deficit, it is likely that this person has expressed...
IT-140R3 "Buy-Sell Agreements"
Where the deceased and the survivor did not deal at arm's length at the time a buy-sell agreement was made, s. 69(1)(b) applies when the estate...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Fair Market Value - Shares | 0 |
Articles
Matias Milet, Emily Gilmour, "A Discordant Jurisprudence: What does it Mean to be ‘Acting In Concert’?", International Tax (Wolters Kluwer CCH), No. 118, June 2021, pp. 1-7
Swiss Bank (p. 4)
[A]lthough it did not expressly reject the Exchequer Court decision, the SCC [in Swiss Bank] did not refer to the "acting in...
Sandra Mah, Mark Meredith, "Factual Non-Arm's Length Relationships", 2014 Conference Report, (Canadian Tax Foundation), 16:1-24
Kirby-Maurice (16.3)
Kirby-Maurice…formulates in different terms the concept that was expressed by the Supreme Court in Sheldon's Engineering as...
Flannigan, "The Legal Construction of Rights of First Refusal", The Canadian Bar Review, Vol. 76, Nos. 1 & 2, March - June 1997, p. 1.
Owen, "Acting in Concert: Fact or Fiction?", 1992 Canadian Tax Journal, No. 4, p. 829.
Subsection 251(2)
Paragraph 251(2)(a)
See Also
Mathieu v. The Queen, 2014 TCC 207
Through a holding company, the taxpayer held 37.5% of the shares of a corporation which granted him employee stock options ("Forages Garant"). A...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 7 - Subsection 7(3) - Paragraph 7(3)(a) | non-arm's length option surrender proceeds were exempted by s. 7(3)(a) | 150 |
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Interpretation Act - Subsection 45(2) | may look at subsequent amendment to determine whether it changed the law | 132 |
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Specific v. General Provisions | stock option rules more specific than employee benefits | 55 |
May Estate v. MNR, 88 DTC 1189, [1988] 1 CTC 2303 (TCC)
An individual is not related to the relatives of his deceased wife.
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(c) | estate did not deal at arm's length with testotor re bequest | 142 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(6) - Paragraph 251(6)(b) | 11 |
Administrative Policy
25 July 2022 External T.I. 2021-0905871E5 - Section 116 Certificate
A non-resident estate holding the Canadian condo of the Canadian deceased and cash, sells the condo for cash and utilizes the principal residence...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 150 - Subsection 150(1.1) - Paragraph 150(1.1)(b) - Subparagraph 150(1.1)(b)(iii) | no obligation of non-resident estate to file a return where its gain on the sale of a condo was exempted under the principal residence exemption and it had no other income | 237 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 116 - Subsection 116(6.1) | disposition of capital interest arising from estate’s distribution to US beneficiary of cash derived from sale of Canadian real estate was disposition of treaty-protected property | 316 |
12 July 2018 External T.I. 2018-0755471E5 - Half-brothers and related persons
The definition of blood relationship in s. 251(6)(a) includes two persons who are the “brother or sister of the other.” Following inter alia
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(6) - Paragraph 251(6)(a) | half-brothers were connected by blood relationship | 111 |
20 May 2002 External T.I. 2002-0117885 F - Lien de dépendance et application de 120.4
In finding that a trust is related to an individual if its trustee is so related, CCRA stated:
Subsection 104(1) provides in part that, for the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 120.4 - Subsection 120.4(1) - Split Income - Paragraph (c) | split income definition applied on the basis that the business of a partnership is carried on by its partners and that a trust if related based on the relatedness of its trustee | 311 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - 101-110 - Section 104 - Subsection 104(1) | s. 104(1) indicates that related party status of trust is tested through its trustee | 97 |
Paragraph 251(2)(b)
Subparagraph 251(2)(b)(i)
See Also
Kruger Wayagamack Inc. v. The Queen, 2015 DTC 1112 [at 667], 2015 TCC 90, aff'd 2016 FCA 192
Kruger Inc. was the 51% shareholder of the taxpayer and was entitled under the unanimous shareholders agreement between it and the other...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Fair Market Value - Shares | non-assignable put right ignored | 98 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(1) - Paragraph 256(1)(a) | de jure or de facto control requires strategic control, not merely operational control | 340 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(1.2) - Paragraph 256(1.2)(c) | effect of s. 256(1.2)(g) is as if company were run by 3rd party | 254 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(5.1) | de facto control requires strategic control, not merely operational control | 216 |
Ministic Air Ltd. v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 296
The appellant was denied a credit under ETA s. 231(1) in respect of an alleged bad debt, in part, on the basis that 1/3 of the appellant's...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 231 - Subsection 231(1) | debt not written off a recipient not at arm's length | 202 |
Administrative Policy
21 November 2001 Internal T.I. 2001-0094527 F - PERTE REPUTEE NULLE-BRYAN
The discharge pursuant to a bankruptcy proposal of unsecured debt owing by a small business corporation o its shareholder for cents on the dollar...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 40 - Subsection 40(2) - Paragraph 40(2)(g) - Subparagraph 40(2)(g)(ii) | Byram now followed re loss on non-interest-bearing shareholder loan to corporation | 57 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 50 - Subsection 50(1) - Paragraph 50(1)(a) | no partial bad debt recognition under s. 50(1)(a) | 64 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 248 - Subsection 248(27) | s. 248(27) does not permit partial debt write-off under s. 50(1)(a) | 75 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 39 - Subsection 39(1) - Paragraph 39(1)(c) - Subparagraph 39(1)(c)(ii) | settlement of corporate debt under a bankruptcy proposal did not entail disposition of the debt to the corporation | 89 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 116 - Subsection 116(5) | settlement under bankruptcy proposal of debt did not entail a disposition of that debt to the corporation | 50 |
11 May 2017 Internal T.I. 2016-0665931I7 - Related to participating employer
Respecting where two unrelated individuals each held exactly 50% of the (voting common) shares of their employer corporation, the Directorate...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Regulations - Regulation 8000 - Subsection 8300(1) - Individual Pension PLan | two unrelated 50% shareholders potentially could both be related to the corporation based on Duha USA rights and s. 251(5)(b) rights | 295 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(5) - Paragraph 251(5)(b) | s. 251(5)(b) deemed control does not undercut actual de jure control | 161 |
8 September 2017 External T.I. 2014-0549771E5 - Article XXIX-A:3
CRA found that in the situation where a U.S. parent was the trustee of a U.S. trust whose beneficiary was a U.S. Opco, that U.S. Opco qualified as...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Treaties - Income Tax Conventions - Article 29A | a trust is related for purposes of Art. XXIX-A (3) of the Canada-U.S. Treaty to a corporation that is controlled by its corporate trustee | 338 |
| Tax Topics - Treaties - Income Tax Conventions - Article 3 | "person related thereto" defined by ITA meaning of "related person" | 39 |
5 November 2014 External T.I. 2014-0529991E5 F - Avantage pour automobile-personne liée
The board members of a Quebec non-share corporation that is exempt under s. 149(1) ("Entity") are appointed by "Municipality." During a...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 6 - Subsection 6(2) | standby charge computed based on cost to auto owner which is related to employer | 187 |
10 October 2014 APFF Roundtable Q. 16, 2014-0538031C6 - APFF 2014 Q. 16 - Capital gain
In the course of considering the availability of the exception in s. 55(3)(a) for a spin-off, CRA stated (TaxInterpretations translation):...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 55 - Subsection 55(3) - Paragraph 55(3)(a) | interposition of holdco to permit related-person spin-off compliant with s. 55(3)(a)(ii) and (v) | 933 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 55 - Subsection 55(3.01) - Paragraph 55(3.01)(g) | interposition of holdco to permit related-person spin-off compliant with s. 55(3)(a)(ii) and (v) | 925 |
S1-F5-C1 - Related Persons and Dealing at Arm's Length
1.46 Where a trust owns a majority of the voting shares of a corporation…the trust and the corporation will be related persons by virtue of...
Example 7
Mr. A is the sole trustee of a particular trust that owns all of the issued shares in the capital of a corporation.
Both the particular trust and...
1 May 2014 External T.I. 2013-0494981E5 F - De Jure Control
The sole beneficiary of a Quebec trust with two trustees who are unrelated to him has the power to dismiss them (Scenario 1), to dismiss and...
2012 Ruling 2011-0402571R3 - De Jure Control - Debt Settlement
Parent owns the Class B common shares of Lossco and Mr. A, who deals at arm's length with Parent (and with Profitco, a subsidiary of Parent) holds...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(7) - Paragraph 256(7)(b) | 259 |
6 October 2000 External T.I. 2000-0038055 F - Contrôle par une société de personnes
Respecting the question whether two corporations are related persons if they are controlled by a limited partnership or a general partnership, the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(2) - Paragraph 251(2)(c) - Subparagraph 251(2)(c)(i) | general partner usually controls | 217 |
9 August 1994 T.I. 933312 [control by partner with voting rights]
In a situation where a husband and wife each own a holding company (H Holdco and W Holdco), H Holdco has a controlling interest in a partnership...
23 March 1992 T.I. (Tax Window, No. 18, p. 20, ¶1825) [control by trustee]
The sole individual trustee of the family trust controls the corporation whose shares are held by the trust, with the result that that corporation...
90 C.R. - Q28
A partnership is considered to be a person when the computation of income at the partnership level is involved. For example, a partnership that...
87 C.R. - Q.18
Where a subsequent employer purchases all the assets or shares of the former employer, the former employer will qualify as a "person related to...
Subparagraph 251(2)(b)(ii)
Cases
Miron and Frères Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, 55 DTC 1109, [1955] CTC 182, [1955] S.C.R. 679
997 out of the outstanding common shares of a corporation were owned as to 400 shares by an individual and his brother (200 shares each) and, as...
See Also
Castro v. The King, 2024 TCC 3
As a condition to receiving a loan to fund the renovation of a property of the Castros, they were required to transfer the property to a...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 231 - Subsection 231(1) | [unreported GST on sale to corporation controlled de jure by vendors (but with pledge) could not be claimed as credit when unrecoverable from corporation | 330 |
Côté-Létourneau v. The Queen, 2010 DTC 1116 [at 3092], 2007 TCC 91
A sale by the taxpayers (a husband and wife) of their shares of a controlled corporation to another corporation ("9061") all of whose shares were...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(5) - Paragraph 251(5)(c) | 86 | |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(2) - Paragraph 84.1(2)(a.1) | 44 |
Subparagraph 251(2)(b)(iii)
Administrative Policy
22 August 2014 External T.I. 2014-0540751E5 F - Acquisition of control
Two brothers (A and B) own 100% of the shares of Holdco A and Holdco B, respectively, which, each in turn, owns 50% of the shares of Opco. A sells...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(7) - Paragraph 256(7)(a) | addition of cousin to control group would taint it/cousins part of related control group while fathers alive | 529 |
30 January 2013 External T.I. 2012-0470931E5 - Related corporations
Suppose parents Mr. and Mrs. X hold ParentCo, and their children ("Son and Daughter") hold KidsCo. Then:
Mr. X and Mrs. X are related to...
Paragraph 251(2)(c)
Subparagraph 251(2)(c)(i)
Cases
Colmvest Holdings Corporation v. The Queen, 2022 TCC 70
Colmvest, which was the 25% shareholder of a corporation (“443307”), incurred legal fees in an arbitration between it and the 75% shareholder...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 186 - Subsection 186(1) | a minority shareholder could not use the ETA s. 186(1) rule to access ITCs | 234 |
Chutka v. Canada, 2001 DTC 5093 (FCA)
A sale of equipment by a corporation to a partnership whose general partner was wholly-owned by the same individual who owned the vendor...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 69 - Subsection 69(1) - Paragraph 69(1)(a) | partnership looked through in applying s. 69(1)(a) to equipment purchase | 148 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 96 - Subsection 96(1) - Paragraph 96(1)(g) | sale to partnership with non-arm's length general partner was non-arm's length transaction | 138 |
Duha Printers (Western) Ltd. v. Canada, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 795, 98 DTC 6334, [1998] 3 CTC 303
A corporation ("Marr's") controlled by Mr. Marr paid $2,000 to subscribe for redeemable preferred shares representing a majority of the voting...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Tax Avoidance | no business purpose test | 79 |
Zeal and Gold Ltd. v. MNR, 73 DTC 5116, [1973] CTC 129 (FCTD)
As part of a series of transactions wherein one company ("Mercantile") would become owned solely by two of its three shareholders ("Zeal" and...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 13 - Subsection 13(21) - Proceeds of Disposition - Paragraph (c) | 59 |
International Fruit Distributors Ltd. v. MNR, 53 DTC 1222, [1953] CTC 342 (Ex Ct), aff'd without reasons 55 DTC 1186 (SCC)
The taxpayer, which along with another Canadian corporation was controlled by a U.S. parent, was unsuccessful in a submission that it was related...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 248 - Subsection 248(1) - Person | 94 |
Army & Navy Department Stores Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, 53 DTC 1185, [1953] CTC 293, [1953] 2 S.C.R. 496
One-half of the shares of the 5,000 shares of the “Western Company” were owned by the “Alberta company,” and the other half were owned by...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Expressio Unius est Exclusio Alterius | reference to person implied exclusion of persons | 129 |
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Interpretation Act - Subsection 33(2) | 129 | |
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Ownership | the shares of a subsidiary of a corporation are not owned “indirectly” by the shareholders of that corporation | 134 |
Administrative Policy
20 June 2023 STEP Roundtable Q. 8, 2023-0961291C6 - Trust and Related
The questioner provided a simplification of the facts in Consolidated Holding, namely, one corporation is controlled by A and B, as trustees of a...
3 April 2019 Internal T.I. 2018-0787561I7 - Partnership and the Meaning of "Related"
After indicating that a corporation that was wholly-owned by a partnership was related to the corporation which, along with its wholly-owned...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251.2 - Subsection 251.2(2) - Paragraph 251.2(2)(a) | partnership agreement illuminates which partners control a corporation held by the partnership | 89 |
6 October 2000 External T.I. 2000-0038055 F - Contrôle par une société de personnes
Respecting the question whether two corporations are related persons if they are contolled by a limited partnership or a general partnership, the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(2) - Paragraph 251(2)(b) - Subparagraph 251(2)(b)(i) | GP usually controls | 217 |
8 October 2010 Roundtable, 2010-0373141C6 F - Related corporations
Individuals W, X, Y and Z hold 40%, 20%, 20% and 20% of the voting shares of both Opco A and Opco B. There is no relationship or common interest...
20 February 2008 External T.I. 2007-0246721E5 F - Related Corporations
Two unrelated individuals (X and Z) are the trustees of two trusts for the families of X or of Z, and of asset protection trusts for X or Z. All...
21 June 2004 External T.I. 2004-0074851E5 F - Allocation de retraite
Whether severance that became payable to the taxpayer was a retiring allowance turned on whether the municipality who terminated her was related...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 248 - Subsection 248(1) - Retiring Allowance | severance was a retiring allowance even though the employee was hired by another municipality that had agreed to take over the municipal functions of her first employer | 366 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 60 - Paragraph 60(j.1) - Subparagraph 60(j.1)(ii) - Clause 60(j.1)(ii)(C) | unrelated person who has assumed a severance payment obligation is treated as paying the severance on behalf of the “employer” who terminated | 180 |
Income Tax Technical News, No. 16, 8 March 1999
Discussion of Duha Printers case.
27 October 1994 External T.I. 9424545 - PROFIT SHARING PLAN FOR CORPORATE PARTNER
The concept of indirect control includes the situation where the intermediate entity is a partnership rather than a corporation. For this purpose...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(c) | controlling partner controls partnership subs | 55 |
9 August 1994 External T.I. 9333125 - CAPITAL GAINS EXEMPTION
The respective corporations of a husband and wife together hold 100% and 40%, respectively, of Opco 1 and Opco 2 "through" a general partnership...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - 101-110 - Section 110.6 - Subsection 110.6(1) - Qualified Small Business Corporation Share | 164 |
8 January 1992 Memorandum (Tax Window, No. 15, p. 9, ¶1685)
Where a court-appointed receiver takes control of the assets of A Co. and transfers those assets to a wholly-owned subsidiary (B Co.) before a...
23 April 1991 T.I. (Tax Window, No. 2, p. 28, ¶1214)
Two wholly-owned subsidiaries of a U.S. corporation are related to each other because a foreign corporation is both a "person" and a "corporation".
Articles
Jeffrey T. Love, Kenneth R. Hauser, "How Various Aggregation Rules Apply to Trusts", 2018 Conference Report (Canadian Tax Foundation), 28: 1-79
Example of issue of whether s. 104(1) embodies a trust in its trustee for related person purposes (pp. 28:40-41)
The interpretive issue is whether...
Subparagraph 251(2)(c)(ii)
See Also
Re A. Zimet Ltd. (1982), 44 C.B.R. (N.S.) 136 (S.C.O.)
Two bankrupt corporations were related to a third corporation notwithstanding that two trusts were interposed as majority shareholders of the...
Administrative Policy
19 June 2002 External T.I. 2002-0120035 F - Non Arm's Length Corporations
Two corporations which each were controlled by a brother were related pursuant to s. 251(2)(c)(ii).
Subparagraph 251(2)(c)(vi)
Administrative Policy
S1-F5-C1 - Related Persons and Dealing at Arm's Length
Example 4. Mr. X, Mr. Y and Mr. Z are an unrelated group that controls XYZ Co. Their spouses, Mrs. X, Mrs. Y and Mrs. Z are an unrelated group...
Subsection 251(3) - Corporations related through a third corporation
Administrative Policy
10 October 2014 October APFF Roundtable Q. 17, 2014-0538071C6 F - 2014 APFF Roundtable, Q. 17 - Related Group
Mr. A and Mr. C are both related to Mr. B, but Mr. A is not related to Mr. C. Each of Mr. A, Mr. B and Mr. C wholly-owns Aco, Bco and Cco,...
S1-F5-C1 - Related Persons and Dealing at Arm's Length
Facts. A and B are sisters. Each of A and B has an adult child, being C and D, respectively. Each of A, B, C and D owns all of the issued...
13 March 1990 T.I. (August 1990 Access Letter, ¶1394)
Where two brothers (A and B) each have a son (C and D), and each of the foregoing owns all the shares of A Ltd., B Ltd., C Ltd. and D Ltd.,...
Articles
Marc N. Ton-That, "Deemed Relationships: A More Restrictive View", Corporate Structures and Groups, Vol. IX, No. 4, 1997, p. 237
Discussion of whether s.251(3) applies for purposes of the Act.
Subsection 251(3.1) - Relation where amalgamation or merger
See Also
Dow Chemical Canada Inc. v. The Queen, 2007 DTC 1701, 2007 TCC 668
The taxpayer was formed on the amalgamation of two corporations, one of which ("UCCI") had previously incurred interest-bearing indebtedness to a...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 78 - Subsection 78(1) | 128 |
Administrative Policy
S4-F7-C1 - Amalgamations of Canadian Corporations
1.32 …[S]ubsection 251(3.1) deems the new corporation formed on an amalgamation to be related to (and, therefore, not deal at arm's length...
11 November 1993 Memorandum (Tax Window, No. 30, p. 3, ¶2482)
Where a corporation (A) is owned equally by three other corporations (X, Y and Z) who do not deal with one another at arm's length and do not act...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 55 - Subsection 55(3) - Paragraph 55(3)(b) | 80 |
Subsection 251(4) - Definitions concerning groups
Related Group
Cases
Atomic Truck Cartage Ltd. v. The Queen, 86 DTC 6032, [1985] 2 CTC 21, [1985] DTC 5427 (FCTD)
The phrase "group of persons" in s.251(4)(a) refers to a group of two or more persons.
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(1) - Paragraph 256(1)(e) | 123 |
Subsection 251(5) - Control by related groups, options, etc.
Paragraph 251(5)(a)
Administrative Policy
26 October 2010 External T.I. 2010-0363341E5 - Related corporations
Grandfather has 42% of the voting rights for Aco and his son has the balance of 58% of the voting rights. Grandchildren (who thus are related to...
Paragraph 251(5)(b)
Cases
Durocher v. Canada, 2016 FCA 299
A holding company (“RJCG”) held by the taxpayers through family trusts was the sole common shareholder of “Gestion Lagarde,” which was a...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Interpretation Act - Section 8.1 | Tax Court can review validity of contract in reviewing assessment | 137 |
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Illegality | proper for the Tax Court to pass on the alleged nullity of a contract in the context of passing on the correctness of an assessment | 251 |
The Queen v. Lusita Holdings, 84 D.T.C 6346, [1984] CTC 335 (FCA)
An individual ("Gustav") was one of two trustees in various trusts which held a majority of the voting shares of Lusita Holdings. Although Gustav...
Rostal Sales Agency Ltd. v. The Queen, 83 DTC 5036, [1983] CTC 5 (FCTD)
The settlor of a trust did not have any right to control the voting rights of shares held by the trust because he did not have the power under the...
Toric Optical Ltd. v. The Queen, 78 DTC 6310, [1978] CTC 436 (FCTD)
An individual agreed with a company ("Imperial") that in the event of the individual's prolonged illness, retirement or death, the individual...
Viking Food Products Ltd. v. The MNR, 67 DTC 5067, [1967] CTC 101 (Ex Ct)
The taxpayer was controlled by an individual and the individual's father and a second corporation ("Empire") was controlled by the individual's...
See Also
ARTV Inc. v. Agence du revenu du Québec, 2016 QCCQ 8757 (Cour du Québec)
The rate of health premium tax to which ARTV Inc. (“ARTV”) was subject (under the Loi sur la régie de l'assurance maladie du Québec) turned...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Interpretation Act - Section 8.1 | tax law superimposed on the general law | 160 |
Lyrtech RD Inc. v. The Queen, 2013 DTC 1147 [at 820], 2013 TCC 12, aff'd 2014 FCA 267
In order to generate refundable investment tax credits for research and development expenditures, a Canadian public corporation ("Lyrtech")...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(5.1) | de facto control by public company even though de jure control by trust | 360 |
Ekamant Canada Inc. v. The Queen, 2010 DTC 1039 [at 2741], 2009 TCC 408
The taxpayer was held 25% by a Canadian individual ("Côté") and three US family members. The four acquired the taxpayer with the understanding...
Sedona Networks Corporation v. The Queen, 2006 DTC 2486, 2006 TCC 80
Paragraph 251(5)(b), which deemed a shareholder to be in the same position in relation to control of a corporation as if the shareholder owned...
H.T. Hoy Holdings Ltd. v. R., 97 DTC 1180, [1997] 2 CTC 2874 (TCC)
An arrangement under which the majority of the voting shares of a company were not turned over to another corporation ("Cloutier") until all of...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(c) | common goal but distinct interests | 121 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 55 - Subsection 55(4) | 50 |
Hudson's Investment Co. (London) Ltd. v. MNR, 68 DTC 83 (TAB)
An individual (Shapiro) was the shareholder of all the shares of Richard Shapiro Limited ("RSL") and of one-half of the common shares of the...
Administrative Policy
20 August 2002 External T.I. 2002-0145225 F - Contingent Right to Acquire Shares
Situation 1
The shareholders' agreement between the five equal shareholders of Opco provides an obligation of each to sell its Opco shares...
11 October 2019 APFF Roundtable Q. 11, 2019-0812701C6 F - Paragraph 251(5)(b) and convertible debenture
Opco, a mooted Canadian-controlled private corporation, is capitalized with 1 million common shares, with a fair market value (FMV) of $2 million,...
11 May 2017 Internal T.I. 2016-0665931I7 - Related to participating employer
Respecting where two unrelated individuals each held exactly 50% of the (voting common) shares of the employer, CRA first noted that under Duha...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Regulations - Regulation 8000 - Subsection 8300(1) - Individual Pension PLan | two unrelated 50% shareholders potentially could both be related to the corporation based on Duha USA rights and s. 251(5)(b) rights | 295 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(2) - Paragraph 251(2)(b) - Subparagraph 251(2)(b)(i) | under Duha, a 50% shareholder potentially can have de jure control | 247 |
7 July 2015 External T.I. 2014-0552711E5 - Application of paragraph 251(5)(b)
In a letter of intent ("LOI") for the purchase of shares provides, the seller and purchaser agree to enter into a purchase agreement following the...
4 February 2015 External T.I. 2015-0565741E5 - Canadian-controlled private corporation
As a condition to distributing shares of Aco to the beneficiaries of a testamentary trust of which it was sole trustee, the trustee ("Pubco"),...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 12 - Subsection 12(11) - Investment Contract | indemnity agreement was not "indebtedness" | 47 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(6) | s. 256(6) does not protect a company's CCPC status where its shares are pledged to a pubco to secure an indemnity, not debt | 235 |
S1-F5-C1 - Related Persons and Dealing at Arm's Length
1.28 [P]aragraph 251(5)(b)… will not normally be applied solely because the applicable shareholder agreement contains: a right of first...
27 March 2014 External T.I. 2014-0524851E5 F - Deemed year-end and CPCC status
On December 1, B Corporation (a CCPC) makes a binding offer (to which s. 251(5)(b) applies) to purchase all the shares of A Corporation whose...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 249 - Subsection 249(3.1) | Ekamant: s. 251(5)(b) does not vitiate actual control by share owner | 220 |
14 June 2010 Internal T.I. 2010-0366611I7 F - Determination of CCPC Status
CRA found that the sole beneficiary (the “Beneficiary”) of a resident trust holding Class A voting shares of a mooted Canadian-controlled...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - General Concepts - Agency | application of Kinguk Trawl test of agency | 165 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 125 - Subsection 125(7) - Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation - Paragraph (b) | agreement was not a USA since it did not contain an outright transfer of the powers of the directors to the shareholders | 549 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(5.1) | non-resident shareholder with 60%+ economic interest, extensive veto rights and responsibility for future funding of R&D work had de facto control | 457 |
16 March 2006 External T.I. 2006-0167361E5 F - Options et droits - Alinéa 251(5)b)
CRA confirmed that the exceptions in s. 251(5)(b) do not apply where an individual is merely "insolvent" without being “bankrupt,” which...
28 April 2005 External T.I. 2005-0121951E5 - Put Options and Call Options
As s.251(5)(b) can be applied even though the right to acquire shares may be dependent on multiple contingencies, a call option to acquire shares...
16 June 2003 External T.I. 2003-0020895 F - Association/Convertible Property
Parent Inc., Invest1 Inc. and Invest2 Inc. hold, respectively, 35, 15 and 15 Class A common shares (being all the shares) of XYZ Inc. However,...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(1.4) - Paragraph 256(1.4)(a) | where multiple debenture holders hold convertible debentures, s. 256(1.4)(a) is to be applied as if all the debentures were exercised (so that each debenture holder is diluted by the others) | 190 |
29 April 2003 External T.I. 2003-0004255 - CALU Conference 2003 Meaning of Control
A owns 80% of the shares of Corporation A and B owns all of the shares of Corporation B and 20% of the shares of Corporation A. A and B enter into...
7 January 2003 External T.I. 2002-0133675 - Cash Call Provisions & Contingent Rts
Ss.251(5)(b) and 256(1.4) applied to a shareholders agreement that provided that where one of the shareholders failed to advance money to the...
5 December 2002 External T.I. 2002-0172315 F - Contingent Right to Acquire Shares
The three equal unrelated individual shareholders of Opco (Messrs. A, B and C) were parties to a unanimous shareholder agreement that provided for...
1998 Strategy Institute Round Table, Q. 11, No. 8M17920
The position of RC respecting Alberta powers of attorney also applies to Ontario continuing powers of attorney for property, i.e., the attorney is...
17 October 1996 External T.I. 9623675 - ENDURING POWER OF ATTORNEY
Where an enduring power of attorney becomes effective solely on the permanent disability of the donor, ss.251(5)(b) and 256(1.4)(a) do not apply...
19 July 1996 External T.I. 9607465 - CANADIAN CONTROLLED PRIVATE CORPORATION
Discussion of various scenarios under which shares of what may be a CCPC are held indirectly by a public company through a partnership. The...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 125 - Subsection 125(7) - Income of the Corporation for the Year From an Active Business | 50 |
8 February 1995 External T.I. 9421285 - CONTINGENT RIGHT TO ACQUIRE SHARES
Where two shareholders holding a minority of the Class A voting shares of a corporation, but all of the Class B non-voting shares representing...
12 January 1993 T.I. (Tax Window, No. 28, p. 21, ¶2388)
Where a widow is the sole beneficiary of her husband's estate and all the shares of a corporation previously owned by her husband are held by an...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(c) | 67 |
Harris, "Insight into the 1991 Revenue Canada Round Table Discussion", 29 July 1992, Q. 24
"Where shares of a corporation are owned by a trust, the Department's general position is that paragraph 251(5)(b) will only apply where the...
92 C.M.TC - Q.8
Although it is RC's position that s.251(5)(b) does not apply in the case of a right of first refusal and normally does not apply to a shotgun...
19 March 1992 T.I. (Tax Window, No. 15, p. 15, ¶1705)
Where a shareholder agreement provides one shareholder with an option to acquire the shares of another shareholder on certain specified events of...
18 October 1991 T.I. (Tax Window, No. 11, p. 19, ¶1529)
A corporation holding a large block of preferred shares which become voting in the event of default by the issuer corporation (e.g., the failure...
8 January 1991 External T.I. 7-913477
By virtue of s.251(5)(b), a court-appointed receiver "may control the shares of [the corporation] as its position is somewhat akin to that of a...
30 May 1990 T.I. (October 1990 Access Letter, ¶1493)
S.251(5)(b) will apply to a shareholders agreement governing the consequences of the withdrawal of a shareholder from a corporation where it is...
30 April 1990 TI C-9132 (September 1990 Access Letter, ¶1438)
S.251(5)(b) does not apply to a "put" right.
21 February 1990 T.I. (July 1990 Access Letter, ¶1349)
"A permanent disability for purposes of paragraph 256(1.4)(a) and (b) and subparagraphs 251(5)(b)(i) and (ii), would involve a disability which...
18 December 1989 Decision Summary (May 1990 Access Letter, ¶1220)
The acquisition of shares by an estate from a deceased person is a non-arm's length transaction.
88 C.R. - Q.42
Where an agreement to purchase the shares of a corporation is entered into well in advance of the actual closing, RC will apply s.251(5)(b) at the...
79 C.R. - Q.38
RC does not apply s.251(5)(b) unless both parties clearly have either a right or an obligation to buy or sell.
IT-64R2 "Corporations: Association and Control" under "Options"
S.251(5)(b) does not apply to rights of first refusal and to shotgun arrangements.
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 249 - Subsection 249(4) | 5 |
Articles
Raj Juneja, Pierre Bourgeois, "International Tax Issues That Get in the Way of Doing Business", 2019 Conference Report (Canadian Tax Foundation), 36:1 – 42
Not engaged merely by support agreement or arrangement agreement
- The entering into of a support agreement or an arrangement agreement prior to...
Subparagraph 251(5)(b)(i)
See Also
CO2 Solution Technologies Inc. v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 286, aff'd sub nom. Bresse Syndics Inc. acting for the bankruptcy of CO2 Solution Technologies Inc. v. The Queen, 2021 FCA 115
A high-tech public company (CO2 Public) carried on its SR&ED through a private company (CO2 Technologies) that was held by a discretionary trust...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 125 - Subsection 125(7) - Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation - Paragraph (a) | a declaration of trust’s requiring the trustees to be the Pubco directors gave Pubco de jure and de facto control of a trust investment | 677 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(5.1) | a declaration of trust requiring the trustees to be the Pubco directors gave Pubco de facto control of a trust sub | 248 |
Deans Knight Income Corporation v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 76, rev'd 2021 FCA 160
The taxpayer, a public company which had largely ceased carrying on a drug research business, had “Tax Attributes,” including SR&ED credits...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 245 - Subsection 245(4) | the absence of an acquisition of effective control of a Lossco also demonstrated an absence of s. 245(4) abuse | 522 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(8) | loss streaming rules are conditioned on an acquisition of effective control | 132 |
Administrative Policy
18 March 2019 GST/HST Interpretation 186839 - Personnes morales étroitement liées
All the shareholders of a corporation entered into a unanimous shareholders agreement (USA) that stripped away all the management powers of the...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 128 - Subsection 128(4) | USA of shareholders of parent corporation stripped it of its qualifying voting control of its subsidiaries | 230 |
6 October 2017 APFF Roundtable Q. 17, 2017-0709171C6 F - Arm's length determination
X, who is the sole shareholder of a CCPC, sells 25% of his shares to Acquireco, whose two shareholders (both key employees) are his son (as to...
24 March 2017 External T.I. 2016-0662381E5 F - Control - unanimous shareholders agreement
The only voting and participating shares of a Canadian corporation ("Opco") are held 50% by a non-resident, and 50% by three Canadian residents. ...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(5) - Paragraph 251(5)(b) - Subparagraph 251(5)(b)(ii) | no application if non-resident under USA cannot control board decision to redeem residents’ shares – applies if automatic redemption requirement | 470 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 125 - Subsection 125(7) - Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation | non-resident would control notwithstanding USA board appointment right of residents due to its secondary call right on their shares or right to require corp to honour automatic redemption clause | 305 |
7 October 2016 APFF Roundtable Q. 7, 2016-0652971C6 F - Paragraph 251(5)(b) and subsection 256(1.4)
CRA did not consider there to be a right (including a contingent right) to, or to acquire, shares where the shareholders’ agreement for a...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(1.4) - Paragraph 256(1.4)(a) | does not include right to find a 3rd party purchaser for another’s shares | 129 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(5) - Paragraph 251(5)(b) - Subparagraph 251(5)(b)(ii) | may include right arising after triggering of event over which no control | 274 |
19 May 2010 Internal T.I. 2008-0279441I7 F - Canadian-controlled private corporation
During the relevant taxation years of Corporation A (which had claimed the small business deduction), its shares were held equally by Corporation...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 125 - Subsection 125(7) - Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation - Paragraph (a) | future acquisition right under a USA of 50% Canadian shareholder gave its non-resident shareholder de jure control of underlying corporation | 237 |
28 September 2006 External T.I. 2006-0197841E5 F - Shareholders agreement & 256(1.4)
Four unrelated individuals (A, B, C and D) each hold 25% of the shares (being common shares) of Opco through their respective wholly-owned holding...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(1.4) - Paragraph 256(1.4)(a) | s. 256(1.4) technically applies where each 25% shareholder has an obligation to acquire shares of another shareholder offering its shares | 287 |
10 November 2004 External T.I. 2004-0096991E5 F - Shareholders' agreement
CRA indicated that Aco, owned by X, was deemed by virtue of s. 256(1.4)(a) to be associated with Zco, owned equally by X and Y, where the Zco...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(1.4) - Paragraph 256(1.4)(a) | Aco, owned by X, is associated with Zco, owned equally by X and Y, where the shareholders’ agreement provides that either can acquire the other’s shares on the latter’s disability | 178 |
29 October 2001 External T.I. 2001-0092035 F - association related persons
In explaining the statement in 9820337 F that the position regarding s. 251(5)(b) in 9421285 E is not relevant to s. 256(1.4)(a), CCRA...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(1.4) - Paragraph 256(1.4)(a) | crucially, s. 256(1.4)(a), unlike s. 251(5)(b)(i), deems the affected shares to be issued and outstanding | 121 |
Articles
Jeffrey T. Love, Kenneth R. Hauser, "How Various Aggregation Rules Apply to Trusts", 2018 Conference Report (Canadian Tax Foundation), 28: 1-79
Whether s. 251(5)(b)(i) deems a beneficiary to own shares held by the trust (pp. 28:48-49)
An interpretive issue in the trust context is whether...
Subparagraph 251(5)(b)(ii)
Administrative Policy
24 March 2017 External T.I. 2016-0662381E5 F - Control - unanimous shareholders agreement
The only voting and participating shares of a Canadian corporation ("Opco") are held 50% by a non-resident, and 50% by three Canadian residents. ...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(5) - Paragraph 251(5)(b) - Subparagraph 251(5)(b)(i) | highly contingent secondary call right of a non-resident on shares of minority residents undercuts for CCPC purposes their USA right to appoint half the board | 601 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 125 - Subsection 125(7) - Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation | non-resident would control notwithstanding USA board appointment right of residents due to its secondary call right on their shares or right to require corp to honour automatic redemption clause | 305 |
7 October 2016 APFF Roundtable Q. 7, 2016-0652971C6 F - Paragraph 251(5)(b) and subsection 256(1.4)
Franchisor and Manager each hold 50% of the shares (being common shares) of Franchisee. The shareholders’ agreement for Franchisee (a) provides,...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(1.4) - Paragraph 256(1.4)(a) | does not include right to find a 3rd party purchaser for another’s shares | 129 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(5) - Paragraph 251(5)(b) - Subparagraph 251(5)(b)(i) | right to find 3rd party purchaser | 72 |
16 March 2011 External T.I. 2010-0380571E5 F - Application de 251(5)b)(ii) et 256(1.4)b)
Does 9807875 E, wherein CRA indicated that s. 256(1.4)(b) would not generally apply where the triggering of the event is beyond the control of...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 256 - Subsection 256(1.4) - Paragraph 256(1.4)(b) | potential application even where no control over triggering of precondition | 95 |
Paragraph 251(5)(c)
See Also
Côté-Létourneau v. The Queen, 2010 DTC 1116 [at 3092], 2007 TCC 91
The taxpayers (a husband and wife) were not dealing at arm's length with a corporation ("29061") whose shareholder was a trust of which they and...
Naples v. Martin Estate, [1987] 1 WWR 52 (BCSC)
"Children" in the Wills Variation Act (B.C.) did not include stepchildren.
Subsection 251(6) - Blood relationship, etc.
Paragraph 251(6)(a)
See Also
Dreger v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 25
The taxpayers were the named beneficiaries of a life income fund held by their late father, who died on June 8, 2011, and with the distributions...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 160 - Subsection 160(1) | a distribution from a deceased father’s fund to his surviving children was a related-person transfer | 138 |
Diktakis v. The Queen, 2016 TCC 262 (Informal Procedure)
Smith J found that a taxpayer was related under s. 251(6)(a) to a two year old child who was the result of relations between the taxpayer’s...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 254 - Subsection 254(2) - Paragraph 254(2)(g) | occupation of the new home could have been through a 2-year half sister and her mother | 276 |
Administrative Policy
12 July 2018 External T.I. 2018-0755471E5 - Half-brothers and related persons
In finding that two half-brothers (with the same father and different mothers) were “related persons” as defined in s. 251(2)(a), CRA referred...
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(2) - Paragraph 251(2)(a) | half-siblings are related | 59 |
S1-F5-C1 - Related Persons and Dealing at Arm's Length
1.13 … [A]n individual's niece, nephew, aunt, uncle or cousin is not connected by blood, marriage or common-law partnership or adoption to the...
13 April 1995 External T.I. 9429945 - RELATED AND ASSOCIATED
A half-brother and half-sister are connected by blood relationship.
However, the half-brother would not be connected by blood with his stepmother...
Paragraph 251(6)(b)
See Also
May Estate v. MNR, 88 DTC 1189, [1988] 1 CTC 2303 (TCC)
A husband was not related to his deceased wife.
| Locations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
|---|---|---|
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(1) - Paragraph 251(1)(c) | estate did not deal at arm's length with testotor re bequest | 142 |
| Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 251 - Subsection 251(2) - Paragraph 251(2)(a) | 14 |
Administrative Policy
S1-F5-C1 - Related Persons and Dealing at Arm's Length
The husbands of two sisters are deemed to be connected to each other by marriage pursuant to s. 251(6)(b).
2 August 1995 External T.I. 9508765 - RELATED PERSONS
The wife of a man is connected by marriage with the wife of that man's brother.
Paragraph 251(6)(c)
Administrative Policy
S1-F5-C1 - Related Persons and Dealing at Arm's Length
1.16 …For a de facto adoption to exist, generally the adoptive parent must exercise parental care and guidance on a continuing basis.