Canada v. Villa Ste-Rose Inc., 2021 FCA 35 -- attach -- Resolving Ambiguity
provision was not clear and unequivocal, so that purpose and policy could be resorted to
Resolving Ambiguity
Fortnum v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 126 (Informal Procedure) -- attach -- Resolving Ambiguity
residual presumption in taxpayer's favour
R. v. Filteau, 85 DTC 5249, [1985] 1 CTC 19 (Que. C.A.) -- attach -- Resolving Ambiguity
The Queen v. Manley, 85 DTC 5150, [1985] 1 CTC 186 (FCA) -- attach -- Resolving Ambiguity
Harris Steel Group Inc. v. MNR, 85 DTC 5140, [1985] 1CTC 181 (FCA) -- attach -- Resolving Ambiguity
Bristol-Myers Canada Inc. v. D.MNR for Customs and Excise, 85 DTC 5024, [1985] 1 CTC 23 (FCA) -- attach -- Resolving Ambiguity
Cominco Ltd. v. The Queen, 84 DTC 6535, [1984] CTC 548 (FCTD) -- attach -- Resolving Ambiguity
Saskatchewan Wheat Pool v. The Queen, 85 DTC 5034, [1985] 1 CTC 31 (FCA) -- attach -- Resolving Ambiguity
Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. Ltd. v. The Queen, 79 DTC 5401, [1979] CTC 509, [1980] 1 SCR 670 -- attach -- Resolving Ambiguity
Harvey C. Smith Drugs Ltd. v. The Queen, 92 DTC 6349, [1992] 1 CTC 325 (FCTD), aff'd 95 DTC 5026 (FCA) -- attach -- Resolving Ambiguity
Pages
