Ease of Administration

Table of Contents

Cases

Canada v. Cheema, 2018 FCA 45

In finding that the purchase of a new home did not qualify for the new housing rebate because one of the named purchasers in the purchase...

The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 254 - Subsection 254(2) - Paragraph 254(2)(b) third party who did not intend to occupy was liable at the purchase agreement time 355
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 133 s. 133 deemed an acquisition of future home on co-purchaser's signing purchase agreement, notwithstanding that no beneficial interest received on closing 268
Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Ordinary Meaning Court should not depart from usual interpretation principles in seeking a sensible result 128
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Regulations - New Harmonized Value-Added Tax System Regulations, No. 2 - Section 40 co-purchaser with no intended beneficial interest was required to satisfy ETA s. 254(2) rules 171
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - 101-110 - Section 104 - Subsection 104(1) "legal acquirer" rather than intended beneficial owner was the purchaser 219

65302 British Columbia Ltd. v. Canada, 99 DTC 5799, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 804

After noting that the minority proposed that the distinction between deductible and non-deductible fines be determined on a case-by-case basis,...

The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.