Income Tax Severed Letters - 2001-02-16

Miscellaneous

2 March 2000 2000-0M20360 - PRESENTATION ON INDIAN TAXATION

Unedited CRA Tags
81(1)(A)

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department. Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

The Committee for the Advancement of Native Employment
DIAND
March 2, 2000

Paper presented by Roberta Albert

Introduction

Ruling

12 February 2001 Ruling 2000-0048443 - Taxability of Pension Income

Unedited CRA Tags
81(1)(i) 56(1)(a)

Principal Issues:
Will a pension received under subsection 11(2) of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Superannuation Act ("RCMPSA") be non-taxable if the pensioner also receives a pension under subsection 32(1) of the RCMPSA?

Position: No.

Reasons:
Paragraph 81(1)(i) of the Act only exempts benefits paid under section 32 or 33 of the RCMPSA. Benefits payable under other sections of the RCMPSA are taxable under paragraph 56(1)(a) of the Act.

2001 Ruling 2000-0054343 - RRSP TRANSFER DIVORCE SETTLEMENT

Unedited CRA Tags
149(16)

Principal Issues:
1. In the circumstances of the case, will a transfer of an amount from an RRSP of a former spouse of an individual to the individual's RRSP in settlement of future support payments satisfy the requirements of 146(16) of the Act, where the transfer is the consequence of a court order issued because of the former spouse's default in paying support?
2. Legal costs were incurred to obtain the above noted settlement and enforce payment of past due spousal support payments. The individual proposes to apportion the costs incurred to the enforcement of the pre-existing entitlements based on the proportion of the total award that is for arrears and interest and has requested a ruling that this amount will be deductible in the year it is paid.

Position:
1. Yes.
2. The court awarded costs are normally applied to reduce the amount that may be deducted. However, because there is little likelihood payment of the costs awarded will be received, we will allow a deduction of the amount allocated, on a pro rata basis, to enforce the existing obligations. Any amount received under the award of costs must be reported as income in the year received.

Reasons:
1. The payment will be made as a result of a series of court orders the effect of which is to vary the terms of the original divorce decree relating to the division of property between the former spouses in settlement of rights arising out of, or on the breakdown of their marriage.
2. The pro rata calculation is a reasonable method of allocating the costs incurred.

2000 Ruling 2000-0051223 - UNFUNDED SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN

Unedited CRA Tags
56(1)(a)(i)

Principal Issues: Supplemental retirement arrangement (unfunded pension plan).

Position: Not an SDA, RCA or EBP

Reasons: Not funded, salary deferral purpose not met.

2000 Ruling 2000-0052363 - LOSS CONSOLIDATION

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(c) 18(6)

Position:

2000 Ruling 2000-0017683 - XXXXXXXXXX

Unedited CRA Tags
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX

Principal Issues:
A. Are XXXXXXXXXX generated by XXXXXXXXXX of XXXXXXXXXX and XXXXXXXXXX under the Plan considered to be income from a source?
B. Are XXXXXXXXXX a taxable benefit where the XXXXXXXXXX is the employer of the XXXXXXXXXX ?
C. Are amounts paid from the XXXXXXXXXX of the XXXXXXXXXX of the XXXXXXXXXX or the XXXXXXXXXX deductible as RRSP premiums?
D. Where an XXXXXXXXXX is purchased for a XXXXXXXXXX who is under 18 years of age , and the XXXXXXXXXX directs that the XXXXXXXXXX be contributed to his/her RRSP, will the XXXXXXXXXX be entitled to a deduction for that contribution?

Position:
A. No
B. No
C. Yes, subject to limitations in subsections 146(5) and 146(5.1)
D. Yes, subject to limitations in 146(5)

Reasons:
A. No source.
B. Evidence that XXXXXXXXXX arise from XXXXXXXXXX in the plan, not from employment. Non-employees can also receive XXXXXXXXXX .
C. XXXXXXXXXX designates XXXXXXXXXX who is entitled to XXXXXXXXXX arising from XXXXXXXXXX directs the XXXXXXXXXX on where to transfer the XXXXXXXXXX amounts so that it may be considered that the XXXXXXXXXX "paid" the amount as required in the definition of "premium" in subsection 146(1).
D. XXXXXXXXXX directs the XXXXXXXXXX on where to transfer the XXXXXXXXXX so that it may be considered that the XXXXXXXXXX "paid" the amount as required in the definition of "premium" in subsection 146(1).

2000 Ruling 2000-0036423 - XXXXXXXXXX

Unedited CRA Tags
XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX

Principal Issues: Will the amendments to the facts and the proposed transactions in ruling 2000-001768 prevent the rulings from applying?

Position: No, but minor change in the wording of one ruling.

Reasons: The amendments are not substantive.

2000 Ruling 2000-0057363 - FLEX PLAN USING DEMUTUALIZATION PROCEEDS

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)(a) 5(1)

Principal Issues: Whether the establishment of a flexible benefit plan using the proceeds from the demutualization of life insurers where the proceeds relate to group insurance polices for the Taxpayer's employees will result in the employees being considered to have constructively received income. Some of these group insurance policies were employee-paid or cost-shared between the employees and the Taxpayer.

Position: No.

Reasons: The Income Tax Act contains specific rules to address the taxation of demutualization benefits. In some cases, there may be a flow-through of benefits to employees if the employer elects under subsection 139.1(16). However, where the employer does not elect, as in this case, the proceeds are to be taxed in the employer's hands pursuant to subsection 139.1(4).

2000 Ruling 2000-0037233 - EMPLOYER PROVIDED COMPUTERS

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)(a)

Principal Issues: Whether provision of computer and Internet access to employees constitutes taxable benefit to employees; whether company can deduct the monthly lease payments required to provide computers to employees

Position: There is no taxable benefit to the employee participants in the program. The company can deduct the monthly lease costs.

Reasons: The computer equipment and Internet access is provided to the employees to enable them to become more computer literate. It falls within the guidelines for General Employment-Related Training set out in Technical News 13 and is consistent with a similar ruling given for a comparable program; the monthly lease costs are a regular business expense deductible in accordance with section 9.

2000 Ruling 2000-0047343 - RETIRING ALLOWANCE VS SALARY CONTINUANCE

Unedited CRA Tags
56(1)(a)(ii) 147.1(1)

Principal Issues:
1) Is the "severance amount" a retiring allowance?
2) Is the amount "compensation" for RPP purposes?

Position:
1) Yes
2) No

Reasons:
1) The amount is a lump-sum payment (not salary continuance). As such, subparagraph 56(1)(a)(ii) applies in priority to subsections 5(1) or 6(1), since subparagraph 56(1)(a)(ii) is the more specific provision.
2) A retiring allowance is not compensation as defined in subsection 147.1(1) of the Act.

1998 Ruling 9808883 F - XXXXXXXXXX - NET VALUE DISTRIBUTION BUTTERFLY

Unedited CRA Tags
55(1) 55(2) 55(3)(b)

Principal Issues:

The client wanted to modify the classification of the properties for the purpose of the butterfly distribution. We modified paragraph 13 of the Rulings number 973221.

Position:

We accepted to reclassify some near cash properties as business properties in the net value distribution.

Reasons:

1998 Ruling 9800323 - DIVIDEND

Unedited CRA Tags
55(2)

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX 980032
XXXXXXXXXX

Attention: XXXXXXXXXX

Dear Sirs:

Re: XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX

Ministerial Correspondence

24 January 2001 Ministerial Correspondence 2000-0060314 - Leave Plan - return to work

Unedited CRA Tags
6801(a)(v)

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

January 24, 2001

XXXXXXXXXX

Dear Colleague:

Thank you for your letter of October 30, 2000, on behalf of your constituent. XXXXXXXXXX, who is concerned about the effect his participation in a deferred salary leave plan (DSLP) may have on his plans for retirement.

24 January 2001 Ministerial Correspondence 2000-0063024 - Retiring Allowance to municipal officials

Unedited CRA Tags
81(3) 60(j.1)

Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the Department.

Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle du ministère.

January 24, 2001

XXXXXXXXXX

Dear Colleague:

Thank you for your correspondence of December 11, 2000, concerning the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency's reply of June 30, 2000, to XXXXXXXXXX, regarding the payment of expense allowances and retiring allowances to elected officials.

10 January 2001 Ministerial Correspondence 2000-0063834 - ASSESSMENTS BINDING

Unedited CRA Tags
152(8)

Principal Issues:
Whether subsection 152(8) permits the Minister to "voluntarily reassess" a taxpayer's return beyond the normal reassessment period.

Technical Interpretation - External

16 February 2001 External T.I. 2001-0067405 - RRSP benefit, fees, withholdings

Unedited CRA Tags
146(8)

Principal Issues:
Are withdrawal fees charged by the RRSP administrator under the terms of the RRSP deducted in determining the amount that has to be included in the annuitant's income under subsection 146(8) of the Act?

Position: Yes.

Reasons:
The withdrawal fees are costs of the RRSP trust. The annuitant only has to include the amount received before withholding taxes in his or her income.

14 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0044895 - CALCULATION OF INSTALMENT INTEREST

Unedited CRA Tags
161(2)

Principal Issues: Why the full amount of instalment interest was charged even though a taxpayer overpaid Canada Pension Plan contributions and Employment Insurance premiums.

Position: CPP contributions and EI premiums do not reduce instalment interest.

Reasons: Based on the law.

14 February 2001 External T.I. 2001-0067315 - EPSP, children, conditions

Unedited CRA Tags
144(1)

Principal Issues:
Can an EPSP be set up for the benefit of the employer's children where the children will only get entitlements under the EPSP if they satisfy certain non-employment related conditions?

Position: Probably not.

Reasons:
The EPSP would have to satisfy subsection 144(1) and we would question whether the arrangement is for the benefit of employees of the business.

14 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0045385 - Municipal Corporations - Subsection 149(1.2)149(1)(d.5)

Unedited CRA Tags
149(1.2)

Principal Issues:
Where a municipal corporation carries on activities outside its geographical municipal boundaries in agreement with other municipalities, would subsection 149(1.2) apply to exclude the income from such activities from the 10% portion of the test provided for in paragraph 149(1)(d.5)?

Position:
Possibly. It is a question of fact whether the requirements of subsection 149(1.2) are met.

Reasons: Legislation

14 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0052695 - Trust Distribution

Unedited CRA Tags
107

Principal Issues: Determine the date of acquisition and the adjusted cost base of a portfolio investment transferred to a Canadian resident beneficiary by a US testamentary trust.

Position: The adjusted cost base of property transferred by a trust to one of its beneficiaries in satisfaction of such beneficiary' capital interest in the trust is to be determined in accordance with subdivisions 107(1) et (2).

Reasons: Subsections 107(1) and (2) and documents E 9629257, E 9824473 and E 9204205.

13 February 2001 External T.I. 2001-0065945 - LEAPS calls and puts, qualified investments

Unedited CRA Tags
146(1)

Principal Issues:
Will LEAPS calls and puts be qualified investments for an RRSP?

Position: Probably not.

Reasons:
In most cases they do not provide the investor with the right to acquire property so the investment would not qualify under 4900(1)(e) of the Regulations.

13 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0053615 - EMPLOYEES MEALS EXPENSES-AMBULANCE DRIVERS

Unedited CRA Tags
8(1)(g) 8(1)(h)

Principal Issues:
Are meal expenses incurred by Emergency Medical Technicians and Paramedics in carrying out the duties required by their employment deductible?

Position:
Depends on the facts but generally they would not be deductible.

Reasons:
For the purposes of subsection 8(1)(g) of the Act, it cannot be considered that an Emergency Medical Technician and Paramedic is an employee of a person whose principal business was passenger transport, even though they may regularly transport patients in an ambulance. Moreover, subsection 8(4) of the Act provides that meal expenses cannot be deducted pursuant to paragraph 8(1)(h) of the Act in computing income from an office or employment unless it was consumed during a period while the taxpayer was required by the taxpayer's duties to be away, for a period of not less than twelve hours, from the municipality where the employer's establishment to which the taxpayer ordinarily reported for work was located and away from the metropolitan area, if there is one, where it was located.

13 February 2001 External T.I. 2001-0064815 - RRSP, non-resident annuitant

Unedited CRA Tags
146(1)

Principal Issues:
Is an RRSP with a non-resident annuitant treated differently than an RRSP with a resident annuitant?

Position: No.

Reasons:
The Act does not restrict the activities of RRSPs with non-resident annuitants.

12 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0056905 F - ALLOCATION POUR FRAIS DE STATIONNEMENT

Unedited CRA Tags
6(1)b) 230(1)

Principales Questions:
1. Est-ce que des allocations versées à des employés pour des frais de stationnement, sans pièces justificatives, seraient acceptées à titre de dépenses déductibles pour l'employeur ?
2. Quel serait le traitement fiscal de l'allocation pour des frais de stationnement du point de vue de l'employé ?

Position Adoptée:
1. Dans la situation présentée, oui.
2. Il s'agit probablement d'allocations imposables selon l'alinéa 6(1)b) de la Loi

12 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0053625 - TUITION TAX CREDITS

Unedited CRA Tags
118.5

Principal Issues: questions on issuance of T2202As

Position: prior positions

Reasons: prior positions

9 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0059605 - INDIANS

Unedited CRA Tags
81(1)(a)

Principal Issues: Taxation of business income, investment income and employment income of a status Indian

Position: Provided only general comments on CCRA position

Reasons: CCRA position

8 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0059975 - Retiring Allowance

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1) 60(j.1)

Principal Issues: Are payments in lieu of notice "retiring allowances"?

Position: No.

Reasons: Such payments are employment income since they are made in lieu of salary for the period of notice.

7 February 2001 External T.I. 2001-0066435 - TRADING SHARES

Unedited CRA Tags
9 38

Principal Issues:
1. Are a corporation's gains and losses from trading non-Canadian securities on a daily, monthly or bimonthly basis accorded the income treatment or the capital treatment?
2. Deduction of operating expenses

Position:
1. Question of fact; but more than likely the gains/losses are on income account.
2. Expenses must be claimed against the income source in respect of which they are incurred

Reasons:
1. IT- 479R
2. T4012, T2 Corporation income tax guide; T4037, Capital gains guide.

6 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0060435 F - Exclusion des frais d'exploration

Unedited CRA Tags
66.1(6)

Principales Questions:
Est-ce que la dépense qu'une société d'exploration minière junior a encourue pour acheter un véhicule tout terrain pour se déplacer dans la propriété minière dans le but d'effectuer l'exploration fait partie des frais d'exploration au Canada, terme défini au paragraphe 66.1(6) de la Loi ?

Position Adoptée:
Cette dépense ne ferait pas partie des frais d'exploration au Canada.

6 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0060715 - Payment of Minimum Amount from an RRIF

Unedited CRA Tags
146.3(1)

Principal Issues:
Is there a requirement to pay the minimum amount out of a RRIF after the death of the annuitant?

Position: No.

Reasons:
There is no requirement to pay the minimum amount after the death of the annuitant. However, any transfer of any amounts received by beneficiaries to the beneficiaries RRSPs or RRIFs must be reduced by the minimum amount that would have otherwise been payable in the year of the transfer.

6 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0058325 - RIGHT OF WAY

Unedited CRA Tags
54 69 251

Principal Issues:

Taxpayer sold principal residence and "hydro right of way property" to Couple A with agreement that "hydro right of way property" would be subdivided from principal residence and sold back to taxpayer for $1. This was not done. Bank was about to foreclose on property so Couple A sold it to some friends, Couple B. Couple B has agreed to honour original agreement and sell "hydro right of way property" back to taxpayer for $1.

Would the sale from Couple B to taxpayer result in a taxable capital gain?

Position TAKEN:

General comments provided.

Reasons:

6 February 2001 External T.I. 2001-0066525 - GIC denominated in foreign currency

Unedited CRA Tags
206(1)
FX-denominated GIC issued by a Canadian bank is a qualified investment, being similar to a bond, debenture, note or mortgage

Principal Issues:
Will a GIC issued by a chartered Canadian bank and denominated in a foreign currency be a foreign property for purposes of Part XI of the Act?

Position: No.

Reasons:
The residency of the issuer of the GIC will determine whether a GIC is Canadian or foreign property. The currency denomination of the GIC will not result in a property being Canadian or foreign property.

6 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0059485 F - DBFT - Sous-traitants - textile

Unedited CRA Tags
125.1

Principales Questions: Les dispositions de l'article 125.1 de la Loi de l'impôt sur le revenu (la " Loi ") s'appliquent-elles à un contribuable qui exploite une entreprise de conception et de distribution de vêtements au Canada mais qui fait effectuer la fabrication de ses produits par un tiers exploitant une entreprise hors du Canada?

Position Adoptée: Question de faits

6 February 2001 External T.I. 2001-0066605 - DSLP, Income Distribution

Unedited CRA Tags
6801(a)

Principal Issues:
Where a single trust is used for all participants in a deferred salary leave plan under paragraph 6801(a) of the Regulations, can the trust include the payments to the employees that are on leave in the year in the distributions that are required under clause 6801(a)(iv)(A) of the Regulations?

Position: No.

Reasons:
Under clause 6801(a)(iv)(A), the trust has to provide that the income earned for the benefit of the employee has to be paid to the employee. This condition would not be satisfied if the trust pays the income to another employee.

6 February 2001 External T.I. 2001-0065445 - Qualifying under the Home Buyers' Plan

Unedited CRA Tags
146.01(1)

Principal Issues:
a) Must an individual be "on title" in order to qualify under the HBP?
b) Must he sign the offer to purchase?

Position:
a) Not necessarily.
b) Not necessarily.

Reasons:
a) Interpretation of the term "acquire" in the definition of "regular eligible amount" in paragraph (c) in subsection 146.01(1). The individual must obtain either legal or beneficial ownership of the property (see IT-437R, par 1, and IT-285R2, par 17).
b) The individual must "enter into an agreement in writing" for the acquisition or construction of the home.

6 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0044095 F - Honoraires - retenue d'impôt non-résident

Unedited CRA Tags
215 212(1)(a) Reg 105 153(1)(g)

Principales Questions:
Un résident canadien doit-il effectuer des retenues d'impôt sur les honoraires de gestion qu'il verse à des contractuels américains relativement à des services rendus aux États-Unis?

Position Adoptée: non

6 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0060385 - Foreign Pension Plans

Unedited CRA Tags
8

Principal Issues:
Deductibility of contributions to a foreign pension plan by a Canadian resident

Position:
Not deductible for Canadian income tax purposes.

Reasons:
Nothing in the Act to allow the deduction and, in this case, the Canada-U.K. Treaty provides no relief.

5 February 2001 External T.I. 2001-0067135 F - Dividend-General

Unedited CRA Tags
84.1

Principales Questions: Est-ce que le paragraphe 84.1(1) de la Loi s'applique dans la présente situation? / Does subsection 84.1(1) of the Act apply in the particular situation?

Position Adoptée: Oui. / Yes.

5 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0061655 - Foreign Property disposal and repurchase

Unedited CRA Tags
206(2)

Principal Issues:
For purposes of section 206, can an RRSP trust sell property in the market (or to the annuitant) at fair market value and immediately repurchase the property to reflect a new "cost amount"?

Position:
Yes, although we have not considered how GAAR might apply.

Reasons:
Reply is based on previous replies on this matter.

5 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0032695 F - Convention fiscale Canada-France

Unedited CRA Tags
212(1)d)(iii) 215

Principales Questions: Est-ce que les paiements effectués en l'espèce sont sujets à l'impôt de la partie XIII compte tenu des dispositions de la Convention fiscale Canada - France? / Whether the payments, in the particular situation, are subject to Part XIII tax, given the dispositions of the Canada - France Tax Convention.

Position Adoptée: Non. / No.

2 February 2001 External T.I. 2001-0067075 - EQAL SETTLEMENT; FORGIVENESS OF DEBT

Unedited CRA Tags
80 53

Principal Issues: Tax consequence of payment of amount to settle litigation regarding non-payment of promissory note to acquire partnership interest.

Position: Possibly capital loss on disposition of partnership interest and application of section 80, but would need to review documents to make determination.

Reasons: questions of fact and law

1 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0049655 F - Transfert entre conjoints de crédit d'impôt

Unedited CRA Tags
118(1)

Principal Issues:
Transfert de crédit d'impôt pour dons de biens culturels entre conjoints.

1 February 2001 External T.I. 2000-0008675 F - Avantage-société devenue imposable

Unedited CRA Tags
15(1)

Principales Questions:
Lors du changement du statut d'une société à but non lucratif sans capital-actions à une société canadienne imposable avec un capital-actions, les membres de la société pourraient-ils souscrire à des actions de la société sans être considérés comme ayant reçu un avantage en vertu du paragraphe 15(1) de la Loi?

Position Adoptée:
Non.

29 January 2001 External T.I. 2001-0066625 - settlement of lawsuit

Unedited CRA Tags
12(1)(g)

Principal Issues: Nature of receipt for settling lawsuit re non payment of royalties.

Position: Question of fact

Reasons: Question of fact

17 January 2001 External T.I. 2000-0062835 - HONG KONG MANDATORY PROVIDENT FUND

Unedited CRA Tags
56(1)(a)(i)

Principal Issues: Will the Mandatory Provident Fund Scheme Ordinance being established as of December 1, 2000 in Hong Kong qualify as a pension for purposes of the Act?

Position: Question of fact.

Reasons: Without a review of the particular plan documents and the facts surrounding a participant's employment, we are not able to provide definitive comments regarding a plan qualifying as a pension plan for purposes of the Act.

6 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0056515 - Audit of transactions subject of ruling

Unedited CRA Tags
152

Principal Issues: How transactions that are the subject of a ruling are audited

Position: See response

Reasons: See response

6 December 2000 External T.I. 2000-0056485 - assumption of excess debt on sec 85 transfer

Unedited CRA Tags
85(1)(b)

Principal Issues: Assumption of debt on section 85 transfer

Position: Paragraph 85(1)(b) can apply

Reasons: Debt assumed as consideration for property transferred

Technical Interpretation - Internal

30 January 2001 Internal T.I. 2000-0036547 - Calculation of resource allowance

Unedited CRA Tags
reg 1204(1) reg 1204(1.1)

Principal Issues: Would, (1) recaptured depreciation under subsection 13(1) of the Act; (2) investments tax credits included in income under paragraphs 12(1)(t) and (v) of the Act; and, (3) charitable donations and political contributions, be included/deducted in determining the income from production and/or processing under subsection 1204 of the Regulations.

Position: (1) and (2): Yes. (3): No

Reasons: A taxpayer's income from the year from a business is the taxpayer's profit determined by Division B of the Act, which includes amounts determined under subsection 13(1) of the Act, and paragraphs 12(1)(v) and (t) of the Act. The recapture provisions of the Act and Regulations are fundamentally adjustments to income of previous years and do not create, in the year of disposal of the asset, some new form or source of income. A recapture of depreciation, to the extent the recapture is in respect of capital cost allowance claimed in computing gross resource profits in prior years, would be included in gross resource profits. Using the same reasoning, an amount under 12(1)(v) that arose due to investments tax credits included under paragraph 37(1)(e), would be included in computing gross resource profits. Amounts determined under paragraphs 12(1)(t) would be included in the taxpayer's income for the year from production and/or processing in computing gross resource profits, to the extent that the amounts are in respect of SR and ED amounts that were deducted under subsection 37(1) of the Act in computing gross resource profits in prior years.
Deductions for charitable donations and political contributions are not deductions in computing income from a business, but, rather, are deductions made in computing taxable income or are deductions from taxes otherwise payable. Since they are not deductions in computing income from a business, they cannot be deducted in calculating gross resource profits or resource profits for resource allowance purposes.

29 January 2001 Internal T.I. 2000-0062827 F - Placement admissible - conjoint de fait

Unedited CRA Tags
252(4) 251(1)6) 4900(12)

Position Adoptée:
Question de fait.

24 January 2001 Internal T.I. 2000-0059517 - DISPOSITION OF PARTNERSHIP AT DEATH

Unedited CRA Tags
53(2)(c) 66.2 66(15)(c)

Principal Issues:
1. What is the adjusted cost base and fair market value of an interest in a partnership at the date of death of partner?

Position:
1. Comments provided re: adjusted cost base. Partnership interest is not a Canadian resource property, therefore 70(5) applies, not 70(5.2). Valuation question - consider looking at the net asset value.

Reasons:
1. In accordance with legislation.

17 January 2001 Internal T.I. 2000-0061157 - Inherited IRA, estate taxes

Unedited CRA Tags
56(1)(a)(i)(c.1)

Principal Issues: 1) Will an amount received from a taxpayer's deceased father's IRA be included in income for Canadian tax purposes? 2) Can a Canadian taxpayer take a deduction for foreign estate taxes paid by the taxpayer's deceased father's estate?

Position: 1) Yes. 2) No.

Reasons: 1) 56(1)(a)(i)(C.1) 2) Nothing in the Act to allow for the deduction.

16 January 2001 Internal T.I. 2000-0060557 - Damages, RRIF, Investment Advice

Unedited CRA Tags
146.3(1)

Principal Issues: Could an investment advisor pay an amount to a RRIF in respect of damages sustained from poor investment advice provided one of its former employees?

Position: Question of fact.

Reasons: There are situations where this is allowed but we would want to review all of the facts before approving any proposed settlement.

14 December 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0059387 - Partnership

Unedited CRA Tags
96

Principal Issues: whether partnership

Position: yes

Reasons: contract shows partnership at common law