Search - 侵犯公民个人信息罪 交易明细 计算条数
Results 141 - 150 of 8016 for 侵犯公民个人信息罪 交易明细 计算条数
Commentary
Rectification & Rescission - Commentary
An attempt by the parties themselves to rectify their transactions on a nunc pro tunc basis may not be respected as having retroactive effect for tax purposes (see S & D), although the parties' self-help rectification in AES (replacing most of a promissory note with preferred shares) was effectively ratified after the fact in a Quebec context. ... However, in S & D, transactions were rectified so as to minimize adverse tax consequences to the extent consistent with the commercial intent of the parties, even though there had not been a continuing intention of the parties to avoid tax. ...
Conference summary
25 November 2012 Roundtable, 2013-0479401C6 F - Employés et Achat Ltée commentaires panel ARC -- summary under Paragraph 251(1)(c)
25 November 2012 Roundtable, 2013-0479401C6 F- Employés et Achat Ltée commentaires panel ARC-- summary under Paragraph 251(1)(c) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 251- Subsection 251(1)- Paragraph 251(1)(c) Buyco that is formed by employer to purchases departing employees’ shares is NAL In order to facilitate the disposition of shares of departing employees who had purchased their shares under an employee share ownership plan (ESOP), Opco forms and injects funds into a new company (Buyco), which uses those funds to purchase the employee’s Opco shares. ... This … is consistent with … 2007-0243171C6, 2002-0166655 and 2004-0103061E5 … Petro-Canada and … RMM …. ...
Decision summary
G E Financial Investments v.The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, [2021] UKFTT 0210 (Tax Chamber), ultimately aff'd [2024] EWCA Civ 797 -- summary under Article 4
G E Financial Investments v.The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs, [2021] UKFTT 0210 (Tax Chamber), ultimately aff'd [2024] EWCA Civ 797-- summary under Article 4 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 4 a deemed US resident was not a US treaty resident A US company (“GEFI Inc.”) and UK company (“GEFI”) in the GE group formed a Delaware LP (“LP”) with GEFI Inc. as the 1% general partner and GEFI as the 99% limited partner. ... In my judgment, this is the correct approach as it takes into account the common feature or similarity of domicile, residence, citizenship etc, in the context of the Convention, ie that they are all criteria providing, in addition to the imposition of a worldwide liability to tax, a “ connection ” or “ attachment ” of a person to the contracting state concerned. Such an interpretation is consistent with Widrig … and Vogel … and Crown Forest which, as [HMRC counsel] submits, when properly understood in context is authority for the proposition that full or worldwide taxation is a necessary feature of the connecting criterion but is not sufficient of itself. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
14 June 2007 Internal T.I. 2007-0229311I7 F - Capital Dividend Account -- summary under Payment & Receipt
14 June 2007 Internal T.I. 2007-0229311I7 F- Capital Dividend Account-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt making accounting entries does not constitute payment of a dividend After noting that payment of two back-to-back capital dividends (from “Subco” to “Parentco,” and form it to its individual shareholder) had been accomplished only by accounting entries, the Directorate found that this was insufficient to give rise to a capital dividend “received” by Parentco, so that there had been no addition to its capital dividend account. In this regard, it stated: [T]he mere making of the accounting entries … does not in itself constitute the payment of a dividend … by either Subco or Parentco. … [H]owever … a dividend can be paid by a corporation and received by its recipient without any monetary movement, for example, by the issuance of a demand note that is accepted as an absolute payment by the recipient. ...
Conference summary
7 October 2020 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 3, 2020-0851991C6 F - Shares Donation to a tax exempt entity & dividend -- summary under Subsection 129(1.2)
7 October 2020 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 3, 2020-0851991C6 F- Shares Donation to a tax exempt entity & dividend-- summary under Subsection 129(1.2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 129- Subsection 129(1.2) on an excepted gift of 10% of the shares of a CCPC to a public foundation and the shares’ redemption, s. 129(1.2) could deny the CCPC’s dividend refund In order to make a donation to a registered charity and public foundation (the "Donee"), a CCPC wholly-owned by Mr. ... Furthermore, the CRA took a similar approach in … 2016-0628181R3 by adding an opinion that any dividend … paid … on the shares of … the private corporation (Holdco) to the foundation (Foundation), which had previously acquired the shares as a result of the transfer of the shares by the testamentary spousal trust for the spouse of the deceased following the death of the spouse, would be considered not to be a taxable dividend, with the result that subsection 129(1. 2) would apply …. Whether the Purpose Test is satisfied is a question of fact that can only be resolved on the basis of the facts and circumstances …. ...
Decision summary
Revenue & Customs v Burlington Loan Management DAC, [2024] UKUT 152 -- summary under Article 12
Revenue & Customs v Burlington Loan Management DAC, [2024] UKUT 152-- summary under Article 12 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 12 Irishco’s purchasing a UK interest claim from Caymansco at a tax arbitrage price did not have Treaty-reduction as a main purpose BLM was a substantial Irish-resident investment company, which started acquiring proved claims in the administration of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) ("LBIE" – a UK resident) in 2011 and came to own 443 such claims. ... HMRC denied BLM’s refund claim on the basis of Art. 12(5) of that Treaty, which excluded the application of Art. 12 “if it was the main purpose or one of the main purposes of any person concerned with the … assignment … to take advantage of … Article [12].” ... “It was appropriate for the FTT to have had regard to the fact that there were potential purchasers of the SAAD Claim for whom UK WHT would not have been an issue and for whom the UK-Ireland treaty would not have been relevant [e.g., UK purchasers with tax losses] … who were prepared to pay a price higher than 80% of the interest on the SAAD Claim for reasons wholly unconnected to the UK-Ireland treaty” (para. 78). ...
Decision summary
Revenue & Customs v Burlington Loan Management DAC, [2024] UKUT 152 -- summary under Article 7(1)
Revenue & Customs v Burlington Loan Management DAC, [2024] UKUT 152-- summary under Article 7(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Multilateral Instrument- Article 7- Article 7(1) accessing Irish-UK treaty dividend-withholding reduction was not abusive given that not a treaty-shopping or conduit transaction BLM was a substantial Irish-resident investment company, which had been acquiring proved claims in the administration of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) ("LBIE" – a UK resident) since 2011. ... HMRC denied BLM’s refund claim on the basis of Art. 12(5) of that Treaty, which excluded the application of Art. 12 “if it was the main purpose or one of the main purposes of any person concerned with the … assignment … to take advantage of … Article [12].” ... “It was appropriate for the FTT to have had regard to the fact that there were potential purchasers of the SAAD Claim for whom UK WHT would not have been an issue and for whom the UK-Ireland treaty would not have been relevant [e.g., UK purchasers with tax losses] … who were prepared to pay a price higher than 80% of the interest on the SAAD Claim for reasons wholly unconnected to the UK-Ireland treaty” (para. 78). ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
25 January 2018 External T.I. 2017-0709241E5 - Subsections 125(3.2) & 125(5.1) -- summary under Subsection 125(5.1)
25 January 2018 External T.I. 2017-0709241E5- Subsections 125(3.2) & 125(5.1)-- summary under Subsection 125(5.1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 125- Subsection 125(5.1) business limit is ground first based on taxable capital before it can be assigned Does the assignment of the business limit under s. 125(3.2) occur before or after the business limit reduction in s. 125(5.1)? After noting that under s. 125(5.1) “the business limit … is reduced on a straight-line basis if the total of the taxable capital of the CCPC (employed in Canada) and, if applicable, of [associated] corporations … exceeds $10 million … [so that] once the taxable capital … reaches $15 million its business limit would be zero,” CRA stated:. ...
Decision summary
Agence du revenu du Québec v. Structures GB Ltée, 2025 QCCA 134 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
Structures GB Ltée, 2025 QCCA 134-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission corporate reorganization documents could not be rectified to correct for an unforeseen Pt. ... (Canada), so that the rectification order was reversed, the Court stated (at paras. 25, 29-30, 36, TaxInterpretations translation): If the agreement is consistent with what the parties agreed to but simply produces unforeseen tax consequences, due to an error by the tax planners in the design of the tax planning, rectification cannot be granted. … The parties had not planned any specific entitlement [“prestation”] aimed at ensuring that Structures and the holding companies were connected throughout the 31 stages of the corporate reorganization of Structures. … … Mr. Côté, the tax specialist who conceptualized the reorganization, … affirmed that maintaining connectedness was not the object of the transaction, which was to crystallize as much CGD as possible.... ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
30 October 2003 External T.I. 2003-0037465 F - Subsections 40(3.3) & 40(3.4) -- summary under Subsection 40(3.4)
30 October 2003 External T.I. 2003-0037465 F- Subsections 40(3.3) & 40(3.4)-- summary under Subsection 40(3.4) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 40- Subsection 40(3.4) non-application of s. 40(3.4) where taxpayer acquires then immediately disposes of an additional block/ application of formula where it partially dips into existing block A taxpayer described in s. 40(3.3)(a), which on January 1, 200X had held 100 common shares of Pubco for at least three months, acquired an additional 50 shares on June 1, 200X, and on June 2, 200X, disposed of those additional shares to an unaffiliated person, sustaining a capital loss.. ... CCRA indicated that although s. 40(3.4) would apply, under its administrative position, only 1/2 of the taxpayer's loss would be considered to be nil under s. 40(3.4)(a) under the formula: Deemed nil loss = (the lesser of S, P and B) / S x L where S = the number of shares disposed of at that time 100 P = the number of shares acquired during the period described in paragraph 40(3.3)(b) 50 B = the number of shares remaining at the end of that period 50 L = the loss on the disposition otherwise determined And therefore: Deemed nil loss = 50 / 100 x L CCRA indicated that s. 40(3.4) would apply to the entire loss arising under a second variation, under which, on June 1, 200X, the taxpayer disposed of 50 of the 100 Pubco common shares and on June 2, 200X, acquired an additional 50 Pubco common shares of Pubco. ...