Search - 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查

25 November 2012 Roundtable, 2013-0479401C6 F- Employés et Achat Ltée – commentaires panel ARC-- summary under Paragraph 251(1)(c) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 251- Subsection 251(1)- Paragraph 251(1)(c) Buyco that is formed by employer to purchases departing employees’ shares is NAL In order to facilitate the disposition of shares of departing employees who had purchased their shares under an employee share ownership plan (ESOP), Opco forms and injects funds into a new company (Buyco), which uses those funds to purchase the employee’s Opco shares. ... This … is consistent with … 2007-0243171C6, 2002-0166655 and 2004-0103061E5 … Petro-Canada and … RMM …. ...

6 October 2017 APFF Roundtable Q. 1, 2017-0708971C6 F- Inactive Corporations & subs. 162(7) ITA-- summary under Subsection 162(7) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 162- Subsection 162(7) no penalty imposed where failure to file a nil T2 return At the 2016 APFF Conference, CRA indicated that an inactive corporation must file an income tax return, but could file a letter explaining the non-filing, and that a penalty would not be automatically imposed. ... After noting that such filing was required by s. 150(1)(a)(i)(A), CRA stated: … Exida.com … stated that the general penalty in subsection 162(7) was applicable … where a person fails to comply with an obligation imposed on the person … unless another provision of the Income Tax Act provides for a penalty for such default. … However … the CRA [considers] that since this decision is based on a rather narrow interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions, the penalty under subsection 162(7) will generally not be imposed on resident corporations that failed to file their tax returns where they either had no taxable income or had incurred a loss for the year. ...

10 October 2014 APFF Roundtable Q. 15, 2014-0538151C6 F- 2014 APFF Roundtable, Q. 15- Section 143.4 & Reverse Earn-out-- summary under Subsection 143.4(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 143.4- Subsection 143.4(2) reverse earnout obligation of Buyco re Target shares A newly formed corporation ("Newco") purchases the shares of a target corporation ("Target") for consideration that includes an earn-out clause (resulting in a debt which is subsequently forgiven). ... However we can offer the following general comments which nonetheless, in some circumstances, would not apply in a particular situation. … … (a) …[A] reduction in the cost of the shares in the capital stock of Target through the application of subsection 143.4(2) prior to the amalgamation would in general permit the debt to qualify as "excluded obligation" as defined in subsection 80(1), by reason of the application of paragraph (a) of that definition. ...

10 October 2014 APFF Roundtable Q. 15, 2014-0538151C6 F- 2014 APFF Roundtable, Q. 15- Section 143.4 & Reverse Earn-out-- summary under Excluded Obligation Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 80- Subsection 80(1)- Excluded Obligation reverse earnout obligation of Buyco re Target was excluded obligation A newly formed corporation ("Newco") purchases the shares of a target corporation ("Target") for consideration that includes an earn-out clause (resulting in a debt which is subsequently forgiven). ... However we can offer the following general comments which nonetheless, in some circumstances, would not apply in a particular situation. … … (a) …[A] reduction in the cost of the shares in the capital stock of Target through the application of subsection 143.4(2) prior to the amalgamation would in general permit the debt to qualify as "excluded obligation" as defined in subsection 80(1), by reason of the application of paragraph (a) of that definition. Paragraph (d) of the definition of "excluded obligation in general could not apply because the debt was of a capital nature. … (b) In such situations, it appears to us that in general the extinguishing of the debt could generally give rise to a "forgiven amount" given that the debt would not qualify as an "excluded obligation" as per the definition provided in paragraph 80(1).In the situations presented in this question (with ITA subsection 143.4(2) not being applicable), the fact that the shares no longer existed following the amalgamation and that consequently their cost would not be reduced, does not appear relevant to the question of there being a "forgiven amount" as defined in paragraph 80(1). ...

7 October 2020 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 3, 2020-0851991C6 F- Shares Donation to a tax exempt entity & dividend-- summary under Subsection 129(1.2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 129- Subsection 129(1.2) on an excepted gift of 10% of the shares of a CCPC to a public foundation and the shares’ redemption, s. 129(1.2) could deny the CCPC’s dividend refund In order to make a donation to a registered charity and public foundation (the "Donee"), a CCPC wholly-owned by Mr. ... Furthermore, the CRA took a similar approach in … 2016-0628181R3 by adding an opinion that any dividend … paid … on the shares of … the private corporation (Holdco) to the foundation (Foundation), which had previously acquired the shares as a result of the transfer of the shares by the testamentary spousal trust for the spouse of the deceased following the death of the spouse, would be considered not to be a taxable dividend, with the result that subsection 129(1. 2) would apply …. Whether the Purpose Test is satisfied is a question of fact that can only be resolved on the basis of the facts and circumstances …. ...

11 October 2013 Roundtable, 2013-0499671C6 F- Actif d'impôts futurs / Future income tax assets-- summary under Small Business Corporation Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Small Business Corporation future income tax asset is not an asset – tax receivable is, but is an active business asset if it arose from active business Is a future income tax asset an asset used in an active business for the purposes of the definition of qualified small business corporation share in s. 110.6(1) and of small business corporation in s. 248(1)? ... The tax receivable may be an asset used in the active carrying on of a business for [such] purposes …. For example … tax receivable due to the carryback of a loss from an active business is an asset used primarily in the business that the corporation is actively carrying on for purposes of both definitions. … The same interpretation applies to deferred tax assets. ...

10 October 2014 APFF Roundtable Q. 6, 2014-0538251C6 F- 2014 APFF Roundtable, Q. 6- Application of subsection 75(2) after Sommerer-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission no comment on Pallen Trust CRA declined to comment on Pallen Trust, 2014 BCSC 305, as it had been appealed to the British Columbia Court of Appeal. ...

24 November 2013 CTF Roundtable, 2013-0508151C6- Upstream Loans-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt repayment by set-off A loan or indebtedness will be considered to have been repaid by a debtor by way of set-off against a receivable of the debtor "if the set-off represents a legal discharge of the loan or indebtedness. ...

10 June 2011 Roundtable, 2011-0404621C6 F- Rectification order in Québec-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission CRA awaiting resolution of AES and Riopel cases CRA noted that as the ARQ had sought leave to appeal the AES decision to the Supreme Court and the period for seeking leave in Riopel had not yet expired, it would prefer to refrain from commenting on those decisions effect on CRA’s views on rectification. ...

5 January 1996 CTF Roundtable Q. 31, 9523976- GROSS-UP PAYMENTS-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt A gross-up on a debt obligation owing to a Canadian lender will be included in the Canadian lender's income under s. 9 or s. 12(1)(c) even "where the gross-up is paid or credited to the government of a foreign country on the Canadian lender's behalf since the Canadian lender would have constructively received the gross-up". ...