Income Tax Severed Letters - 2023-01-25

Ruling

2023 Ruling 2022-0931631R3 - Loss consolidation arrangement

Unedited CRA Tags
15(1), 20(1)(c), 20(3), 55(2), 56(2), 112(1), (2.1), (2.2), (2.3) and (2.4), 187.2, 191.1(1), 245(2), 246(1).

Principal Issues: Whether Lossco can apply existing non-capital losses against interest income received on a loan made to Profitco under a loss consolidation arrangement and whether Profitco can deduct the interest payments.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The proposed transactions conform to our requirements for these types of loss consolidation rulings on the basis that the entities involved are related and affiliated and the proposed transactions would be legally effective and commercially plausible.

2022 Ruling 2020-0858451R3 F - Trust to trust transfer

Unedited CRA Tags
108(1)(g) "trust", 248(1), 248(3), 248(25.1).
deemed disposition under s. 104(4) avoided through irrevocable vesting of interests in successor trust
no disposition on transfer of assets of Trust 1 to Trust 2 with essentially the same terms other than a clause facilitating irrevocable-vesting designations

Principales Questions: 1) Whether a particular trust to trust transfer will meet the requirements of paragraph (f) of the definition of "disposition" in subsection 248(1)? 2) Whether the requirements of paragraph (g) of the definition of "trust" in subsection 108(1) will be met in a particular situation?

Position Adoptée: 1) Yes. 2) Yes.

Raisons: 1) The new trust is identical to the original trust, except that the new trust permits indefeasible vesting. In this particular situation, the beneficiaries' respective rights are not affected by the trust to trust transfer and hence, the trust to trust transfer does not result in a change in beneficial ownership. 2) Prior positions.

Conference

7 October 2022 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 1, 2022-0936241C6 F - T1135 and situs of cryptocurrencies

Unedited CRA Tags
233.3

Principal Issues: Whether there is an update on the study related to the CRA analysing the situs of cryptocurrencies for Canadian reporting purposes.

Position: No position adopted yet.

Reasons: Issue currently under active review by the CRA.

7 October 2022 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 2, 2022-0936281C6 F - police d'assurance-vie & avantage

Unedited CRA Tags
246(1), 246(2), 12(1)x), 18(1)b)
taxable benefit where 2 Holdcos pay premiums on life insurance policies of which their jointly-owned sub is beneficiary unless s. 246(2) applies
premiums paid by parent on a sub’s life insurance policies are non-deductible even if reimbursed on income account
premiums paid by Holdcos on policies of which their jointly-owned company (Opco) is the beneficiary are non-deductible capital expenditures even if reimbursed by the Opcos

Principales Questions: La situation décrite est celle où deux Gesco souscrivent à une assurance-vie sur la vie de leur actionnaire respectif. Opco, une société détenue par les Gesco, est la bénéficiaire des polices d'assurance. Les Gesco paient les primes d’assurance. a) Est-ce que le paragraphe 246(1) s’appliquerait dans ce cas compte tenu du lien de dépendance entre les Gesco et Opco? b) La réponse serait-elle différente s'il n'y avait pas de lien de dépendance? c) Si Opco remboursait les primes aux Gesco, est-ce que les paiements reçus par les Gesco seraient imposables en vertu de l’article 9 ou de l’alinéa 12(1)x)? d) Est-ce que la réponse à la question c) serait différente si la désignation de bénéficiaire était révocable? e) Si le remboursement des primes était imposable pour les Gesco, auraient-elles le droit de déduire une partie des primes d’assurance-vie payées? / The situation described is one in which two Holdcos subscribe to a life-insurance policy on the life of their respective shareholder. Opco, a corporation held by the Holdcos, is the beneficiary of the policies. The Holdcos pay the insurance premiums. a) Would subsection 246(1) apply in this case due to the non arm's length relationship between the Holdcos and Opco? b) Would the answer be different if it was an arm's length relationship? c) If Opco refunded the insurance premiums paid by the Holdcos, would the amounts received by the Holdcos be taxable under section 9 or paragraph 12(1)(x)? d) Would the answer to question c) be different if the beneficiary designation was revocable? e) If the amount refunded were taxable to the Holdcos, would they be able to deduct the premiums paid?

Position Adoptée: a) Le paragraphe 246(1) pourrait s'appliquer, sous réserve d’un examen de l’ensemble des faits pertinents. b), c) et d) Question de fait. e) Non. / a) Subsection 246(1) could apply, subject to a review of all the relevant facts. b), c) and d) Question of fact. e) No.

Raisons: a) La position de l’ARC dans les documents 2009-0347291C6, 2009-0329911C6 et 2010-0359421C6 est toujours valide. Cependant, il faut examiner l’ensemble des faits d’une situation donnée pour déterminer si toutes les conditions d'application du paragraphe 246(1) sont satisfaites. b) Il faut examiner tous les faits pour déterminer si toutes les conditions d'application du paragraphe 246(2) sont satisfaites. c) et d) Faits insuffisants. e) En général, les primes d'assurance-vie ne sont pas déductibles en raison de l'alinéa 18(1)b). / a) CRA's view in documents 2009-0347291C6, 2009-0329911C6 et 2010-0359421C6 is still valid. b) We would have to review all the facts in order to determine if all the conditions in subsection 246(2) are satisfied. c) and d) Insufficient facts. e) In general, life-insurance premium are not deductible as a result of paragraph 18(1)(b).

7 October 2022 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 3, 2022-0943261C6 F - Average Exchange Rate

Unedited CRA Tags
261(1); 261(2)
circumscribed acceptance of using average exchange rates
use of average exchange rates for capital property dispositions not generally accommodated
use of average exchange rate under s. 39(1.1) is permitted

Principal Issues: When the use of an average rate would be acceptable and what would constitute an acceptable averaging period?

Position: Fundamental to the CRA’s acceptance of an average rate is whether it is reasonable to conclude that its use will still result in a reliable approximation of what a taxpayer’s income would have been using daily exchange rates.

Reasons: The appropriate and proper application of the CRA’s policy on the use of average exchange rates should be tax neutral and is not intended to provide any tax advantage.

7 October 2022 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 4, 2022-0940941C6 - Stop-loss Rules

Unedited CRA Tags
40(2)g)(i), 53(1)f), 54, 251.1(1), 40(3.3), 40(3.4)
superficial loss allocated on a pooled basis to shares held at the end of the 61-day period by affiliated persons
suspended loss rules engaged by shareholder, and shareholder’s RRSP acquiring and then holding identical shares during the 61-day period
formula for prorating superficial loss is inapplicable where the number of shares held by affiliated persons has increased at the end of the 61-day period

Principales Questions: 1. In the hypothetical scenario 1 described, how should the ACB of a substituted property be adjusted? 2. In the hypothetical scenarios 2 and 3 described, when would the transferor be allowed to claim the capital loss previously denied under paragraph 40(3.4)(a)? 3. Clarification as to the meaning of element B in the formula SL = (Least of S, P and B)/S x L.

Position Adoptée: 1. In the hypothetical scenario 1 described, the superficial loss should be determined in accordance with paragraph 12 of the Interpretation bulletin IT-456R, namely as if all the parties were one person and subsequently prorated on the basis of actual substituted property held by a person at the end of the period. 2. At the time that is immediately before the earliest of the events described in subparagraphs 40(3.4)(b)(i) to (v). 3. In general, the number of shares remaining at the end of the period for the purpose of element B of the formula means all shares that are identical, including shares acquired prior to that period.

Raisons: Wording of the Act and previous positions.

7 October 2022 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 5, 2022-0936301C6 F - Guarantee fee

Unedited CRA Tags
9(1), 15(1), 18(9), 20(1)(e), 20(1)(e.1), 125(7), 129(4), 248(1).
one-time fee to subsidiary for mortgaging its property as security for a bank loan to the shareholder would not qualify under s. 20(1)(e.1)
one-time fee to subsidiary for mortgaging its property as security for a bank loan to the shareholder could qualify under s. 20(1)(e)
guarantee or pledge fee is from a service and, therefore, is from an undertaking of any kind whatever
Words and Phrases
undertaking carry on service
no shareholder benefit where corporation receives a reasonable pledge (or “guarantee”) fee from its shareholder

Principales Questions: 1. Whether the guarantee fee is deductible in computing the income of the shareholder in the situation described in the question. 2. In a given situation, whether a guarantee fee received by a corporation from a shareholder is an income from a property or a business income. 3. Whether subsection 15(1) is applicable in the situation described in the question.

Position Adoptée: 1. Deduction under paragraph 20(1)(e) or 20(1)(e.1) (but also subject to the possible application of subsection 18(9)). 2. It is a question of fact but generally would be considered as a business income. 3. Question of fact, but in general no for the granting of the guarantee (in and by itself).

Raisons: 1. Wording of paragraph 20(1)(e) or 20(1)(e.1) and previous positions. 2. Previous positions. 3. Previous positions.

7 October 2022 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 6, 2022-0936311C6 F - Illness insurance policy used as collateral

Unedited CRA Tags
18(1)(b), 20(1)(e.1)
critical illness insurance policy premiums on policy assigned to lender cannot be deducted under s. 20(1)(e.1)

Principal Issues: Whether premiums paid by a corporation for a critical illness insurance policy used as collateral for a loan for the purpose of earning income from business or property are deductible.

Position: No.

Reasons: According to the law and previous positions.

7 October 2022 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 7, 2022-0938221C6 F - Régime d'accession à la propriété (RAP) - rembours

Unedited CRA Tags
146.01(1) "montant admissible principal", 146.01(1) "solde RAP", 146.01(3).
an HBP balance is not reduced at the beginning of the year of a contribution repayment by the repayment amount until the repayment is made
HBP balance not reduced until s. 146.01(3) repayment is made and prescribed form filed

Principales Questions: Le solde RAP d’un particulier sera-t-il nul au début de l’année civile, tel que le requiert l’alinéa i) de la définition de « montant admissible principal » au paragraphe 146.01(1), si le particulier rembourse son solde RAP dans les 60 premiers jours de l'année où il veut effectuer un nouveau retrait de son REER dans le cadre du RAP? – Whether the HBP balance of an individual will be nil at the beginning of the calendar year, as required by paragraph (i) of the definition of “regular eligible amount” in subsection 146.01(1), if the individual repays his HBP balance within the first 60 days of the year in which he wants to make a new withdrawal from his RRSP under the HBP?

Position Adoptée: Possiblement. Le solde RAP du particulier sera nul tel que requis par l’alinéa i) de la définition de « montant admissible principal » une fois que le particulier aura versé des montants suffisants à un REER, au plus tard dans les 60 premiers jours de l’année, et indiqué le total des montants ainsi versés comme remboursement dans le cadre du RAP sur le formulaire prescrit joint à sa déclaration de revenu pour l’année d’imposition précédente.– Possibly. The individual’s HBP balance will be NIL as required by paragraph (i) of the definition of “regular eligible amount” only after the individual has contributed sufficient amounts to his RRSP, no later than within the first 60 days of the year, and designated such amounts as HBP repayment in prescribed form filed with his return for the preceding taxation year.

Raisons: Conformément au paragraphe 146.01(3) et à la définition de "solde RAP" au paragraphe 146.01(1). - Application of subsection 146.01(3) and the definition of "HBP balance" in section 146.01(1).

7 October 2022 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 8, 2022-0940961C6 F - RRIF - successive deaths

Unedited CRA Tags
146.3 "designated benefit"
spouse of a deceased RRIF annuitant must be still alive at the time of a payment out of the RRIF in order for the designated benefit rules to apply
s. 146.3(6.2) reduction unavailable where surviving spouse dies before payment made out of deceased's RRIF

Principales Questions: Whether an amount paid out of a RRIF to the estate of a surviving spouse who died shortly after the death of the deceased annuitant can qualify as a designated benefit?

Position Adoptée: No.

Raisons: Wording of the definition of “designated benefit” in subsection 146.3(1). The amount has to be paid to the surviving spouse while the spouse is alive or, if applicable, the spouse has to be alive at the time the joint election is made. The spouse's estate cannot receive or be deemed to have received a designated benefit.

7 October 2022 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 9, 2022-0940951C6 F - FRB créée par testament après 2015

Unedited CRA Tags
118.1(5), 118.1(5.1)
a gift by will of a capital interest in a charitable remainder trust can be claimed only by the GRE, not the deceased
gift of capital interest in charitable remainder trust is considered to be made by GRE when such interest vests in the charity

Principales Questions: a) Est-ce qu’un particulier décédé après 2015 peut réclamer le crédit d’impôt pour dons pour le don à un donataire reconnu d'une participation au capital dans une fiducie résiduaire de bienfaisance (FRB) créée par testament? b) Est-ce que la participation au capital de la FRB a été acquise par la SAITP au moment et par suite du décès du particulier? c) À quel moment la SAITP effectue-t-elle le don? / a) Whether an individual who died after 2015 may claim the tax credit for gifts with respect to the gift to a qualified donee of a capital interest in a charitable remainder trust (CRT) created by will? b) Whether the capital interest in the CRT was acquired by the GRE on and as a consequence of the death of the individual? c) When does the GRE make the gift?

Position Adoptée: a) et b) Non. c) Lorsque la FRB est créée et que la participation au capital de la FRB a été dévolue au donataire reconnu, ce qui implique que toutes les conditions énumérées au numéro 2 du IT-226R soient satisfaites. / a) and b) No. c) When the CRT is created and the capital interest in the CRT has vested in the qualified donee, which means that all the conditions in paragraph 2 of IT-226R have to be met.

Raisons: a) et b) L'objet du don est la participation au capital dans la FRB et la participation n’a pas été acquise par la SAITP au moment du décès du particulier et par suite de ce décès tel qu’exigé à l’alinéa 118.1(5.1)b). La participation n’est pas non plus un bien substitué à un tel bien. c) Numéros 2 et 4 du IT-226R. / a) and b) The subject of the gift is the equitable interest in the CRB and has not been acquired by the GRE on and as a consequence of the death of the deceased taxpayer as required under paragraph 118.1(5.1)(b). Nor is the interest a property substituted for such property. c)

7 October 2022 APFF Financial Strategies and Instruments Roundtable Q. 10, 2022-0938301C6 F - Rebate on purchase of GIC

Unedited CRA Tags
12(1)(x), 53(2.1), 53(2)
broker’s waiver of commission could be an inducement payment
broker-waived commission included in cost of GIC

Principal Issues: What is the tax treatment for an investor of a rebate received by the investor from the broker on the purchase of a GIC.

Position: General comments provided.

Reasons: According to the law and previous positions.