News of Note

CRA indicates the that granting of power of attorney over shares would not change the shares’ ownership for purposes of the s. 120.4 – excluded share definition

An adult child, who was over 24 and a “specified individual,” received a distribution of 10% of the common shares of a CCPC from a family trust, of which his father (a “source individual”) was one of the two trustees, then he granted his father a power of attorney (POA) regarding those common shares, pursuant to which his father could exercise all rights attached to those shares except as expressly excepted. CRA stated:

Although Father may exercise the rights attached to the shares, it is our understanding that the POA would not involve a transfer of the legal or beneficial ownership of such shares to Father.

Accordingly, CRA concluded that the grant of the POA would not detract from the child satisfying the 10% of votes and value test under para. (b) of the excluded share definition in the TOSI provisions.

Neal Armstrong. Summary of 12 March 2025 External T.I. 2025-1053231E5 under s. 120.4(1) – excluded share – (b).

CRA provides a list of the particulars that should be recorded by a supplier of contact lenses or eyeglasses (if it does not have the prescription)

CRA states that the simplest way for a supplier to demonstrate that its supply of contact lenses or eyeglasses was made to a consumer pursuant to a valid prescription or assessment record, as required by ETA s. VI-II-9 (see also Contact Lens King) in order for there to be zero-rating, is to retain a copy of those documents. Alternatively, the supplier could obtain and retain details in order to make that demonstration. After receiving representations regarding its previous listing of required details, CRA has now provided a revised list (pared down from the previous one), namely:

  • the issue date of the prescription or assessment record;
  • the name of the issuing eye care professional; and
  • the details of the prescription or assessment record, such as the sphere, cylinder, axis, base curve, or pupillary distance values.

Neal Armstrong. Summary of Excise and GST/HST News – No. 119, April 2025 under ETA s. VI-II-9.

It is proposed that Whitecap Resources acquire all the shares of Veren on a s. 85.1 exchange

It is proposed that, under an Alberta Plan of Arrangement, all of the outstanding shares of Veren will be exchanged, generally on a s. 85.1 rollover basis, for shares of Whitecap Resources on the basis of 1.05 Whitecap shares for each Veren share. The combined company is expected to have an enterprise value of approximately $15 billion, and to be initially owned as to approximately 52% by the former Veren shareholders.

Neal Armstrong. Summary of 28 March 2025 joint Management Information Circular of Whitecap Resources Inc. and Veren Inc. under Mergers & Acquisitions – Mergers – Share for Share.

CRA indicates that the "duties … of a temporary nature" condition in s. 6(6)(a)(i) is tested on a site-by-site basis

After being asked inter alia whether the "duties … of a temporary nature" condition in s. 6(6)(a)(i) is satisfied where an employee is assigned successively to two projects in the same region or city, CRA indicated “that the place where an employee performs work of a temporary nature (i.e., a special work site) is a particular place of work and not a general geographical area such as a city.” Thus, in the above examples, the second site in the same region or city would be tested separately as to whether the duties to be performed at that special work site were "of a temporary nature."

Neal Armstrong. Summary of 4 January 2022 External T.I. 2016-0644861E5 F under s. 6(6)(a)(i).

CRA indicates that settling QSBCS shares on a personal trust with related beneficiaries before a sale of those shares 6 months later would not cause QSBCS status to be lost

An individual transferred all his long-term holding of the shares of a corporation which otherwise would have qualified as qualified small business corporation shares (QSBCS) to a personal trust whose only beneficiaries were his two children. Six months after that, the trust disposed of the shares to an unrelated third party.

CRA indicated that the mere fact that the trust had not been in existence for 24 months at the time of such disposition would not prevent the shares from qualifying as QSBCS. Furthermore, in order for the 24-month holding period requirement set out in para. (b) of the QSBCS definition to be met, the trust and the person from whom it acquired the shares (the individual) needed to be related under s. 110.6(14)(c)(ii) (which appeared to be the case since, at the time of the disposition, all of the beneficiaries of the trust were related to the individual).

Neal Armstrong. Summary of 28 March 2025 External T.I. 2016-0662951E5 F under s. 110.6(1) – QSBCS – (b).

CRA has issued a new Folio on the s. 80.4 rules

CRA has issued a new Folio on the rules for imputing interest on shareholder loans, contained principally in s. 80.4. Points made by it include:

  • CRA lists factors that it considers relevant to determining whether a shareholder received a loan qua shareholder or qua employee (relevant inter alia to whether the imputed benefit is from employment).
  • Once a loan becomes subject to the s. 80.4 rules, it remains subject to those provisions for all taxation years as long as any part of it remains unpaid even if, for example, the taxpayer ceases to be a shareholder
  • Where a borrower did not include a loan in income because it was expected that the s. 15(2.6) exception would apply, and an interest benefit was included under s. 80.4(2) in the borrower's tax return for the year in which the loan was received, then if the loan in fact is not repaid within the s. 15(2.6) time period, the borrower should amend the tax return for that year to remove the deemed interest benefit amount from income and to include the loan amount in income.
  • Where s. 80.4(2) results in a deemed interest benefit to a non-resident borrower, s. 80.5 applies to deem the amount of the benefit to be interest payable in respect of the year pursuant to a legal obligation to pay interest on the borrowed money for purposes of s. 20(1)(c). Accordingly, a deduction under s. 20(1)(c) may be claimed where the proceeds of the loan were used by the non-resident to earn income in Canada that is taxable under Part I.

Neal Armstrong. Summaries of Income Tax Folio S3-F1-C2 Deemed Interest Benefit on Shareholder Loans and Debts, April 10, 2025 under s. 80.4(2). s. 80.4(3)(a), s. 80.4(3)(b), s. 80.4(3)(c). s. 80.4(1) and s. 80.5.

Income Tax Severed Letters 23 April 2025

This morning's release of four severed letters from the Income Tax Rulings Directorate is now available for your viewing.

CRA issues a new Folio on the shareholder loan rules

CRA has issued a new Folio on the shareholder loan rules in s. 15(2) et seq. A few of the points covered include:

  • Although a loan made for the purpose of refinancing an existing indebtedness that was previously incurred by an employee to acquire a dwelling will generally not meet the requirement under s. 15(2.4)(b) of having been made to enable or assist the acquisition of the dwelling, there is an exception for where the lender made a commitment to an individual on or before the individual's acquisition of the dwelling to provide permanent financing and in the interim, the individual used interim financing, such as construction financing, to construct or otherwise acquire the building.
  • Regarding the requirement for bona fide repayment arrangements in s. 15(2.4)(f), at the time the loan is made, the arrangements for repayment must be such that it is possible to determine, with some certainty, the period within which the loan will be repaid.
  • However, when trade debts are not paid according to the creditor's normal payment terms but they are settled within 12 months of being incurred, bona fide arrangements are considered to have been made at the time the debt arose for purposes of s. 15(2.3).
  • CRA has carried forward most or all of its positions regarding the s. 15(2.6) rule including regarding when there is series of loans or other transactions and repayments, for instance that:
    • repayments are applied on a first-in, first-out basis (i.e., to the oldest loan first) when a shareholder has more than one loan outstanding at the time of repayment, unless the facts clearly indicate otherwise;
    • repayments can be made by applying dividend, salary, or bonus payments against an outstanding loan; and
    • a repayment may be considered to have been made as part of a series of loans or other transactions and repayments where the proceeds of a new loan are used to repay an existing shareholder loan.
  • CRA has also carried forward its generous policies on the deferred timing for the recognition of a Part XIII remittance obligation on a benefit subject to such tax under s. 214(3)(a).
  • Furthermore, if a PLOI election is available in respect of a loan but has not yet been filed, the CRA will assess Part XIII withholding tax only after the time period described in s. 15(2.6) has elapsed.
  • In a situation where a loan amount that is owed by a non-resident borrower has been assigned by the original lender to a new lender and the borrower subsequently repays the loan to the new lender, the borrower may still be entitled to a refund of the Part XIII tax previously assessed.

Neal Armstrong. Summaries of Income Tax Folio S3-F1-C1, Shareholder Loans and Debts, April 10, 2025 under s. 15(2), s. 15(2.17), s. 15(2.3), s. 15(2.4)(b), s. 15(2.4)(c), s. 15(2.4)(a), s. 15(2.4)(f), s. 15(2.4)(e), s. 15(2.6), s. 20(1)(j) and s. 214(3)(a).

Additional difficulties can arise in making a VDP disclosure on behalf of a deceased taxpayer

Additional challenges often arise where a voluntary disclosure is made by an executor in respect of a deceased taxpayer:

  • In light of the requirement to make payment of the unpaid taxes with submission of the disclosure package, the estate funds might be in an offshore account, payments from which would trigger international reporting to CRA (thereby alerting it prematurely, i.e., before submission of the package).
  • Making a voluntary disclosure generally will result in the estate owing more tax, which could increase potential liability to the executor under s. 159 or 160.
  • The executor may often lack information regarding the extent of the non-disclosure by the deceased, for example, how long an offshore account was held or how much income was generated therefrom, thereby creating a risk that CRA may not consider that its requirement for reasonable efforts to estimate income for the voluntary disclosure has been satisfied.
  • The executor may not be aware of the reasons why the deceased had not fully complied with the applicable tax obligations and, therefore, may not be in a position to demonstrate that the disclosure should be accepted under the more favourable general program.
  • IC00-1R6 states that enforcement action taken against a taxpayer will also invalidate the voluntariness of disclosure by related taxpayers, including those related through trust-specific relationships. Accordingly, in a situation where voluntary disclosure by an estate is also required, for example, where an undisclosed offshore account was not identified until a number of years after the death, a non-compliance letter issued by CRA to the estate (or the deceased) will invalidate the pending voluntary disclosure by the deceased (or the estate).

Neal Armstrong. Summary of Dean Blachford and Ella Sui, “Filing a Voluntary Disclosure for a Deceased Taxpayer,” Tax for the Owner-Manager, Vol. 25, No. 2, April 2025, p. 14 under s. 220(3.1).

We have translated 7 more CRA interpretations

We have translated a CRA interpretation released last week and a further 6 CRA interpretations released in September of 2000. Their descriptors and links appear below.

These are additions to our set of 3,174 full-text translations of French-language Technical Interpretation and Roundtable items (plus some ruling letters) of the Income Tax Rulings Directorate, which covers all of the last 24 ½ years of releases of such items by the Directorate. These translations are subject to our paywall (applicable after the 5th of each month).

Bundle Date Translated severed letter Summaries under Summary descriptor
2025-04-16 4 March 2025 External T.I. 2024-1009691E5 F - Bump and Qualifying Exchange Income Tax Act - Section 88 - Subsection 88(1) - Paragraph 88(1)(c) a s. 132.2 exchange of MFC shares for MFT units precluded a s. 88(1)(d) bump of the MFT units
2000-09-15 7 September 2000 External T.I. 2000-0015905 F - allocation pour repas Income Tax Act - Section 6 - Subsection 6(1) - Paragraph 6(1)(b) - Subparagraph 6(1)(b)(vii) allowance is reasonable if it is determined on the basis of an estimate of the average costs incurred by employees on a regular basis
7 September 2000 External T.I. 2000-0017015 F - CALCUL DE LA SURTAXE Income Tax Act - Section 180.1 - Subsection 180.1(2) surtax computed on the higher of the Division E and E.1 amounts, both computed before deduction of the foreign tax credit and overseas employment tax credit
7 September 2000 External T.I. 2000-0018585 F - FRAIS DE STAGE COOPERATIF Income Tax Act - Section 118.5 - Subsection 118.5(1) - Paragraph 118.5(1)(a) co-op placement fees were not tuition
8 September 2000 External T.I. 2000-0023475 F - INDIEN EMPLOYE MIN AFFAIRS INDIENNES Other Legislation/Constitution - Federal - Indian Act - Section 87 earnings of a status Indian employed off-reserve by the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs were not exempted
13 September 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0027557 F - REER AU PROFIT DU CONJOINT Income Tax Act - Section 146 - Subsection 146(1) - Spousal or Common-Law Partner Plan - Paragraph (a) - Subparagraph (a)(ii) no extension of the rule to a transfer from spousal plan via an RPP to the taxpayer’s RRSP, but GAAR might apply
31 August 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0038757 F - ALLOCATIONS POUR FRAIS DE DEMENAGEMENT Income Tax Act - Section 6 - Subsection 6(1) - Paragraph 6(1)(b) first $650 of formula moving allowance (e.g., 2 weeks’ salary) was to be excluded from employment income