Search - отримати ешмек шешу

Filter by Type:

Results 471 - 480 of 79432 for отримати ешмек шешу
Decision summary

Agence du revenu du Québec v. Structures GB Ltée, 2025 QCCA 134 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Structures GB Ltée, 2025 QCCA 134-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission corporate reorganization documents could not be rectified to correct for an unforeseen Pt. ... (Canada), so that the rectification order was reversed, the Court stated (at paras. 25, 29-30, 36, TaxInterpretations translation): If the agreement is consistent with what the parties agreed to but simply produces unforeseen tax consequences, due to an error by the tax planners in the design of the tax planning, rectification cannot be granted. The parties had not planned any specific entitlement [“prestation”] aimed at ensuring that Structures and the holding companies were connected throughout the 31 stages of the corporate reorganization of Structures. Mr. Côté, the tax specialist who conceptualized the reorganization, affirmed that maintaining connectedness was not the object of the transaction, which was to crystallize as much CGD as possible.... ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

25 January 2018 External T.I. 2017-0709241E5 - Subsections 125(3.2) & 125(5.1) -- summary under Subsection 125(5.1)

25 January 2018 External T.I. 2017-0709241E5- Subsections 125(3.2) & 125(5.1)-- summary under Subsection 125(5.1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 125- Subsection 125(5.1) business limit is ground first based on taxable capital before it can be assigned Does the assignment of the business limit under s. 125(3.2) occur before or after the business limit reduction in s. 125(5.1)? After noting that under s. 125(5.1) “the business limit is reduced on a straight-line basis if the total of the taxable capital of the CCPC (employed in Canada) and, if applicable, of [associated] corporations exceeds $10 million [so that] once the taxable capital reaches $15 million its business limit would be zero,” CRA stated:. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

30 October 2003 External T.I. 2003-0037465 F - Subsections 40(3.3) & 40(3.4) -- summary under Subsection 40(3.4)

30 October 2003 External T.I. 2003-0037465 F- Subsections 40(3.3) & 40(3.4)-- summary under Subsection 40(3.4) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 40- Subsection 40(3.4) non-application of s. 40(3.4) where taxpayer acquires then immediately disposes of an additional block/ application of formula where it partially dips into existing block A taxpayer described in s. 40(3.3)(a), which on January 1, 200X had held 100 common shares of Pubco for at least three months, acquired an additional 50 shares on June 1, 200X, and on June 2, 200X, disposed of those additional shares to an unaffiliated person, sustaining a capital loss.. ... CCRA indicated that although s. 40(3.4) would apply, under its administrative position, only 1/2 of the taxpayer's loss would be considered to be nil under s. 40(3.4)(a) under the formula: Deemed nil loss = (the lesser of S, P and B) / S x L where S = the number of shares disposed of at that time 100 P = the number of shares acquired during the period described in paragraph 40(3.3)(b) 50 B = the number of shares remaining at the end of that period 50 L = the loss on the disposition otherwise determined And therefore: Deemed nil loss = 50 / 100 x L CCRA indicated that s. 40(3.4) would apply to the entire loss arising under a second variation, under which, on June 1, 200X, the taxpayer disposed of 50 of the 100 Pubco common shares and on June 2, 200X, acquired an additional 50 Pubco common shares of Pubco. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

17 February 2017 External T.I. 2016-0662341E5 - Airline passes – retired and current employees -- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(a)

17 February 2017 External T.I. 2016-0662341E5- Airline passes retired and current employees-- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(a) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 6- Subsection 6(1)- Paragraph 6(1)(a) use of space-confirmed, but not standby, passes by airline employees is taxable Will S2-F3-C2 be revised to reflect the administrative policies in IT-470R, paras. 42, 44 respecting standby airline passes provided to current airline employees (“current employees”) and standby and space-confirmed airline passes provided to retired airline employees (“retired employees”)? ... …[S]tandby and space-confirmed airline passes used by retired employees are not taxed. S2-F3-C2 provide[s] CRA’s interpretive positions, not administrative policies. The CRA webpage, Benefits and allowances, will be updated to include these administrative policies. ...
News of Note post
19 February 2018- 9:19pm RCF IV Federal Court of Australia finds that gains of U.S. limited partners from sales of an Australian resource company were not Treaty exempt but were not TCP-type gains Email this Content Two Caymans investment LPs (“RCF IV” and RCF V”) whose limited partners were mostly U.S. residents, realized gains from the disposal of shares of significant shareholdings in a TSX-listed Australian corporation (Talison Lithium) which, through a grandchild corporation, held mining leases in Australia and carried out an operation there of mining lithium ores and processing them. ... Summaries of Resource Capital Fund IV LP v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCA 41 under Treaties Income Tax Conventions Art. 3, Art. 13, s. 248(1) taxable Canadian property (d), s. 115(1)(a)(ii), s. 9 capital gain. v. profit shares, General Concepts stare decisis, s. 152(1). ...
13 December 2013- 10:44am Angle Energy Bellatrix merger contemplates unilateral s. 85 elections Email this Content Angle Energy shareholders have sold their share to Bellatrix for cash or Bellatrix shares (but with the overall cash/share split fixed at 22%/78%), followed by an amalgamation of Bellatrix, Angle and an Angle subsidiary (ARI).  ... Summary of Joint Circular of Angle Energy and Bellatrix Exploration under Mergers & Acquisitions Mergers Shares for Shares or Cash. ...
Decision summary

Cussens & Ors v Brosnan, ECLI:EU:C:2017:881:Case C-251/16, [2017] BVC 61 -- summary under Subsection 274(4)

The Court stated (at paras 53, 60- 61): …[T]he case-law stemming from the judgment in Halifax does not require it to be established that the accrual of a tax advantage is the only objective of the transactions at issue. In order to determine the substance and real significance of the leases at issue in the main proceedings, the referring court may, in particular, take account of the purely artificial nature of those transactions and the links of a legal, economic and/or personal nature between the operators at issue …. Such aspects are capable of demonstrating that the accrual of a tax advantage constitutes the essential aim pursued, notwithstanding the possible existence, in addition, of economic objectives …. …[T]he leases had no commercial reality and were entered into with the aim of reducing the VAT liability on the sales of immovable property which they envisaged carrying out subsequently. ...
Conference summary

6 October 2017 APFF Roundtable Q. 1, 2017-0708971C6 F - Inactive Corporations & subs. 162(7) ITA -- summary under Subsection 162(7)

6 October 2017 APFF Roundtable Q. 1, 2017-0708971C6 F- Inactive Corporations & subs. 162(7) ITA-- summary under Subsection 162(7) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 162- Subsection 162(7) no penalty imposed where failure to file a nil T2 return At the 2016 APFF Conference, CRA indicated that an inactive corporation must file an income tax return, but could file a letter explaining the non-filing, and that a penalty would not be automatically imposed. ... After noting that such filing was required by s. 150(1)(a)(i)(A), CRA stated: Exida.com stated that the general penalty in subsection 162(7) was applicable where a person fails to comply with an obligation imposed on the person unless another provision of the Income Tax Act provides for a penalty for such default. However the CRA [considers] that since this decision is based on a rather narrow interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions, the penalty under subsection 162(7) will generally not be imposed on resident corporations that failed to file their tax returns where they either had no taxable income or had incurred a loss for the year. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

29 September 2020 External T.I. 2018-0757501E5 F - Crédit pour intérêts sur les prêts étudiants -- summary under Payment & Receipt

29 September 2020 External T.I. 2018-0757501E5 F- Crédit pour intérêts sur les prêts étudiants-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt capitalization of interest on a novation under Quebec law would constitute its payment A Quebec post-secondary student loan program provided for an initial 12-month “full exemption period” (in which the Quebec government paid the interest charged on the loan by the lender) and a subsequent six-month “partial exemption period” (during which the student borrower was required to pay interest on the loan balance). ... In addressing whether such capitalized interest qualified as being “paid” under a “loan made” under the Quebec financial assistance program so as to generate a credit under s. 118.62, CRA stated: By virtue of the Civil Code of Quebec, there can be payment where there is a handing over of money [(“tradition d’argent”)] between the debtor and the creditor or where there is novation by change of debt. The mere addition of accrued interest to the principal amount of an original debt is generally not sufficient in itself to constitute a payment of such interest. If the addition of interest to the principal qualifies as a novation the amount of interest will be considered paid when the novation occurs and will be eligible for the credit by virtue of section 118.62, if all the conditions set out in that section are otherwise satisfied. ...
Decision summary

Haworth & Ors v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs, [2025] EWCA Civ 822 -- summary under Article 4

Haworth & Ors v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs, [2025] EWCA Civ 822-- summary under Article 4 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 4 the place of effective management of trusts for treaty tie-breaker purposes was in the UK even though their CMC might be in Mauritius The UK-resident taxpayers sought to avoid capital gains tax respecting the disposal of shares by family trusts of which they were the settlors by relying on a "Round the World" tax plan. ... If the trustees were appointed because it was appreciated that fulfilment of their responsibilities would cause them to take the decisions, the POEM of the trust might not be in the jurisdiction from which the trustees come. [Here] the role of the trustees in Mauritius was effectively pre-determined. [T]he settlors, albeit with the advice and assistance of advisers, decided to adopt "an overall single plan" and, to that end, exercised their powers to appoint the Mauritius Trustees for a limited period "in the confident expectation that they would implement the plan". ...

Pages