Principal Issues: Whether the transfers by Subco 2 of all of its FA 1 Shares, and by Subco 3 of all of its FA 2 Shares, to Can Holdco, as described below, in each case, would be subject to the application of paragraph 85(1)(e.2)?
Position: No.
Reasons: Based on the specific unique facts of the present situation, it would not be reasonable to regard any part of the excess, as described in paragraph 85(1)(e.2), as a benefit that Subco 2 or Subco 3 desired to have conferred on a person related to Subco 2 or Subco 3. Consequently, paragraph 85(1)(e.2) would not apply. However, in another case, depending on its specific facts, paragraph 85(1)(e.2) could apply.