Search - 阿里拍卖 司法拍卖
Results 1 - 10 of 1641 for 阿里拍卖 司法拍卖
Technical Interpretation - External summary
7 February 1994 External T.I. 9309865 F - 6363-1 Foreign Affiliates / Cross-shareholdings / Surplus -- summary under Subsection 5902(2)
7 February 1994 External T.I. 9309865 F- 6363-1 Foreign Affiliates / Cross-shareholdings / Surplus-- summary under Subsection 5902(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Regulations- Regulation 5902- Subsection 5902(2) Where a corporation resident in Canada owns 95% of the common shares of FA1 which, in turn, owns 100% of the common shares of FA2 which, in turn, owns 5% of the commons shares of FA1, and the Canadian corporation disposes of its shares of FA1 to a third party and elects under s. 93(1), FA2 will be the particular foreign affiliate for the purposes of Regulation 5902(2)(a). ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
23 June 2014 External T.I. 2014-0528271E5 F - Terrain « adjacent » à la résidence principale -- summary under Principal Residence
23 June 2014 External T.I. 2014-0528271E5 F- Terrain « adjacent » à la résidence principale-- summary under Principal Residence Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 54- Principal Residence meaning of immediately contiguous lands The taxpayers, whose "Lot 1" included a floodplain, were legally precluded from expanding their residence until they purchased the nearby "Lot 2. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
15 December 2006 External T.I. 2006-0182471E5 F - Intérêts " explicitement identifiés " -- summary under Paragraph 12(1)(c)
15 December 2006 External T.I. 2006-0182471E5 F- Intérêts " explicitement identifiés "-- summary under Paragraph 12(1)(c) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 12- Subsection 12(1)- Paragraph 12(1)(c) whether a court order or settlement “explicitly identifies” pre-judgment interest, so as to be taxable, is question of fact Regarding requested clarification of the position in Income Tax Technical News No. 30 that all pre-judgment interest, which is “explicitly identified” as interest in a court order or out-of-court settlement, will be taxed as interest income, CRA stated: [T]he tax treatment of pre-judgment interest explicitly identified as described in your request varies according to the specific terms and conditions of each judgment or out-of-court settlement. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
15 November 2006 External T.I. 2006-0190041E5 F - Biogas / Codigestion Process / Produced for Sale -- summary under Class 43.1
15 November 2006 External T.I. 2006-0190041E5 F- Biogas / Codigestion Process / Produced for Sale-- summary under Class 43.1 Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Regulations- Schedules- Schedule II- Class 43.1 supplementation of manure with organic waste in input to anaerobic digester would disqualify it as Class 43.1 property, as would the sale of more than 50% of the biogas produced Opco, which utilizes biomass through anaerobic digestion processes in order to produce biogas (containing significant methane) will install a "digester" which, in order to increase its performance, will use a "co-digestion" process, i.e. a process that provides for the addition of, for example, organic waste to the manure, to increase biogas equivalent. ... Regarding the methane sales it stated: [T]he sale of methane is not in itself an eligible use of biogas for the purpose of determining whether property that is part of a biogas production system can be included in Class 43.1 …. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
6 February 2014 External T.I. 2013-0512191E5 - Mining Activities and SR & ED -- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development
6 February 2014 External T.I. 2013-0512191E5- Mining Activities and SR & ED-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development CEE excluded even if renounced An expenditure incurred by a resource corporation which qualifies as Canadian exploration expense cannot be a qualified expenditure in respect of SR&ED by virtue of para. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
23 January 2023 External T.I. 2020-0865161E5 F - SSUC/CEWS – Sous-alinéa 125.7(4)e)(i) et personne -- summary under Payment & Receipt
23 January 2023 External T.I. 2020-0865161E5 F- SSUC/CEWS – Sous-alinéa 125.7(4)e)(i) et personne-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt a cash-basis taxpayer can receive an amount when it is received through a third party When is an amount regarded as received by an eligible entity which has made an election under s. 125.7(4)(e)(i) to use the cash method in determining its qualifying revenues for CEWS purposes, where the amount is received by a third party before being paid to the eligible entity? CRA indicated that in this regard it would apply the principle in IT-433R, subpara. 3(a) that the meaning of the term "received" is broad enough to consider a taxpayer to have received an amount where it “was received by a person authorized to receive it on behalf of the taxpayer” – and further stated that “a person entitled to receive an amount on behalf of a taxpayer for CEWS purposes may include a person who is entitled to receive the amount for a taxpayer by inter alia an agreement or by statute.” ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
30 October 2003 External T.I. 2003-0037465 F - Subsections 40(3.3) & 40(3.4) -- summary under Subsection 40(3.4)
30 October 2003 External T.I. 2003-0037465 F- Subsections 40(3.3) & 40(3.4)-- summary under Subsection 40(3.4) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 40- Subsection 40(3.4) non-application of s. 40(3.4) where taxpayer acquires then immediately disposes of an additional block/ application of formula where it partially dips into existing block A taxpayer described in s. 40(3.3)(a), which on January 1, 200X had held 100 common shares of Pubco for at least three months, acquired an additional 50 shares on June 1, 200X, and on June 2, 200X, disposed of those additional shares to an unaffiliated person, sustaining a capital loss.. ... CCRA indicated that although s. 40(3.4) would apply, under its administrative position, only 1/2 of the taxpayer's loss would be considered to be nil under s. 40(3.4)(a) under the formula: Deemed nil loss = (the lesser of S, P and B) / S x L where S = the number of shares disposed of at that time 100 P = the number of shares acquired during the period described in paragraph 40(3.3)(b) 50 B = the number of shares remaining at the end of that period 50 L = the loss on the disposition otherwise determined And therefore: Deemed nil loss = 50 / 100 x L CCRA indicated that s. 40(3.4) would apply to the entire loss arising under a second variation, under which, on June 1, 200X, the taxpayer disposed of 50 of the 100 Pubco common shares and on June 2, 200X, acquired an additional 50 Pubco common shares of Pubco. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
17 February 2017 External T.I. 2016-0662341E5 - Airline passes – retired and current employees -- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(a)
17 February 2017 External T.I. 2016-0662341E5- Airline passes – retired and current employees-- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(a) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 6- Subsection 6(1)- Paragraph 6(1)(a) use of space-confirmed, but not standby, passes by airline employees is taxable Will S2-F3-C2 be revised to reflect the administrative policies in IT-470R, paras. 42, 44 respecting standby airline passes provided to current airline employees (“current employees”) and standby and space-confirmed airline passes provided to retired airline employees (“retired employees”)? ... …[S]tandby and space-confirmed airline passes used by retired employees are not taxed. … S2-F3-C2 … provide[s] CRA’s interpretive positions, not administrative policies. … The CRA webpage, Benefits and allowances, will be updated to include these administrative policies. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
15 January 2021 External T.I. 2020-0847781E5 - CEWS - remuneration / SSUC - rémunération -- summary under Eligible Employee
Q.2 … The 14 day remuneration condition should be examined based on whether remuneration was paid in respect of a qualifying period and not on the remuneration that was actually paid during a qualifying period. We have provided some additional guidance in question 17-6 …. Q.3 … Although the value of a non-cash taxable benefit is received by the employee because of employment, the value of such benefit is not eligible remuneration paid to an eligible employee for purposes of computing the wage subsidy. Therefore … remuneration for the purpose of the definition of an “eligible employee” … would not necessarily be the same as “eligible remuneration” paid to an eligible employee for purposes of the calculation of the CEWS …. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
25 January 2018 External T.I. 2017-0709241E5 - Subsections 125(3.2) & 125(5.1) -- summary under Subsection 125(5.1)
25 January 2018 External T.I. 2017-0709241E5- Subsections 125(3.2) & 125(5.1)-- summary under Subsection 125(5.1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 125- Subsection 125(5.1) business limit is ground first based on taxable capital before it can be assigned Does the assignment of the business limit under s. 125(3.2) occur before or after the business limit reduction in s. 125(5.1)? After noting that under s. 125(5.1) “the business limit … is reduced on a straight-line basis if the total of the taxable capital of the CCPC (employed in Canada) and, if applicable, of [associated] corporations … exceeds $10 million … [so that] once the taxable capital … reaches $15 million its business limit would be zero,” CRA stated:. ...