Search - 辐射监测仪 校准

(v) 173235 retained the unsecured debt (variously described as $1,281,110 or $1,150,000 — the precise amount is not material) previously owed by 860 to Central Trust Company. ...

The Minister verified each of the said charges, per item, and the actual cost of the hotel room, as per invoices from the Ottawa Congress Centre and the Westin Hotel, and contained at Tabs 7 & 8 of the Respondent’s Book of Documents, and Schedule I and II herein. ...

Rolls Ct.) as cited by the Supreme Court in James Richardson & Sons Ltd. v. ...

.: — La Couronne se pourvoit contre des jugements prononcés par la Cour supérieure, à Québec, les 11 novembre et 13 décembre 1985, par l'honorable juge en chef Pierre Côté (m.a. pp. 60 à 67). ...

The plaintiffs received the following amounts as benefits under the plans: 1986 1987 1988 Dagenais $4,297.32 $10,166.28 $18,487.30 Halwachs N/A $13,852.72 N/A York N/A $ 2,092.80 N/A Paragraphs 6(1)(a) and 6(1)(f) of the Income Tax Act are the relevant statutory provisions in this appeal. ...

Valeo, supra, at p. 669 ”... every appropriation made by Congress uses public money in a manner to which some taxpayers object”. ...

S & S Properties Limited v Her Majesty the Queen, [1978] CTC 412; 78 DTC 6294 at 419 [6298] where Walsh, J in quoting from Roy M Powers Her Majesty the Queen, [1975] CTC 580; 75 DTC 5388 and the judgment of Addy, J therein states: Yet, one cannot say that, as a matter of law, every land developer is precluded from establishing that in a particular case there was no primary or secondary intention to speculate anymore than in a case such as the one at Bar where a mature man has never previously resold a piece of real estate at a profit, is one precluded from finding that, on his very first venture in this sphere, he did in fact have the intention of reselling at a profit when he originally purchased the lands. ...

Michael’s carried with it an appointment to the University — Dr. Marotta became a lecturer. ...

It is in this sense he was understood by the learned trial Judge, who, on this footing, puts the issue as follows: “... the sole question to be determined is whether or not there was a sale of the goods by the company to the retailers.?? ...

I set out the letter of commitment which was written to the special counsel retained by the tax department; it is as follows: Mr C Gordon Dilts, Barrister & Solicitor, 503 Electric Railway Chambers, WINNIPEG, Manitoba. ...