Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

Filter by Type:

Results 151 - 160 of 797 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

7 June 2010 Internal T.I. 2009-0351031I7 F - Faillite changée en proposition -- summary under Subparagraph 128(2)(g)(iii)

. [T]he discharge from bankruptcy is not retroactive to the time the individual was declared bankrupt but is effective from the date the proposal is approved by the court. Although section 128 does not recognize proposals filed under the BIA, the discharge from bankruptcy [in] 2005 does not invalidate the filing and assessment of pre- and post-bankruptcy tax returns made prior to the date of discharge. [T]he individual was bankrupt in the 2003 2004 and the 2005 taxation year[s]. ... Since the approval of the proposal by the Court and the discharge of the individual's bankruptcy does not amount to an unconditional discharge under paragraph 128(2)(g) we do not believe that this paragraph deems the unused portion of his tuition tax credits to be nil. Consequently, the individual may carry forward the unused portion of his or her tuition tax credits at the end of the 2005 taxation year to the 2006 taxation year pursuant to section 118.61. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

24 October 2017 Internal T.I. 2017-0719531I7 - Section 22 election and carrying on a business -- summary under Subsection 22(1)

In finding that the condition in s. 22, that there still be outstanding accounts receivable that were required to be included in computing Amalco’s income in respect of that business, appeared to not be met, CRA stated: The only inclusion in income [of] Amalco in respect of accounts receivable of Predecessor 1 is under 12(1)(d) and it includes in its income a reserve (there is no presumption that the underlying receivable was included by Amalco in its income). Respecting the requirement that Amalco have carried on the Business, the Directorate stated: [Y]ou express the view that because Amalco sold the assets used in the Businesses minutes after the amalgamation, it did not “carry on the business” of Predecessor 1, hence the election under section 22 was not valid. That view might arguably be consistent with Gillen …. However, the Directorate concluded that the election was satisfied (on the basis that the other conditions of s. 22 were satisfied and the business was continued) stating: Provided there is no disruption in the continued operation of the business the context and purpose of section 22 are satisfied where a corporation resulting from an amalgamation that is governed by section 87 or its predecessor have included receivables from that business in their income and have used property in carrying on that business. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

14 October 2011 Internal T.I. 2011-0410781I7 F - Repas fournis gratuitement -- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(a)

14 October 2011 Internal T.I. 2011-0410781I7 F- Repas fournis gratuitement-- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(a) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 6- Subsection 6(1)- Paragraph 6(1)(a) benefit from free meals delivered on-site Respecting a proposal that employees would receive a catered meal service during their shifts, CRA stated: [T]o the extent the provision of free meals primarily benefits the employees and not primarily their employer, the value of that benefit should be included in computing the income of those employees. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

22 June 2001 Internal T.I. 2001-0078457 F - Décret remise d'impôt revenu gagné au Québec -- summary under Paragraph (a)

A taxable capital gain from the disposition of a "Canadian resource property" is therefore not included pursuant to subparagraph 115(1)(a)(iii) …. [Furthermore] it is highly doubtful that the Right can be considered real property …. Article 900 of the Civil Code of Québec, which states that "fruits and other products of the soil may be considered to be movables when they are the object of an act of alienation,” leads us to believe that the Right would not constitute immovable property but rather movable property. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

19 May 2020 Internal T.I. 2020-0841791I7 - Application of paragraph 111(4)(e) -- summary under Paragraph 111(4)(e)

The Directorate stated: [P]aragraph 13(34)(a) states that where a taxpayer carries on a particular business, there is deemed to be a single goodwill in respect of the particular business. [T]he goodwill and the customer relationship constitute a single property, being the goodwill in respect of the Taxpayer’s business. 2017-0709141C6 confirmed that a designation pursuant to paragraph 111(4)(e) can be made with respect to internally generated goodwill. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

24 April 2012 Internal T.I. 2011-0400671I7 F - Honoraires professionnels -- summary under Start-Up and Liquidation Costs

After referring to s. 123.7 et seq. pf the Quebec Companies Act (providing inter alia that “A company is bound by any deed performed in its interest before its constitution provided it ratifies the deed within 90 days after its constitution”), the Directorate stated: Where there is no legislation similar to the Quebec Companies Act, the Canada Revenue Agency ("CRA") will normally accept newly incorporated corporation recognizing transactions prior to its incorporation if the conditions, as set out in IT-454 [para. 3] are met …. ... B intended, when entering into the agreements with these two parties, to form Company D nor that the latter was the entity that was to deduct the fees. With respect to the fees paid to Advisor B, the situation is, in our view, somewhat different because, based on the facts you have provided, Corporation D was formed as soon as the mandate was granted to Advisor B. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

9 April 2003 Internal T.I. 2003-0001597 F - FRAIS ACCESSOIRES -- summary under Subsection 18(3.1)

Also released under document number 2003-00015970.
9 April 2003 Internal T.I. 2003-0001597 F- FRAIS ACCESSOIRES-- summary under Subsection 18(3.1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 18- Subsection 18(3.1) application of s. 18(3.1) to work on a rental property The Directorate indicated that s. 18(3.1) applied to the following categories of expenditures if work on a rental building constituted a renovation rather than repair and maintenance work giving rise to currently deductible expenses: Property taxes during the renovation period that are related to the ownership of the land subjacent to the building …. [P]roperty taxes related to the ownership of land that meets the following conditions: 1. it is contiguous to the land subjacent to the building 2. it is used, or intended to be used, as a parking lot, driveway, yard or garden or for a similar purpose 3. it is necessary for the present or proposed use of the building. Interest charges on the portion of the mortgage obtained to renovate the building that relates to the renovation period [and] interest charges on the portion of the mortgage used to acquire the land described above that relates to the renovation period. Insurance and utility costs only to the extent that they relate to the renovation. For example, this would be the case for additional insurance costs that the taxpayer had to incur to cover a risk related to the renovation. Legal costs related to obtaining financing for the renovation [and] the legal costs of acquiring the building and land …. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

5 December 2012 Internal T.I. 2012-0439301I7 F - Reassessment beyond the normal reassessment period -- summary under Section 96

Furthermore …., under civil and common law, a partnership is simply the relationship that exists between persons or partners who carry on a business in common for profit. ... We refer you to Klein [which] stated: …[T]he partnership itself does not have the capacity to be indebted. The debt of the partnership is owed by the partners …. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

8 January 2009 Internal T.I. 2008-0299371I7 F - Montant pour enfant -- summary under Paragraph 118(1)(b.1)

B cannot claim the children's amount in respect of any of her children since …she is not entitled to the wholly dependent person credit in respect of them and none of the children ordinarily reside throughout the year with her and another parent. [I]t is Mr. A who would be entitled to the child amount under paragraph 118(1)(b.1) for both children since he would be able to claim the wholly dependent person credit for his two children if paragraph 118(4)(a) did not apply to him for the year. [U]nder paragraph 118(4)(a), Mr. A would not be able to claim the wholly dependent person credit in respect of more than one of his children …. ...

Pages