Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

Filter by Type:

Results 11 - 20 of 1651 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
Technical Interpretation - External summary

29 September 2020 External T.I. 2018-0757501E5 F - Crédit pour intérêts sur les prêts étudiants -- summary under Payment & Receipt

29 September 2020 External T.I. 2018-0757501E5 F- Crédit pour intérêts sur les prêts étudiants-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt capitalization of interest on a novation under Quebec law would constitute its payment A Quebec post-secondary student loan program provided for an initial 12-month “full exemption period” (in which the Quebec government paid the interest charged on the loan by the lender) and a subsequent six-month “partial exemption period” (during which the student borrower was required to pay interest on the loan balance). ... In addressing whether such capitalized interest qualified as being “paid” under a “loan made” under the Quebec financial assistance program so as to generate a credit under s. 118.62, CRA stated: By virtue of the Civil Code of Quebec, there can be payment where there is a handing over of money [(“tradition d’argent”)] between the debtor and the creditor or where there is novation by change of debt. The mere addition of accrued interest to the principal amount of an original debt is generally not sufficient in itself to constitute a payment of such interest. If the addition of interest to the principal qualifies as a novation the amount of interest will be considered paid when the novation occurs and will be eligible for the credit by virtue of section 118.62, if all the conditions set out in that section are otherwise satisfied. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

15 January 2021 External T.I. 2020-0847781E5 - CEWS - remuneration / SSUC - rémunération -- summary under Eligible Employee

Q.2 The 14 day remuneration condition should be examined based on whether remuneration was paid in respect of a qualifying period and not on the remuneration that was actually paid during a qualifying period. We have provided some additional guidance in question 17-6 …. Q.3 Although the value of a non-cash taxable benefit is received by the employee because of employment, the value of such benefit is not eligible remuneration paid to an eligible employee for purposes of computing the wage subsidy. Therefore remuneration for the purpose of the definition of an “eligible employee” would not necessarily be the same as “eligible remuneration” paid to an eligible employee for purposes of the calculation of the CEWS …. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

7 November 1994 External T.I. 9400965 - U.S. REAL PROPERTY INTEREST & FTC (5638-2) -- summary under Article 24

REAL PROPERTY INTEREST & FTC (5638-2)-- summary under Article 24 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 24 FTC for U.S. ... Income Tax Convention …, the U.S. has the right to tax Mr. A's gains on the disposition of his Canco's shares, as described above. ... As a result Mr. A would qualify to claim a foreign tax credit under subsection 126(1) in respect of [such] U.S. tax liability…. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

25 July 2019 External T.I. 2018-0787011E5 - Spousal support - legal expenses & lump-sum awards -- summary under Legal and other Professional Fees

This would be the case as long as the support claim is bona fide and with a reasonable chance of success, and even if the claim for support is unsuccessful …. Conversely, where an individual starts a support claim for the purpose of collecting a lump-sum payment that does not qualify as a support amount …, the individual is not entitled to deduct legal and accounting fees incurred for that purpose. Assuming that the support claim was started to establish or collect support amounts no adjustments to the individual’s prior years’ tax returns would be warranted to exclude the legal expenses previously deducted in computing the individual’s income. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

23 January 2015 External T.I. 2013-0509771E5 - Oil & gas payments made to U.S. resident -- summary under Regulation 805

A, a U.S. resident, grants the right to drill for or take the oil & gas from his Canadian freehold property to a Canadian company, in consideration inter alia for annual royalties payable out of any oil & gas production. ... A carries on a business through a PE in Canada and the oil & gas royalties are attributable to the PE, Part XIII… of the Act does not apply, and the company is not required to withhold tax…. ... The company is required to… use the exemption code "S" …. Where neither paragraph 805(a) nor (b)… apply, the annual royalties paid to Mr. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

23 January 2015 External T.I. 2013-0509771E5 - Oil & gas payments made to U.S. resident -- summary under F

23 January 2015 External T.I. 2013-0509771E5- Oil & gas payments made to U.S. resident-- summary under F Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 66.4- Subsection 66.4(5)- F FMV addition and subtraction where drilling rights are granted for royalty Mr. A, a U.S. resident, grants the right to drill for or take the oil & gas from his Canadian freehold property to a Canadian company, in consideration for an upfront bonus of $100,000, and annual royalties payable out of any oil & gas production. ... However, the proceeds of disposition (i.e., $100,000 + $300,000) of the CRP (i.e. the drilling etc. rights given to the Canadian company) were subtracted from his CCOGPE pool under variable F. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

18 September 2001 External T.I. 2001-0095265 F - TAXE SUR LE CAPITAL -- summary under Payment & Receipt

18 September 2001 External T.I. 2001-0095265 F- TAXE SUR LE CAPITAL-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt in Quebec, a cheque is not payment until the debtor’s account is debited In indicating that outstanding cheques of a corporation do not represent loans or advances, CCRA stated: The delivery of a cheque (other than a certified cheque, money order or any other equivalent instrument) by a corporation governed by the Civil Code does not constitute a payment since, according to Article 1564 of the Civil Code, the payment transaction cannot be completed until the debtor's bank has actually paid the amount. Consequently, the payment date is considered to be the date on which the cheque is honoured or discharged by the bank, which normally occurs on the date on which the cheque in question is debited from the debtor's account. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

2 August 2013 External T.I. 2013-0475261E5 - Eligible Dividend - Late Filing 89(14.1) & 184(3) -- summary under Subsection 89(14.1)

2 August 2013 External T.I. 2013-0475261E5- Eligible Dividend- Late Filing 89(14.1) & 184(3)-- summary under Subsection 89(14.1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 89- Subsection 89(14.1) A Canadian-controlled private corporation makes a s. 184(3) election to deem the excess portion of a capital dividend to be a separate taxable dividend. ... CRA indicated that it would accept a late designation request made within three years, to the extent of a GRIP balance to support an eligible dividend designation, provided the following conditions are met: * The taxpayers took reasonable steps and care to comply with the requirements in respect of subsection 83(2) and the computation of the capital dividend account at the time that the capital dividend election was originally made; * The late designation request under subsection 89(14.1) was not specifically intended by the taxpayers at the time that the subsection 83(2) election was made nor does the late designation request form part of a series of requests made on a regular basis; and, * The late designation request does not involve aggressive tax planning. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

30 April 2009 External T.I. 2008-0296721E5 F - Late filed election 85(7) - Amending transactions -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

30 April 2009 External T.I. 2008-0296721E5 F- Late filed election 85(7)- Amending transactions-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission CRA will not anticipate a judicial rectification An individual transferred an immovable to his corporation for non-share consideration, and after being reassessed by CRA for the resulting gain, filed a late s. 85(7) election showing preferred share consideration and proposed to validate such late election by entering into a "deed of correction" with the corporation providing for the shares’ issuance. ... [E]ven if the "deed of correction" of the Contract …were to be entered into CRA could not take it into account for the purposes of determining the tax consequences of the transfer of the Immovable. Consequently, CRA would not be able to accept a late election filed by the taxpayer and the Corporation under subsection 85(7) since, based on the Contract initially entered into one of the conditions set out in subsection 85(1) (i.e., the issuance by the Corporation of share consideration) would not have been satisfied. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

3 February 2005 External T.I. 2005-0111871E5 F - Intérêts / mise à part de l'argent -- summary under Subparagraph 20(1)(c)(i)

3 February 2005 External T.I. 2005-0111871E5 F- Intérêts / mise à part de l'argent-- summary under Subparagraph 20(1)(c)(i) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 20- Subsection 20(1)- Paragraph 20(1)(c)- Subparagraph 20(1)(c)(i) cash damming to pay current deductible business expenses is an eligible use which continues with the business Regarding the deductibility of interest on borrowed money used for current business expenses in a cash damming context, CRA stated: Where the borrowed money is used to pay a current expense that is incurred for the purpose of earning business income and is deductible the test of a direct connection is satisfied in the year the expense is incurred and in subsequent years. [I]nterest on borrowed money used to pay a current expense incurred to earn business income will continue to be deductible as long as the source of income, the business, does not disappear. However, the provisions of section 20.1 could, depending on the case, allow the interest to be deductible after the source of income has disappeared. [T[he total value of the assets of the business is not a criterion for determining whether interest on borrowed money used to pay a current expense incurred to earn business income is deductible. ...

Pages