Search - 微信撤回和删除的区别 官方

Filter by Type:

Results 231 - 240 of 79046 for 微信撤回和删除的区别 官方
Administrative Policy summary

Application Policy SR & ED 96-07 "Prototypes, Custom Products/Commercial Assets, Pilot Plants and Experimental Production" -- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development

Application Policy SR & ED 96-07 "Prototypes, Custom Products/Commercial Assets, Pilot Plants and Experimental Production"-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development ...
Administrative Policy summary

Application Policy SR & ED 96-04 "Payments to Third Parties for SR & ED". -- summary under Subsection 37(1)

Application Policy SR & ED 96-04 "Payments to Third Parties for SR & ED".-- summary under Subsection 37(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 37- Subsection 37(1) ...
GST/HST Ruling

29 November 2012 GST/HST Ruling 123441 - – […] [Music Programs]

[XYZ] provides [#] [music programs]. […]. You provided the following descriptions of the [music programs]: * […] [Descriptions of Programs A & Program B] […] 2. According to the information provided by […], the following musical concepts are taught in […] [Program B]: […] 3. […] [Students] may start […][the] programs at any age. […]. A certain set of skills must be evident before a [student] moves on to the next class. 4. […] 5. […]. 6. […] 7. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

14 June 2007 Internal T.I. 2007-0229311I7 F - Capital Dividend Account -- summary under Payment & Receipt

14 June 2007 Internal T.I. 2007-0229311I7 F- Capital Dividend Account-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt making accounting entries does not constitute payment of a dividend After noting that payment of two back-to-back capital dividends (from “Subco” to “Parentco,” and form it to its individual shareholder) had been accomplished only by accounting entries, the Directorate found that this was insufficient to give rise to a capital dividend “received” by Parentco, so that there had been no addition to its capital dividend account. In this regard, it stated: [T]he mere making of the accounting entries does not in itself constitute the payment of a dividend by either Subco or Parentco. [H]owever a dividend can be paid by a corporation and received by its recipient without any monetary movement, for example, by the issuance of a demand note that is accepted as an absolute payment by the recipient. ...
Ministerial Letter

4 December 1989 Ministerial Letter 73828A F - Integrated Sawmill & Pulpmill Subsection 125.1(1) - M & P Deduction

4 December 1989 Ministerial Letter 73828A F- Integrated Sawmill & Pulpmill Subsection 125.1(1)- M & P Deduction Unedited CRA Tags 125.1(1), 5202   December 4, 1989 E.H. ... In the Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, "handling" is defined as follows:      "a process by which something is handled in a commercial transaction, especially the packaging and shipping of an abject or material (as to a consumer)... ... Conclusion 24(1) DirectorBilingual Services & ResourceIndustries DivisionRulings Directorate ...
Decision summary

Mandel v. 1909975 Ontario Inc., 2020 ONSC 5343 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

., 2020 ONSC 5343-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission jurisdiction declined in a requested shareholding rectification whose raison d’être was a CRA assessment In order to avoid a deemed disposition under the s. 104(4) 21-year deemed realization rule, two family trusts for the children of Mr. ... In declining to assume jurisdiction, Koehnen J stated (at paras 32, 35): [T]he Tax Court has jurisdiction to interpret s. 23(3) of the OBCA. Parliament has created a specific court with expertise in tax matters and has created a specific process to address tax issues. ... The corporate records accurately reflect that intention. [T]he applicants do not require a court order to correct the books and records of the Child Corporations. ...
Conference summary

10 October 2014 APFF Roundtable Q. 15, 2014-0538151C6 F - 2014 APFF Roundtable, Q. 15 - Section 143.4 & Reverse Earn-out -- summary under Subsection 143.4(2)

10 October 2014 APFF Roundtable Q. 15, 2014-0538151C6 F- 2014 APFF Roundtable, Q. 15- Section 143.4 & Reverse Earn-out-- summary under Subsection 143.4(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 143.4- Subsection 143.4(2) reverse earnout obligation of Buyco re Target shares A newly formed corporation ("Newco") purchases the shares of a target corporation ("Target") for consideration that includes an earn-out clause (resulting in a debt which is subsequently forgiven). ... However we can offer the following general comments which nonetheless, in some circumstances, would not apply in a particular situation. (a) …[A] reduction in the cost of the shares in the capital stock of Target through the application of subsection 143.4(2) prior to the amalgamation would in general permit the debt to qualify as "excluded obligation" as defined in subsection 80(1), by reason of the application of paragraph (a) of that definition. ...
EC decision

Minister of National Revenue v. Howson & Howson Limited and Howson & Howson Co. (Cargill) Limited, [1970] CTC 36, 70 DTC 6055

Howson & Howson Limited and Howson & Howson Co. (Cargill) Limited, [1970] CTC 36, 70 DTC 6055 CATTANACH, J. ... Howson 900 William F. Howson (a son of W. Fred) 900 Douglas Howson (a son of W. ... These three companies, Howson & Howson Limited, Howson & Howson (Cargill) Limited and Howson & Howson (Wingham) Limited carried on business until 1956. ...
Decision summary

Haworth & Ors v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs, [2025] EWCA Civ 822 -- summary under Article 4

Haworth & Ors v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs, [2025] EWCA Civ 822-- summary under Article 4 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 4 the place of effective management of trusts for treaty tie-breaker purposes was in the UK even though their CMC might be in Mauritius The UK-resident taxpayers sought to avoid capital gains tax respecting the disposal of shares by family trusts of which they were the settlors by relying on a "Round the World" tax plan. ... If the trustees were appointed because it was appreciated that fulfilment of their responsibilities would cause them to take the decisions, the POEM of the trust might not be in the jurisdiction from which the trustees come. [Here] the role of the trustees in Mauritius was effectively pre-determined. [T]he settlors, albeit with the advice and assistance of advisers, decided to adopt "an overall single plan" and, to that end, exercised their powers to appoint the Mauritius Trustees for a limited period "in the confident expectation that they would implement the plan". ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

30 October 2003 External T.I. 2003-0037465 F - Subsections 40(3.3) & 40(3.4) -- summary under Subsection 40(3.4)

30 October 2003 External T.I. 2003-0037465 F- Subsections 40(3.3) & 40(3.4)-- summary under Subsection 40(3.4) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 40- Subsection 40(3.4) non-application of s. 40(3.4) where taxpayer acquires then immediately disposes of an additional block/ application of formula where it partially dips into existing block A taxpayer described in s. 40(3.3)(a), which on January 1, 200X had held 100 common shares of Pubco for at least three months, acquired an additional 50 shares on June 1, 200X, and on June 2, 200X, disposed of those additional shares to an unaffiliated person, sustaining a capital loss.. ... CCRA indicated that although s. 40(3.4) would apply, under its administrative position, only 1/2 of the taxpayer's loss would be considered to be nil under s. 40(3.4)(a) under the formula: Deemed nil loss = (the lesser of S, P and B) / S x L where S = the number of shares disposed of at that time 100 P = the number of shares acquired during the period described in paragraph 40(3.3)(b) 50 B = the number of shares remaining at the end of that period 50 L = the loss on the disposition otherwise determined And therefore: Deemed nil loss = 50 / 100 x L CCRA indicated that s. 40(3.4) would apply to the entire loss arising under a second variation, under which, on June 1, 200X, the taxpayer disposed of 50 of the 100 Pubco common shares and on June 2, 200X, acquired an additional 50 Pubco common shares of Pubco. ...

Pages