Income Tax Severed Letters - 2020-12-09

Conference

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 1, 2020-0839931C6 - Executor's Year of a GRE

Unedited CRA Tags
104(6), 104(13), 104(24)
CRA executor’s year policy is relevant only where the executor’s year extends beyond the GRE’s taxation year
elaboration of executor's year policy
scope of application of s. 104(13.3)

Principal Issues: When should the guidance in paragraph 6 of IT-286R2 apply to the income of a graduated rate estate (GRE)?

Position: Whether paragraph 6 can be applied in a given situation depends on the terms of the will, and whether the final year of the GRE ends after the executor's year.

Reasons: See detailed discussion.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 2, 2020-0840001C6 - Subsection 104(13.4) and LCBs

Unedited CRA Tags
104(13.4)(a), 104(13.4)(c), 104(4)(a),(a.1),(a.4), 111(1)(b), 150(1), 161(1), balance-due day in 248(1)
a capital loss in the tax year following the death of an alter ego trust’s settlor can eliminate interest on the terminal T3 return’s 104(4)(a) gain
s. 104(13.4)(c) extension of balance-due date for terminal stub year of alter ego/joint spousal trust can permit capital loss in subsequent stub year to eliminate terminal year interest

Principal Issues: Paragraph 104(13.4)(a) applies to alter ego, joint spousal and certain other trusts. Where the provision applies, the trust will have two taxation years in the same calendar year. Consider a situation where the trust realizes a capital gain in the first taxation year and realizes a capital loss in the second taxation year. 1. What is the proper method for ensuring the capital loss is applied in the first taxation year? 2. Where the net capital loss carried back (LCB) is at least equal to the taxable capital gain in the first taxation year, will arrears interest be charged in respect of tax payable in the first taxation year?

Position: 1. The capital loss realized in the second taxation year must be reported in the T3 return for that year and the LCB request must be made by filing a T3A form. The T3A form should be filed on or before the balance-due day for the first taxation year. 2. The LCB request will be processed after the notice of assessment for the first taxation year is issued. Where the tax payable reported on the return for first taxation year is not paid on the balance-due day, the notice of assessment will reflect arrears interest. However, where the LCB request is filed on or before the "balance-due day" of the first taxation year and the net capital loss is at least equal to the taxable capital gain in the first taxation year, arrears interest reported on the notice of reassessment should be reversed.

Reasons: 1. The date on which the T3 return is due, and the “balance-due day” for the first taxation year is extended by paragraph 104(13.4)(c) to be 90 days within the end of the calendar year in which the taxation year ends. 2. The application of the LCB as described will result in no tax payable at the balance-due day for the first taxation year. Accordingly, arrears interest should not apply.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 3, 2020-0839881C6 - Distribution of taxable capital gain

Unedited CRA Tags
104(21)
only the taxable portion of a capital gain need be distributed for s. 104(21) purposes

Principal Issues: For a subsection 104(21) designation to be effective with respect to a taxable capital gain designated by the trust in respect of a particular beneficiary, is it necessary for the trust to also pay or make payable the non-taxable portion of the capital gain realized by the trust?

Position: No. However, the terms of the trust instrument must permit or authorize the trustee to determine whether or not to pay or make payable such amounts and to make any such designations.

Reasons: See below.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 4, 2020-0838001C6 - Foreign Tax Credit

Unedited CRA Tags
126(1); 126(7) "non-business-income tax"; Canada-UK Treaty, Canada-Australia Treaty
a capital gain’s geographic source for Canadian FTC purposes was re-sourced to Australia under the Treaty-source rule
UK source of gain re-sourced to Australia for s. 126 purposes under Australia-Canada Treaty sourcing rule

Principal Issues: In the specified fact pattern, whether a foreign tax credit may be claimed by a Canadian resident individual in respect of tax paid to Australia on a capital gain arising from a disposition of the shares of a UK corporation by the Canadian resident individual.

Position: Yes, subject to the computational rules in subsection 126(1) of the Act.

Reasons: Articles 22(2) and 23(2)(a) of the Canada-Australia Treaty operate in conjunction with subsection 126(1) of the Income Tax Act to provide a foreign tax credit.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 5, 2020-0847181C6 - Subsections 40(3.61) and 164(6)

Unedited CRA Tags
39(1), 40(1), 40(3.4), 40(3.6), 40(3.61), 164(6)
ss. 40(3.61) and (3.6), and 164(6), not applied iteratively to eliminate a s. 164(6) loss carryback where the estate also realized a small capital gain
s. 164(6)(a) applied before s. 40(3.61) so as to avoid iterative grind of s. 164(6) carryback amount

Principal Issues: Review of documents 2012-0449801C6 and 2012-0462941C6. Does the wording of subsection 40(3.61) create a circular grind of the capital loss referred to in subsection 164(6)?

Position: No. Revised position, as subsection 40(3.61) provides that subsection 40(3.4) or 40(3.6) only applies to the capital loss that remains in the estate’s hands after an election pursuant to 164(6) is made.

Reasons: A strict textual reading of subsection 40(3.61) could otherwise produce an iterative "grind", which is contrary to the intended relief of the provision.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 6, 2020-0839991C6 - Eligible offset

Unedited CRA Tags
107(1), 107(2), 108(1), 248(1) cost amount
illustration of s. 107(1)(a) application to avoid capital gain but not necessarily a capital loss
generation of a loss to a capital beneficiary attributable to an eligible offset amount

Principal Issues: Where the conditions in subsection 107(2) are met the provision will apply to a distribution of property by a personal trust, in satisfaction of a beneficiary's capital interest in the trust. Consider a situation in which at the time of the distribution, a liability exists in respect of the property. Where the beneficiary assumes a debt or other obligation in respect of the distributed property (and the transfer is conditional on such assumption of debt) this will result in an “eligible offset” as defined in subsection 108(1). What is the impact of the eligible offset?

Position: Pursuant to paragraph 107(2)(c), the eligible offset reduces the proceeds of disposition of the beneficiary’s capital interest. Depending on the circumstances, the eligible offset may not have any impact, or the beneficiary may recognize a capital loss in respect of the disposition of their capital interest.

Reasons: See examples.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 7, 2020-0837611C6 - TOSI and Rental Property

Unedited CRA Tags
120.4(1)
TOSI does not apply to rental properties held by individual co-owners

Principal Issues: Whether rental income and capital gains from real property held directly by related individuals (other than trusts) in a co-tenancy would be subject to TOSI.

Position: No.

Reasons: Based on the definition of “split income” in 120.4(1).

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 8, 2020-0837621C6 - TOSI and Donations

Unedited CRA Tags
120.4(3)
charitable credits do not reduce an individual’s TOSI

Principal Issues: Whether an individual whose only income is subject to the TOSI can apply the charitable donation tax credit to reduce their tax payable pursuant to the TOSI.

Position: No.

Reasons: Based on subsection 120.4(3).

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 9, 2020-0837631C6 - TOSI - Excluded Business

Unedited CRA Tags
120.4 (1), 120.4 (1.1)
a specified individual splitting full-time work amongst multiple corporations might meet the excluded business activity test on less than 4 hours per week per corporation
hours worked for multiple corporations cannot be aggregated for purposes of the 20-hour test

Principal Issues: Can an individual meet regular, continuous and substantial basis test in paragraph 120.4(1.1)(a) if they work a cumulative total of 20 hours a week in a group of related businesses?

Position: No. But depending on the facts each business may still be an excluded business of that individual under the more general test.

Reasons: See Below.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 10, 2020-0837641C6 - TOSI - Excluded Business

Unedited CRA Tags
120.4 (1), 120.4 (1.1)
investing carried on with the proceeds of sale of a business in which the spousal shareholders had been engaged full time generally would generate TOSI on resulting dividends
questioned availability of excluded business exception where investing activity

Principal Issues: Whether dividends would be exempt from split income where the corporation’s former business operations have ceased and it now only earns income from investment activities. The individuals were not subject to TOSI on dividends they received from the corporation when the former business was carried on due to the excluded business exception.

Position: Question of fact. However, if the corporation is considered to be carrying on an investment business that is a related business, if the conditions of excluded business are not satisfied with respect to that investment business then TOSI would apply unless another excluded amount exception applies.

Reasons: Legislation and previous positions.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 11, 2020-0839891C6 - Subsection 104(19)

Unedited CRA Tags
104(13), 104(19), 249(1) and 249.1(1)
Pt IV tax exemption no longer available because corporate beneficiary was no longer connected at December 31 effective time of s. 104(19) designation
dividend subject to Pt IV tax because payer and corporate beneficiary no longer connected at December 31 effective date of all s. 104(19) designations
designated dividend included in individual’s terminal return which has a December 31 year end
individual has a calendar year, even in terminal year

Principal Issues: Various questions involving subsection 104(19).

Position: General comments only.

Reasons: See below.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 12, 2020-0839981C6 - 21 year planning, 107(5) and TCP

Unedited CRA Tags
107(5); 104(4); 107(2); 107(2.1)
distributions by a Canadian discretionary trust to a NR-owned Canadian corporate beneficiary of TCP not carved-out in s. 107(5) appear abusive
s. 107(2) rollout by Canadian discretionary trust to a NR-owned Canadian corporate beneficiary appears abusive

Principal Issues: Can the CRA comment on the tax implications associated with the distribution of taxable Canadian property (other than property described in subparagraphs 128.1(4)(b)(i) to (iii)) from a discretionary family trust to a Canadian corporation that is wholly owned by a non-resident individual in order to avoid the application of subsection 107(5)?

Position: GAAR likely applicable.

Reasons: The transaction described circumvents the application of subsections 107(5) and 107(2.1).

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 13, 2020-0847201C6 - GRE & section 216 election

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1) graduated rate estate; 216; 107(2), 107(5), 117(2). 3(1) and 33(2) of the Interpretation Act
a non-resident estate (using GRE graduated rates), then its residuary beneficiaries, could file under s. 216 respecting a Canadian rental property
non-resident estate can be GRE and file s. 216 returns
s. 107(2) applicable to distribution by NR estate of Canadian rental property NR residuary beneficiaries

Principal Issues: 1. Can a graduated rate estate (GRE) elect under section 216 in respect of a rental property of a deceased taxpayer? 2. Once the estate is administered, can each non-resident beneficiary’s interest in the property be distributed to them pursuant to subsection 107(2)? 3. Will the non-resident beneficiaries be able to elect under section 216?

Position: 1. A GRE can make a section 216 election. 2. Yes, depending on the facts, circumstances and applicable law and assuming the conditions in subsection 107(2) are otherwise met. 3. Based on the current wording of section 216 and assuming the conditions therein are met, the beneficiaries would be able to make a section 216 election.

Reasons: 1. The definition of GRE in subsection 248(1) contemplates both a return of income under Part I filed pursuant to a section 216 election in respect of a Part XIII tax liability and a “regular” Part I return of income. 2. Subsection 107(5) does not apply to the distribution. Assuming the distribution of the rental property to Y and Z is made out of the residue of the Estate and transferred to them in accordance with the provisions of the Will in satisfaction of all or any part of their interests in the capital of the Estate, then subsection 107(2) could apply to allow a tax-deferred rollover on the distribution of the rental properties to Y and Z. 3. Once the beneficiaries each hold beneficial ownership of their interest in the rental property, they could meet the conditions in section 216.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 14, 2020-0839961C6 - Adjusted Aggregate Investment Income

Unedited CRA Tags
125(5.1)
s. 125(5.2)(c) references a reason of reducing the associated group’s AAII for purposes of the passive income reduction rule in s. 125(5.1)(b)

Principal Issues: If the anti-avoidance rule in subsection 125(5.2) would apply in a situation where a corporation transfers active assets to a related corporation?

Position: Question of fact.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 15, 2020-0839951C6 - Subsection 164(6) limitations

Unedited CRA Tags
164(6); 220(3.2) and Reg 600(b)
no CRA discretion to extend the one-year deadline under s. 164(6) for sustaining the post-death capital loss

Principal Issues: STEP has asked whether CRA is prepared to recommend relieving amendments to subsection 164(6) and to work with Department of Finance on such amendments.

Position: CRA would be pleased to work with Department of Finance should it seeks our assistance.

Reasons: This issue of whether subsection 164(6) should be amended involves tax policy considerations which are the purview of the Department of Finance.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 16, 2020-0839921C6 - Offshore Tax Informant Update

Principal Issues: Current statistics regarding the Offshore Tax Informant program.

Position: Response provided by CPB.

Reasons: See below.

26 November 2020 STEP Roundtable Q. 17, 2020-0837001C6 - Trust Pass-Through of CGE

Unedited CRA Tags
104(21); 104(21.2); 110.6(1); 110.6(2.1)
the QSBC share character of capital gains can be flowed out in a 2-tier trust structure
"annual gains limit" takes into account lower tier trust's ss. 104(21) and (21.2) designations

Principal Issues: 1) Where a trust makes a designation pursuant to subsections 104(21) and 104(21.2) with respect to an amount paid to a second trust and third trust, who are beneficiaries of the trust, whether the second trust and third trust can make designations pursuant to subsections 104(21) and 104(21.2) with respect to the same amount paid to their own beneficiaries? 2) If yes, can the individual beneficiaries of the second and third trust claim the capital gains exemption, assuming that all other conditions are met?

Position: 1) & 2) Yes.

Reasons: 1) & 2) See document below.

7 October 2020 APFF Roundtable Q. 18, 2020-0862931C6 F - 12(1)(x) and CEBA

Unedited CRA Tags
12(1)(x), 12(2.2), 20(1)(hh)
the parties can agree to allocate late CEBA loan repayments between the forgivable and non-forgivable loan components
bank lending under CEBA loan program is described in s. 12(1)(x)(i) and forgivable loan included on receipt
s. 12(2.2) can be applied to non-deductible expenses/consequences of CEBA loan not being forgiven

Principales Questions: Under the Canada Emergency Business Account program (“CEBA”), loans (up to a maximum of $40,000) can be provided by financial institutions to help businesses pay for non-deferrable operation expenses. Under the CEBA, 25% of the loan (up to a maximum of $10,000) can be forgiven if at least 75% of the borrowed funds are reimbursed on or before December 31, 2022. a) Whether, for the purposes of paragraph 12(1)(x), the forgivable portion of the loan could be viewed as being received at the time the borrowed funds are received by the debtor; b) Whether the forgivable portion of the loan is paid by a government, municipality or other public authority pursuant to subparagraph 12(1)(x)(ii); c) Whether subparagraph 12(1)(x)(iii) or subparagraph 12(1)(x)(iv) applies to the forgivable portion of the loan; d) At what time the forgivable portion of the loan would be included in computing the income of the debtor; e) Where a corporation with a December 31 year-end has borrowed $40,000 under the CEBA to pay for allowable non-deferrable operation expenses incurred in its 2020 taxation year: (i) At what time the corporation would include the forgivable portion of the loan; (ii) When should the election under paragraph 12(2.2) be filed; (iii) Where the borrowed money is used to pay for allowable non-deferrable operation expenses incurred in the corporation’s 2021 taxation year-end, when should the election under paragraph 12(2.2) be filed; (iv) Where the corporation has not reimbursed at least 75% of the loan on or before December 31, 2022, when would the corporation be allowed to claim the deduction under paragraph 20(1)(hh)?

Position Adoptée: a) and d) Under paragraph 12(1)(x), the forgivable portion of the loan is included in the income of the debtor in the taxation year in which the loan is received; b) The forgivable portion of the loan would be received from a person described in subparagraph 12(1)(x)(i), assuming the requirements of clause 12(1)(x)(i)(A), (B) or (C) are met; c) It could reasonably be considered that the forgivable portion of the loan has been received as assistance as a forgivable loan in respect of an outlay or expense pursuant to subparagraph 12(1)(x)(iv); e)(i) The forgivable portion of the loan would be included in the income of the corporation in its taxation year ended December 31, 2020; e)(ii) The corporation could avoid the income inclusion under paragraph 12(1)(x) by filing the election under subsection 12(2.2) with its income tax return for its 2020 taxation year to reduce the amount of allowable non-deferrable operation expenses incurred in that year; e)(iii) The corporation could avoid the income inclusion under paragraph 12(1)(x) in its 2020 taxation year by filing the election under subsection 12(2.2) with its income tax return for its 2021 taxation year to reduce the amount of allowable non-deferrable operation expenses incurred in that year; e)(iv) Where the intent of the parties is that any amount reimbursed by the corporation will be applied first in repayment of the portion of the loan that was initially forgivable, the corporation could claim a deduction under paragraph 20(1)(hh) with respect to the amount reimbursed in the taxation year in which the reimbursement is made, up to the amount included in its income pursuant to paragraph 12(1)(x). If the intent of the parties is unclear in that regard, the deduction under paragraph 20(1)(hh) would be equal to that proportion of the amount reimbursed in the taxation year that the portion of the loan that was initially forgivable is of the outstanding balance of the loan as at January 1st, 2023, due to the fungible character of the borrowed money. Under this approach, the total amount of the deduction under paragraph 20(1)(hh) will be equal to the amount of the income included under paragraph 12(1)(x) when the borrowing of $40,000 is fully reimbursed.

Raisons: According to the law.