Search - convention
Results 271 - 280 of 1121 for convention
Decision summary
GE Energy Parts Inc. v. Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), ITA 621/2017, 21 December 2018 (High Court of Delhi) -- summary under Article 7
Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), ITA 621/2017, 21 December 2018 (High Court of Delhi)-- summary under Article 7 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 7 portion of profits attributable to marketing estimated at 26% Various non-resident General Electric companies employed non-resident employees (the “expatriates”) in an office in India to secure customers and negotiate contracts with them. ... Convention. Bhat J accepted a finding below that, in the absence of any evidence of the profits generated from the sales in India, they should be estimated at 10% of such sales, and that 26% of this profit was attributable to the operations carried out by the PE in India. ...
TCC (summary)
Martin v. The King, 2024 TCC 153 -- summary under Article 15
The King, 2024 TCC 153-- summary under Article 15 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 15 US baseball players were taxable only on their income generated in playing in Canada Regarding the taxation of US athletes with employment income earned 40% in Canada and 60% in the US, Gagnon J found that pursuant to the “basic” rules in ITA ss. 2(3) and 4(1)(b) it was necessary to determine their income earned in Canada through the exercise in part of their employment duties there, before applying the income computation rules in inter alia s. 6 and under the RCA rules including the exclusion for RCA contributions pursuant to s. 6(1)(a)(ii) in determining their taxable income earned in Canada. He further stated (at para. 72): The foregoing is also consistent with the Canada-United States Convention, which provides that Canada can only tax salary, wages, remuneration derived by a resident of the United States for employment services provided in Canada, if the employment is exercised in Canada [citing Art. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
28 April 2010 External T.I. 2009-0347581E5 F - Frais de formation -- summary under Know-How and Training
Expense- Know-How and Training distinction between training and convention expenses/ luncheon seminar fees on case law generally are professional deductions When asked whether expenses for attending a convention, seminar, luncheon meeting or other meeting incurred by an individual in the course of operating a business or an immovable are deductible, CRA stated: Training costs are not deductible as current expenses and are considered to be capital expenditures under paragraph 18(1)(b) if the training course to which they relate provides a lasting benefit to the taxpayer. ... As stated in paragraph 9 of IT-357R2, a training course should be distinguished from a convention. ... In addition, a convention does not become a training course when some of its sessions take the form of workshops. ...
Decision summary
Commissioner of Taxation v. Resource Capital Fund III LP, [2014] FCAFC 37 (Fed. Ct. of Austr.) -- summary under Article 4
.)-- summary under Article 4 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 4 reverse hybrid partnership The appellant ("RCF") was a Caymans limited partnership, with more than 97% of its capital held by a diversified group of US residents, principally funds and institutions. ... Article 1 of the Australia-US Convention provided that the Convention applied only to persons (defined to include partnerships) who were residents of one or both of the Contracting States; and Article 4 provided that a person is a US resident if the person is a US corporation "or any other person…resident in the United States for purpose of its tax…. ...
FCA (summary)
Canada v. Alta Energy Luxembourg S.A.R.L., 2020 FCA 43, aff'd 2021 SCC 49 -- summary under Article 13
., 2020 FCA 43, aff'd 2021 SCC 49-- summary under Article 13 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 13 Treaty shopping was not an abuse A Blackstone LP and a U.S. shale company transferred their investment in a Canadian subsidiary (Alta Canada), that was to develop a shale formation in northern B.C., to a Luxembourg s.à r.l (Alta Luxembourg – which, in turn, they held through an Alberta partnership). ... Webb JA rejected the particular Crown arguments in this regard-- that the object, spirit and purpose of Art. 13(4) required that: Alta Luxembourg be an “investor” (he stated, at para. 52, that “There is nothing to suggest that the underlying rationale for the exemption is that it would only be available to a resident of Luxembourg who invests in the particular corporation ….”) there be a potential to realize income in Luxembourg, whereas here the gain was offset by variable interest payable by Alta Luxembourg to the Alberta partnership (he stated, at para. 62, “There is no basis to find that the rationale for the definition of ‘resident’ would suggest that any criteria other than the criteria included in the definition of resident in Article 4, should be used ….”) the exemption be accessed only by persons who have some commercial or economic ties to Luxembourg (he stated, at para. 65, that “There is no distinction in the Luxembourg Convention between residents with strong economic or commercial ties and those with weak or no commercial or economic ties.”) He concluded (at para. 80): I agree with … MIL … that the object, spirit and purpose of the relevant provisions of the Luxembourg Convention is reflected in the words as chosen by Canada and Luxembourg. ...
Decision summary
Aiken Industries Inc v Commissioner of Internal Revenues, (1971) 56 TC 925 -- summary under Article 11
Aiken Industries Inc v Commissioner of Internal Revenues, (1971) 56 TC 925-- summary under Article 11 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 11 treaty exemption did not apply to interest received which was required to be on-paid A US corporation ("MPI"), owned by a Bahamian company ("ECL"), issued a loan note to ECL for a total principal sum of $2,250,000 carrying interest at 4% pa. ... IX of the US-Honduras Income Tax Convention which provided that interest on notes "from sources within one of the contracting States received by a resident, corporation or other entity of the other contracting State... shall be exempt from tax by such former State". ... Consequently, the interest in question must be viewed as having been 'received by' an entity (ECL) which was not a 'corporation or other entity' of one of the contracting States involved herein, and we therefore hold that the interest in question was not exempt from taxation by the United States under article IX of the convention." ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
12 March 2003 External T.I. 2002-0176955 F - Retenu dividende français -- summary under Article 10
12 March 2003 External T.I. 2002-0176955 F- Retenu dividende français-- summary under Article 10 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 10 Canadian mutual fund trust or pension fund trust deemed to be the beneficial owner of dividends by Art. 29(7)(a) of the Canada-France Convention CCRA indicated, regarding whether a dividend paid by a French corporation to a Canadian mutual fund trust or Canadian pension fund would be reduced pursuant to Art. 10(2)(c) of the Canada-France Convention, that assuming that such funds were resident in Canada as defined in Art. 4(1), any doubt as to whether they were the beneficial owners of the dividends would appear to be eliminated by Art. 29(7)(a) of the Convention. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
26 September 2014 External T.I. 2014-0531441E5 - Unfunded LTD plan payment to non-resident employee -- summary under Article 18
Convention A Canadian resident employee, after qualifying for benefits under the unfunded long term disability plan ("LTD Plan") of the Canadian resident employer, becomes a resident of the U.S. ... While the LTD plan payments would be taxable as income from employment for purposes of the Act, such income would be considered as being pension income for the purposes of applying the provisions of the Convention. ... Consequently, one must refer to the provisions of Article XVIII of the Convention rather than those of Article XV (Income from Employment)…. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
11 July 2006 External T.I. 2006-0182451E5 F - Indemnité versée par un syndicat -- summary under Paragraph 3(a)
11 July 2006 External T.I. 2006-0182451E5 F- Indemnité versée par un syndicat-- summary under Paragraph 3(a) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 3- Paragraph 3(a) payments by union to members to attend union conventions on their days off not taxable In order to encourage members to participate in union activities on their day off, the union compensates them during their attendance at union councils or conventions where matters such as working conditions, training, pressure tactics if necessary, and the general administration of the union are discussed. CRA stated: [W]here the member who attended the conventions is not employed by the union and the member does not carry on a business in the course of which the member receives those amounts, the amounts the member receives as compensation for attending union councils or conventions on their days off would not be derived from a source of income and would not be taxable. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
31 January 2006 External T.I. 2005-0151041E5 F - Régimes de sécurité sociale étrangers -- summary under Article 29
31 January 2006 External T.I. 2005-0151041E5 F- Régimes de sécurité sociale étrangers-- summary under Article 29 Summary Under Tax Topics- Treaties- Income Tax Conventions- Article 29 plan recognized as a pension plan under Art. 29(5) of the Cda-France Convention cannot be an EBP In response to a query as to whether contributions made by an employer to certain French social security plans are considered taxable benefits to employees who are residents of Canada for a period not exceeding 5 years and an expressed view that such plans are employee benefit plans ("EBP") so that no amount is to be included in the employee's income as a benefit under s. 6(1)(a)(ii), CRA stated: [W]here a pension plan is recognized for the purposes of paragraph 5 of Article 29 of the [Canada-France] Convention, it is our view that it is not an EBP. ... The CRA summary further noted: The Tax Convention takes precedence over the application of the Act. ...