Search - consideration
Results 1291 - 1300 of 3075 for consideration
FCA (summary)
McKesson Canada Corporation v. Canada, 2014 FCA 290 -- summary under Rule 75
The motions judge can also refuse amendment if the moving party has been dilatory, or considerations of fairness or prejudice so warrant (para. 10). ...
Decision summary
Barrick Gold Corporation v. Goldcorp Inc., 2011 ONSC 1325 -- summary under Solicitor-Client Privilege
Campbell J. stated (at para. 4): The documents make clear the particular input of a relatively small number of non-lawyer individuals outside the companies, whose input was necessary and appropriate to the consideration, structuring, planning and implementation of very complex transactions in a very short timeframe. ...
TCC (summary)
Royal Bank of Canada v. The Queen, [2007] GSTC 122, 2007 TCC 281 -- summary under Supply
In finding that such payments by RBC were the consideration for a taxable supply by CAIL of Points, Hershfield J stated (at para. 28): Everything CAIL did from being involved in establishing the terms of the credit facility to advertising the program was to promote the use of the card by the issuance of Points and that is what it was paid for – the issuance of Points. ...
TCC (summary)
McMullen v. The Queen, 2007 DTC 286, 2007 TCC 16 -- summary under Subsection 245(3)
The Queen, 2007 DTC 286, 2007 TCC 16-- summary under Subsection 245(3) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 245- Subsection 245(3) The taxpayer and an unrelated individual ("DeBruyn") accomplished a split-up of the business of a corporation ("DEL") of which they were equal common shareholders by transactions under which (i) DeBruyn converted his (Class A) common shares into Class B common shares, (ii) the taxpayer sold his Class A common shares of DEL to a newly-incorporated holding company for DeBruyn's wife ("114") for a purchase price of $150,000, (iii) DEL issued a promissory note to 114 in satisfaction of a $150,000 dividend declared by it on the Class A shares, (iv) 114 as signed the promissory note to the taxpayer in satisfaction of the purchase price for the Class A shares, (v) the taxpayer transferred the promissory note owing to him by DEL to a holding company ("HHCI"), and HHCI purchased assets of the Kingston branch of the business of DEL in consideration for satisfaction of the promissory note. ...
TCC (summary)
McMullen v. The Queen, 2007 DTC 286, 2007 TCC 16 -- summary under Subsection 245(4)
The Queen, 2007 DTC 286, 2007 TCC 16-- summary under Subsection 245(4) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 245- Subsection 245(4) The taxpayer and an unrelated individual ("DeBruyn") accomplished a split-up of the business of a corporation ("DEL") of which they were equal common shareholders by transactions under which (i) DeBruyn converted his (Class A) common shares into Class B common shares, (ii) the taxpayer sold his Class A common shares of DEL to a newly-incorporated holding company for DeBruyn's wife ("114") for a purchase price of $150,000, (iii) DEL issued a promissory note to 114 in satisfaction of a $150,000 dividend declared by it on the Class A shares, (iv) 114 as signed the promissory note to the taxpayer in satisfaction of the purchase price for the Class A shares, (v) the taxpayer transferred the promissory note owing to him by DEL to a holding company ("HHCI"), and HHCI purchased assets of the Kingston branch of the business of DEL in consideration for satisfaction of the promissory note. ...
TCC (summary)
McMullen v. The Queen, 2007 DTC 286, 2007 TCC 16 -- summary under Paragraph 251(1)(c)
The Queen, 2007 DTC 286, 2007 TCC 16-- summary under Paragraph 251(1)(c) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 251- Subsection 251(1)- Paragraph 251(1)(c) mutual benefit and same advisors insufficient to establish non-arm's length in structured sale transaction The taxpayer and an unrelated individual ("DeBruyn") accomplished a split-up of the business of a corporation ("DEL") of which they were equal common shareholders by transactions under which (i) DeBruyn converted his (Class A) common shares into Class B common shares, (ii) the taxpayer sold his Class A common shares of DEL to a newly-incorporated holding company for DeBruyn's wife ("114") for a purchase price of $150,000, (iii) DEL issued a promissory note to 114 in satisfaction of a $150,000 dividend declared by it on the Class A shares, (iv) 114 assigned the promissory note to the taxpayer in satisfaction of the purchase price for the Class A shares, (v) the taxpayer transferred the promissory note owing to him by DEL to a holding company ("HHCI"), and HHCI purchased assets of the Kingston branch of the business of DEL in consideration for satisfaction of the promissory note. ...
TCC (summary)
McMullen v. The Queen, 2007 DTC 286, 2007 TCC 16 -- summary under Subsection 84(2)
The Queen, 2007 DTC 286, 2007 TCC 16-- summary under Subsection 84(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 84- Subsection 84(2) The taxpayer and an unrelated individual ("DeBruyn") accomplished a split-up of the business of a corporation ("DEL") of which they were equal common shareholders by transactions under which (i) DeBruyn converted his (Class A) common shares into Class B common shares, (ii) the taxpayer sold his Class A common shares of DEL to a newly-incorporated holding company for DeBruyn's wife ("114") for a purchase price of $150,000, (iii) DEL issued a promissory note to 114 in satisfaction of a $150,000 dividend declared by it on the Class A shares, (iv) 114 assigned the promissory note to the taxpayer in satisfaction of the purchase price for the Class A shares, (v) the taxpayer transferred the promissory note owing to him by DEL to a holding company ("HHCI"), and HHCI purchased assets of the Kingston branch of the business of DEL in consideration for satisfaction of the promissory note. ...
TCC (summary)
McMullen v. The Queen, 2007 DTC 286, 2007 TCC 16 -- summary under Subsection 84.1(1)
The Queen, 2007 DTC 286, 2007 TCC 16-- summary under Subsection 84.1(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 84.1- Subsection 84.1(1) arm's length: negotiation based on self-interest The taxpayer and an unrelated individual ("DeBruyn") accomplished a split-up of the business of a corporation ("DEL") of which they were equal common shareholders by transactions under which (i) DeBruyn converted his (Class A) common shares into Class B common shares, (ii) the taxpayer sold his Class A common shares of DEL to a newly-incorporated holding company for DeBruyn's wife ("114") for a purchase price of $150,000, (iii) DEL issued a promissory note to 114 in satisfaction of a $150,000 dividend declared by it on the Class A shares, (iv) 114 as signed the promissory note to the taxpayer in satisfaction of the purchase price for the Class A shares, (v) the taxpayer transferred the promissory note owing to him by DEL to a holding company ("HHCI"), and HHCI purchased assets of the Kingston branch of the business of DEL in consideration for satisfaction of the promissory note. ...
FCA (summary)
Wolf v. Canada, 2002 DTC 6853, 2002 FCA 96 -- summary under Article 14
In finding that the taxpayer was deriving his remuneration from a contract for services notwithstanding that he worked for various projects at Canadair for a five-year period, the court accepted evidence that "the Appellant in consideration for a higher pay gave up many of the benefits which usually accrue to an employee including job security" (p. 6871- per Noël J.A.) and stated (p. 6870- per Décary J.A.): "When the hiring person wants to have no liability towards a worker other than the price of work and when the terms of the contract and his performance reflect those intentions, the contract should generally be characterized as a contract for services. ...
TCC (summary)
Charania v. The Queen, 2015 DTC 1103 [at at 614], 2015 TCC 80 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Effective Date
The Queen, 2015 DTC 1103 [at at 614], 2015 TCC 80 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Effective Date Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Effective Date consideration for transfer to shareholder adjusted without price adjustment clause An individual shareholder of a corporation ("B&N") thought that he was the beneficial owner of his home, but everyone else, including his accountants (and ultimately the Tax Court) considered that it was beneficially owned by B&N. ...