Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
Results 471 - 480 of 78916 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
Conference summary
6 October 2017 APFF Roundtable Q. 1, 2017-0708971C6 F - Inactive Corporations & subs. 162(7) ITA -- summary under Subsection 162(7)
6 October 2017 APFF Roundtable Q. 1, 2017-0708971C6 F- Inactive Corporations & subs. 162(7) ITA-- summary under Subsection 162(7) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 162- Subsection 162(7) no penalty imposed where failure to file a nil T2 return At the 2016 APFF Conference, CRA indicated that an inactive corporation must file an income tax return, but could file a letter explaining the non-filing, and that a penalty would not be automatically imposed. ... After noting that such filing was required by s. 150(1)(a)(i)(A), CRA stated: … Exida.com … stated that the general penalty in subsection 162(7) was applicable … where a person fails to comply with an obligation imposed on the person … unless another provision of the Income Tax Act provides for a penalty for such default. … However … the CRA [considers] that since this decision is based on a rather narrow interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions, the penalty under subsection 162(7) will generally not be imposed on resident corporations that failed to file their tax returns where they either had no taxable income or had incurred a loss for the year. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary
29 September 2020 External T.I. 2018-0757501E5 F - Crédit pour intérêts sur les prêts étudiants -- summary under Payment & Receipt
29 September 2020 External T.I. 2018-0757501E5 F- Crédit pour intérêts sur les prêts étudiants-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt capitalization of interest on a novation under Quebec law would constitute its payment A Quebec post-secondary student loan program provided for an initial 12-month “full exemption period” (in which the Quebec government paid the interest charged on the loan by the lender) and a subsequent six-month “partial exemption period” (during which the student borrower was required to pay interest on the loan balance). ... In addressing whether such capitalized interest qualified as being “paid” under a “loan made” under the Quebec financial assistance program so as to generate a credit under s. 118.62, CRA stated: By virtue of the Civil Code of Quebec, there can be payment where there is a handing over of money [(“tradition d’argent”)] between the debtor and the creditor or where there is novation by change of debt. … The mere addition of accrued interest to the principal amount of an original debt is generally not sufficient in itself to constitute a payment of such interest. If … the addition of interest to the principal … qualifies as a novation … the amount of interest will be considered paid when the novation occurs and will be eligible for the credit by virtue of section 118.62, if all the conditions set out in that section are otherwise satisfied. ...
Decision summary
Cussens & Ors v Brosnan, ECLI:EU:C:2017:881:Case C-251/16, [2017] BVC 61 -- summary under Subsection 274(4)
The Court stated (at paras 53, 60- 61): …[T]he case-law stemming from the judgment in Halifax does not require it to be established that the accrual of a tax advantage is the only objective of the transactions at issue. … In order to determine the substance and real significance of the leases at issue in the main proceedings, the referring court may, in particular, take account of the purely artificial nature of those transactions and the links of a legal, economic and/or personal nature between the operators at issue …. Such aspects are capable of demonstrating that the accrual of a tax advantage constitutes the essential aim pursued, notwithstanding the possible existence, in addition, of economic objectives …. …[T]he leases … had no commercial reality and were entered into … with the aim of reducing the VAT liability on the sales of immovable property … which they envisaged carrying out subsequently. ...
News of Note post
14 February 2022- 11:01pm Lussier – Court of Quebec finds no taxable benefit in an insurance company employee attending a conference for insurance brokers in Cancun Email this Content The taxpayer, was designated by his employer (“BMO,” an insurance company) to attend a one-week conference for insurance brokers and financial advisors whom one of BMO’s managing general agents had identified as top “performers.” ... In reversing the ARQ assessment to include 62.5% of the cost of the trip in the taxpayer’s income as a taxable benefit, Pilon JCQ stated: The recreational activities were an opportunity to create or maintain relationships with advisors and brokers. … … [T]he ARQ's … approach is somewhat penalizing and unfair to Mr. ... His employer did not give him the choice to participate in a trip, on which he went alone, and where he was expected to work and develop business, which he did, both during business hours and beyond. … [T]he ARQ's position stems either from a misunderstanding of what constitutes the steps required for business development where there is a legitimate growth objective, or from a desire to dictate to a business what its business model should be and how to achieve it. ...
News of Note post
The documentary evidence … does not give any indication that Mr. Chad … intended, in conducting the FX Activities, to achieve a profit/loss amount great enough to offset the $240,000 fee, which was a significant expense …. Thus … the intention of Mr. Chad … in implementing the Trades, was not to earn a profit …. ... The King, 2024 TCC 142 under s. 3(1) – business, and General Concepts- Sham. ...
News of Note post
Leggatt LJ stated: Counsel for Mr Jimenez … relied on a distinction … adopted … [by Rossiter CJ] in Oroville Reman & Reload … between documents of notice that merely involve the supply of information with no threat of penalties in the event of non-compliance and documents involving a compulsory process or containing a command. ... Such a measure does not involve the performance of any official act within the territory of another state – as would, for example, sending an officer of Revenue and Customs to enter the person's business premises in a foreign state and inspect business documents that are on the premises …. [T]he imposition of a civil penalty … for failure to comply with such a taxpayer notice would [not] involve an exercise of enforcement jurisdiction … provided that no steps are taken to seek to enforce the penalty in a foreign state. ...
21 June 2016- 11:22pm National Exhibition Centre – European Court of Justice finds that a fee for arranging for credit card payments for tickets was not exempt from VAT Email this Content The owner of a British exhibition centre (“NEC”) sold tickets on behalf of third parties holding events at the centre. ... Summaries of HMRC v National Exhibition Centre Ltd., [2016] BVC 19 under ETA – s. 123(1) – supply, s. 123(1) – financial service – para. ...
Article Summary
Jim Samuel, Byron Beswick, "Selected Issues in Transactions Involving Debt", 2019 Conference Report (Canadian Tax Foundation), 18:1 – 27 -- summary under Subsection 18(9.1)
[Footnote 65 See, for example, paragraphs 1.22 and 1.38 of … S4-F2-C1 … 2012-0436771E5 … and … 9325325 ….] ... Alternatively, if the intermediary is considered to be in the business of lending money, consideration could be given to whether the penalty paid might be deductible, under section 9 …. [I]t might be possible for the intermediary to avoid the payment and receipt of the prepayment penalty by assigning its debt receivable to the ultimate lender in satisfaction of the intermediary’s debt to the ultimate lender …. ...
24 June 2014- 11:13am Henco – Tax Court of Canada finds that compensation received for a destroyed business was completely tax-free Email this Content The Ontario government capitulated to Six Nations protesters, who occupied the subdivision property of the taxpayer (Henco), by passing a by-law prohibiting any use of the property (thereby rendering it valueless and (per C. ... The Queen, 2014 DTC 1161 [at 3528], 2014 TCC 192 under s. 9 – compensation payments, s. 12(1)(x), s. 14(5) – cumulative eligible capital, s. 23, General Concepts – fair market value – land, and General Concepts – evidence. ...
Decision summary
Canada (Attorney-General) v. Brogan Family Trust, 2014 ONSC 6354 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
Brogan Family Trust, 2014 ONSC 6354-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission no obligation to notify Crown if tax liability which was relieved has not been assessed The respondent family trust obtained a rectification order, to permit trust distributions to minor grandchildren beneficiaries, on 26 November 2010, which was shortly after a sale of a business by the trust. ... In dismissing this motion, Ray J stated (at para. 13): I am not persuaded that… CCRA [sic] was affected by the order of McLean, J. … [After citing Canada v. ... Richter & Associates, [2000] OJ No. 2073 (Ont SC) aff'd [2001] OJ No. 1087 (Ont CA)]. ...