Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

Patricia & Daniel Blais O/A Satronics Satellites v The Queen, 2010 TCC 361, 2010 DTC 1271 [at 3904] (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Paragraph 212(1)(d) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 212- Subsection 212(1)- Paragraph 212(1)(d) payments to access satellite network were not rent or royalty The taxpayers sold individual customers access to the satellite network of an American firm ("NPS"). ... Saint John Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. ([1980] C.T.C. 352 (F.C.A.)) for the proposition that a "rent" connotes a grant of property that lasts for a fixed or determinable term, reverting thereafter to the grantor. ...

Customs & Excise Commissioners, [2001] BTC 5083 (HL)-- summary under Supply Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 123- Subsection 123(1)- Supply Fees which the Appellant received from credit cardholders were found to be consideration for a single supply of insurance services. After quoting the statement in Customs & Excise Commissioners v. Madgett, [1998] BTC 5440 that "a service must be regarded as ancillary to a principal service if it does not constitute for customers an aim in itself, but a means of better enjoying the principal service applied", Lord Slynn found (at p. 5090) that: "If one asks what is the essential feature of the scheme or its dominant purpose, perhaps why objectively people are likely to want to join it, I have no doubt it is to obtain a provision of insurance cover against loss arising from the misuse of credit cards or other documents. ...

The Queen, 2019 TCC 65 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Scientific Research & Experimental Development Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 248- Subsection 248(1)- Scientific Research & Experimental Development development of custom software qualified as SR&ED The taxpayer, which was an engineering firm specializing in developing public transit related technology, engaged in a project to develop its web‑based system using algorithms and GPS data to provide accurate real‑time data for predicting the arrival time of public transit buses. In finding that the taxpayer satisfied the five-factor test in Northwest Hydraulic Smith J stated (at paras 19, 21, 22, 25, 27, 28): [T]he objectives which the Appellants sought to achieve were sufficiently uncertain during the subject years. … [T]he Appellant’s Project was much more than “quality control or routine testing (…)” excluded by paragraph (f) of the Act, and … there was a “technological risk or uncertainty”. ... I … find that Appellant applied the scientific method and that its activities were structured to remove a technological uncertainty through the formulation and testing of its hypothesis. … [P]aragraph (d) of the definition of SRED includes “work undertaken for the purpose of achieving technological advancement for the purpose of creating new, or improving existing, materials, devices, products or processes, including incremental improvements thereto”. ...

R & S Industries Inc. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 75-- summary under Subsection 97(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 97- Subsection 97(2) taxpayer is not bound by the statement of boot set out in its s. 97(2) election form The taxpayer (“R & S”) transferred its business to a limited partnership, with a joint s. 97(2) election being made. The Minister reassessed R & S to include substantial amounts in its income as a result of the transfer. A request by R & S and the partnership to file an amended election was denied by the Minister and the Federal Court denied their application for judicial review of this decision. ...

K & D Logging Ltd. v. The King, 2023 TCC 23-- summary under Subsection 20(21) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 20- Subsection 20(21) a s. 20(21) deduction cannot offset previously-recognized s. 17 income The taxpayer (K & D), which along with three other lenders, advanced funds in 1996 to a Uruguay farming corporation (Interan) of which the taxpayer was a 44% shareholder. ... On a CRA audit in 2009, a copy of the loan agreement was obtained by K & D from Uruguay, and it was determined that the loan was non-interest-bearing. K & D now argued that its deduction of an amount equal to the amounts it had previously recognized as interest income was authorized under s. 20(21). ...

Hancock & Anor v Revenue and Customs, [2019] UKSC 24-- summary under Redundancy/reading in words Summary Under Tax Topics- Statutory Interpretation- Redundancy/reading in words phrase read out of provision to give effect to intent The taxpayers relied on a literal interpretation of provisions to rely on proposition that it had avoided tax on a capital gain on the sale of their domestic private company for foreign-currency denominated loan notes through a partial conversion of some of the loan notes into qualifying corporate bonds (“QCBs”) and with the QCBs and the unconverted loan notes then being converted into one series of secured discounted loan notes (“SLNs”), with such notes then being sold on an exempt basis. ... However, she then stated (at paras. 21, 23-24, 26): [T]he appellants’ interpretation result would be inexplicable in terms of the policy expressed in these provisions. … Floyd and Lewison LJJ [below] did not give any meaning to the words “or include” in section 116(1)(b), but as I see it this was appropriate because … it is clear that the intention of Parliament was that each security converted into a QCB should be viewed as a separate conversion …. ... This enables the court, when interpreting a statute, to adopt (my words) a strained interpretation in place of one which would be contrary to the clear intention of Parliament. … Nothing in this judgment detracts from the principle in Luke but in my judgment, it is unnecessary to consider its application in this case because … the construction of the relevant provisions is clear without resort to it. ...

R & S Industries Inc. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 75-- summary under Subsection 171(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 171- Subsection 171(1) Tax Court had jurisdiction to consider change to description of consideration in s. 97(2) election form R & S Industries was unsuccessful in a motion to have the Federal Court direct CRA to reconsider its decision to not permit R & S Industries to file an amended s. 97(2) election form so as to change the agreed amounts. R & S then appealed to the Tax Court with a view to convincing the Court that the allocation of consideration between partnership-interest and non-partnership interest consideration set out on the (T2059) election form did not reflect the actual agreed allocation. CRA viewed this as an attempted end run around R & S’s inability to amend its election, and sought to have the appeal dismissed on jurisdictional grounds. ...

Collins Family Trust v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 BCSC 1030, aff'd 2020 BCCA 196, rev'd 2022 SCC 26-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission Fairmont cast doubt on but did not overrule Pallen After noting that the applications before him for the rescission of transactions entailing reliance on an interpretation of s. 75(2) that was established by Sommerer to be incorrect – and that in Pallen “which concerned an almost identical set of facts … rescission was granted” (para. 3), Giaschi J stated (at para. 5): I agree with the submissions of the respondent that the decisions... in Fairmont and Jean Coutu have seriously undermined Pallen. ... [holding] that a tax plan similar to the ones before me (and therefore also similar to the plan in Pallen) constituted abusive tax avoidance and was subject to GAAR. … In Satoma the primary purpose was found by the trial judge to be to avoid payment of any tax…. ...

The Queen, 2010 TCC 467-- summary under Payment & Receipt Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Payment & Receipt set-off of debt constituted payment thereof The shareholder of a Canadian company (“Merchant 2000”) lent U.S. $650,000 to a wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary (“Merchant U.S.”) of Merchant 2000, and subsequently transferred that receivable to Merchant 2000 in exchange for a receivable from Merchant 2000 of $650,000. ... (See for example: Armstrong … 88 D.T.C. 1015 ….) ...

Canada (Attorney General), 2016 SCC 55, [2016] 2 S.C.R. 670-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission rectification must give effect to common intention at time The taxpayer (“PJC Canada”), a Quebec corporation, implemented a plan, to neutralize the effect of FX fluctuations on its investment in a U.S. subsidiary (“PJC USA”), that overlooked foreign accrual property income considerations – so that interest generated to PJC USA on a loan that it made back to PJC Canada was included in PJC Canada’s income. ... In the AES case, the mistake consisted of a miscalculation in the adjusted cost base (“ACB”) of the transferred shares ― the procedure agreed to by the parties required the issuance and delivery of a note for an amount precisely equal to the shares’ ACB. ... [T]here is a fundamental difference between a contract under which one of a party’s prestations ― necessary for obtaining the intended tax result ― is to issue and deliver a note in an objectively calculable amount equal to the ACB of transferred shares, and a contract under which there is no obligation addressing FAPI, and no prestations agreed on that would prevent its fiscal consequences. …. ...