Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

In addition … transactions of the type described above could … give rise to surplus stripping situations … which could also trigger the application of subsection 245(2). ...

DSI of Holdco 2 after reorg: (DSI of Holdco 2 prior to reorg ($10) + $72 DSI considered to have been received from Opco per 2 above) x net cost amount of assets considered retained by Holdco 2 ($37 per 3 above, plus the $20 cost of other assets, totaling $57) / (net cost amount of assets of Holdco 2 “prior to” [sic] reorg ($57) + net cost amount of assets considered to have been received from Opco ($100 cost of Property 1)) = 82 x 57/157 = $30. 5. DSI of Holdco 2 considered to be transferred to Holdco 1: $82 – $30 = $52. 6. ... DSI of Holdco 1 after reorg: DSI of Holdco 1 prior to reorg ($1,000) + amount considered to have been received from Holdco 1 ($52) = $1,052. ...

A under subsection 74.2(1) …. By virtue of paragraph 40(3.6)(b), the amount of the Denied Loss … could, however, be added to … the ACB, to Mr. B, of each of the common shares of the capital stock of Opco that is owned by him immediately following the disposition …. … [A subsequent] taxable capital gain or an allowable capital loss [realized by Mr. B] on the disposition of a common share … of Opco … would not be realized or sustained by Mr. ...

[B]y reason of the subsection 256(9) election, a deemed taxation year end occurs … at the time immediately before 18:00 …. The corporation must take into account the taxation consequences of the asset sale and the rollover transaction… that occurred … in the corporation’s taxation year that terminated immediately before the effective time of the acquisition of control. … Furthermore, given that the amalgamation occurs after all the January 18, 20X1 transactions, including the acquisition of control … at 18:00 hours, the second taxation year of the corporation terminates immediately before the amalgamation by virtue of paragraph 87(2)(a). … The corporation would therefore technically have two taxation years that would be deemed to end during January 18, 20X1. The second … would be very short. ...

CRA stated: It appears … that the sale of the shares of Holdco B and Holdco A by Holdco C takes place as part of the same series of transactions as the share redemptions …. While it might be reasonable to conclude that the deemed dividends … do not affect the fair market value of the Holdco A and Holdco B shares (and consequently any capital gain realized by Holdco C on its disposition of such shares), such dividends would reduce a portion of the capital gain that, but for such dividend, would have been realized on a disposition at fair market value of any shares (i.e., the shares of Realco and Opco). … … If the shares of Opco and Realco represent more than 10% of the value of Holdco A and Holdco B.. then … clause 55(3)(a)(iii)(B) and clause 55(3)(a)(iv)(B) will technically apply. …[P]aragraph 55(3)(a) is intended to provide an exemption from the application of subsection 55(2) for certain dividends received in the course of related-party transactions. … [S]ince the other direct or indirect shareholders of Holdco A are not related persons, and the transactions … include a sale of Holdco A shares as part of the same series as the deemed dividends … the application of subsection 55(2) is operating as intended. ...

The percentage of relevant Canadian property for TCPCo is 100% (equal to $2 M / $2 M x 100). … [T]he percentage of relevant Canadian property for AusCo is 0% (equal to $0 / $10 M x 100). ... The proportionate value approach as described in 2015-0624511I7 can be summarized as follows: the percentage of relevant Canadian property of a particular subsidiary entity should be multiplied by the FMV of the shares of that entity; and the product resulting from above is the prorated FMV of the shares of the particular subsidiary entity which represents the FMV of a relevant Canadian property asset indirectly held by the parent. … [T]his would result in BVCo having a percentage of relevant Canadian property of 67% = $1 M / $1.5 M. Since more than 50% of the FMV of BVCo’s shares is derived from real or immovable property situated in Canada, the shares of BVCo are TCP …. ...

In finding that the fees were not deductible under s. 8(1)(i)(i), CRA stated: IT-158R2, [para. 1(c) … states that professional status must be recognized by a Canadian, provincial or foreign statute. ... [T]he facts described … do not support the conclusion that those conditions are satisfied. ...

. … … [W]here the transaction is not commercially reasonable, the borrowed money does not meet the test in paragraph 20(1)(c) of being used for the purpose of earning income. ...

12 June 2009 External T.I. 2009-0316511E5 F- Charges sociales et autres retenues France-- summary under Non-Business-Income Tax Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 126- Subsection 126(7)- Non-Business-Income Tax social security contributions do not qualify as income taxes – but French "contribution sociale généralisée" and "contribution pour le remboursement de la dette sociale" so qualify Can the following deductions made by France from the salary of an individual who has been resident in Canada for less than 60 months qualify as a non-business income tax for s. 126 purposes: CSG ("contribution sociale généralisée" ["general social contribution"]) CRDS ("contribution pour le remboursement de la dette sociale " [contribution for the repayment of the social debt]) Sécurité sociale vieillesse [old age social security] (retirement) Pole emploi (similar, in your opinion, to Employment Insurance) Retraite complémentaire [supplementary pension] (according to you, mandatory)? CRA responded: By virtue of paragraph 1 of Article XV of the Convention, salaries, wages and other similar remuneration derived by a resident of a Contracting State in respect of an employment shall be taxable only in that State unless the employment is exercised in the other Contracting State. … If the employee performs employment in France while resident in Canada, France may tax the employee to the extent provided in Article XV of the Convention and Canada may allow a foreign tax credit for non-business income taxes paid by the employee to France. … 2002-0169607 states that the "contribution sociale généralisée" and the "contribution pour le remboursement de la dette sociale" qualify as a non-business income tax … since these contributions have the legal characteristics of a tax (levied without direct consideration) as opposed to social contributions which, in turn, confer on those who pay them a right to benefits. … [S]ocial security contributions generally do not qualify as income or profits taxes because they are not really taxes at all, within the judicially accepted meaning of that term. ... This exception, however, does not seem to apply in the situation presented …. ...

If this benefit is provided to the incorporated employee in the incorporated employee’s capacity as an employee … the cost of the benefit comprises the personal use portion of the automobile lease costs. Consequently, these expenses would be deductible in computing the income of the PSB corporation by virtue of subparagraph 18(1)(p)(ii) to the extent that such leasing costs would otherwise be deductible if the corporation's income were from a business other than a PSB. … If this benefit is provided to the incorporated employee in the incorporated employee’s capacity as a shareholder, the cost of the benefit is not deductible in computing the income of the PSB corporation … since it would not, if the corporation's income were from a business other than a PSB, be deductible in computing its income. ... Respecting CCA claims, CRA stated: [A] capital cost allowance amount is not the cost of a benefit …[and] is not deductible in computing the income of a PSB corporation under subparagraph 18(1)(p)(ii). … However … capital cost allowance may be deducted in computing the income of the PSB corporation by virtue of subparagraph 18(1)(p)(iii) where such an amount would otherwise have been deductible by virtue of paragraphs 8(1)(f) and 8(1)(j)(ii), having regard to subsections 8(4), 8(10) and 8(13) …. ...