Search - 哈尔滨到北京 公里数

Filter by Type:

Results 181 - 190 of 786 for 哈尔滨到北京 公里数
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

15 September 2000 Internal T.I. 2000-0038337 F - RETENUES A LA SOURCE-REMUNERATION -- summary under Remuneration

. It is not required that the services be rendered to the payer, either the directors of the corporation (the employer) or the administrator of the settlement fund. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

30 May 2019 Internal T.I. 2019-0806761I7 - Late filing of 88(1)(d) designation -- summary under Subparagraph 152(4)(b)(iii)

After quoting from Nassau Walnut to the effect that a late designation was acceptable where the situation does not raise the spectre of retroactive tax planning,” the Directorate stated: [I]f the CRA has the ability to reassess the Taxpayer’s Part I income tax return for year-end #1 pursuant to subparagraph 152(4)(b)(iii) with respect to its disposition of the US shares the Taxpayer’s late-filed designation request could be considered. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

5 December 2012 Internal T.I. 2012-0439301I7 F - Reassessment beyond the normal reassessment period -- summary under Section 96

Furthermore …., under civil and common law, a partnership is simply the relationship that exists between persons or partners who carry on a business in common for profit. ... We refer you to Klein [which] stated: …[T]he partnership itself does not have the capacity to be indebted. The debt of the partnership is owed by the partners …. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

23 June 2010 Internal T.I. 2010-0368161I7 F - 84.1 -- summary under Paragraph 84.1(2)(b)

23 June 2010 Internal T.I. 2010-0368161I7 F- 84.1-- summary under Paragraph 84.1(2)(b) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 84.1- Subsection 84.1(2)- Paragraph 84.1(2)(b) s. 84.1(2)(b) inapplicable to individual’s transfer of ½ of Opco to Holdco (owned by 3 unrelated individuals) for note and non-voting pref Three individuals (A, B, and C) each held 1/3 of the shares of Holdco, and Holdco and another individual, D, each held ½ of the shares of Opco. ... [Thereafter] the Purchaser is controlled by a group of 4 persons consisting of A, B, C and D (the Final Group). ... Consequently, the deeming provision in paragraph 84.1(2)(b) could not apply …. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

14 October 2011 Internal T.I. 2011-0410781I7 F - Repas fournis gratuitement -- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(a)

14 October 2011 Internal T.I. 2011-0410781I7 F- Repas fournis gratuitement-- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(a) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 6- Subsection 6(1)- Paragraph 6(1)(a) benefit from free meals delivered on-site Respecting a proposal that employees would receive a catered meal service during their shifts, CRA stated: [T]o the extent the provision of free meals primarily benefits the employees and not primarily their employer, the value of that benefit should be included in computing the income of those employees. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

20 January 2021 Internal T.I. 2019-0832211I7 - Cross-border Restricted Share Units -- summary under Subparagraph 115(1)(a)(i)

., $1,800 = $1,000 + $800). Neal Armstrong. Summary of 20 January 2021 Internal T.I. 2019-0832211I7 under s. 126(1). ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

30 May 2019 Internal T.I. 2019-0806761I7 - Late filing of 88(1)(d) designation -- summary under Paragraph 88(1)(d)

After quoting from Nassau Walnut to the effect that where the Minister changes the provision under which the taxpayer’s income is computed and the taxpayer then seeks a deduction under the new provision, that request does not raise the spectre of retroactive tax planning,” the Directorate then stated that here: [I]f the CRA has the ability to reassess the Taxpayer’s Part I income tax return for year-end #1 pursuant to subparagraph 152(4)(b)(iii) with respect to its disposition of the US shares the Taxpayer’s late-filed designation request could be considered. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

5 December 2012 Internal T.I. 2012-0439301I7 F - Reassessment beyond the normal reassessment period -- summary under Subparagraph 152(4)(b)(iii)

…Paragraph 96(1)(a)[‘s] presumption that a partnership is a separate person does not apply for the purposes of section 152.... Furthermore …., under civil and common law, a partnership is simply the relationship that exists between persons or partners who carry on a business in common for profit. ... The debt of the partnership is owed by the partners …. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

29 February 2024 Internal T.I. 2023-0987941I7 - Amendments to GAAR and Advance Income Tax Rulings -- summary under Subsection 84(2)

29 February 2024 Internal T.I. 2023-0987941I7- Amendments to GAAR and Advance Income Tax Rulings-- summary under Subsection 84(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 84- Subsection 84(2) CRA after the GAAR amendments will continue to rule on post-mortem pipelines complying with its published policies, but not on inter vivos surplus stripping by individuals Regarding the status of post-mortem pipeline transactions following the amended GAAR rule, the Directorate stated: The Directorate does not consider the use of a pipeline transaction as a means to preserve the capital gain arising on the death of a shareholder while limiting double taxation on the subsequent distribution of Opco’s assets to be a [GAAR] abuse …. ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

29 February 2024 Internal T.I. 2023-0987941I7 - Amendments to GAAR and Advance Income Tax Rulings -- summary under Subsection 245(4)

29 February 2024 Internal T.I. 2023-0987941I7- Amendments to GAAR and Advance Income Tax Rulings-- summary under Subsection 245(4) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 245- Subsection 245(4) CRA will continue to issue post-mortem pipeline rulings following the GAAR amendments, but will not rule on surplus stripping by individuals Regarding the status of post-mortem pipeline transactions following the amended GAAR rule, the Directorate stated: The Directorate does not consider the use of a pipeline transaction as a means to preserve the capital gain arising on the death of a shareholder while limiting double taxation on the subsequent distribution of Opco’s assets to be a [GAAR] abuse …. ...

Pages