Relief of poverty and charitable registration
Disclaimer
We do not guarantee the accuracy of this copy of the CRA website.
Scraped Page Content
Relief of poverty and charitable registration
Guidance
Reference number
CG-029
Issued
November 27, 2020 (Revised October 23, 2024)
General requirements for charitable registration
In addition to the requirements set out in this guidance, there are a number of other general requirements related to charitable registration. For more information, see Guidance CG-017, General requirements for charitable registration.
Guidance products can be updated. If you have comments or suggestions to improve the guidance, we would like to hear from you. To provide comments or obtain additional information, contact the Charities Directorate.
Summary
A purpose to relieve poverty is furthered by providing a charitable benefit that relieves poverty to a person experiencing poverty.
A person experiencing poverty does not have the means to acquire basic necessities of life and simple amenities that allow for a modest but adequate standard of living.
The following are examples of basic necessities of life and simple amenities in Canada:
- affordable housing
- internet access
- home appliances
- public transportation
A charity may need to apply selection criteria and processes to assess whether its beneficiaries are experiencing poverty. Deciding whether to apply such selection criteria and processes can depend on:
- the value of the charitable benefit
- the frequency at which that benefit is provided
- the location where that benefit is provided
- the charity’s operational circumstances
A charity can use any of the following selection criteria to assess whether a beneficiary is experiencing poverty:
- poverty indicators that have been introduced or used by government agencies operating in Canada for one of their social programs
- poverty indicators the charity itself has developed
For affordable housing provided in Canada, a charity can use provincial or municipal criteria that are consistent with Government of Canada funded affordable housing programs.
A purpose to prevent poverty is not charitable. However, many charitable activities have the effect of preventing poverty. Charitable activities that have the effect of preventing poverty can further a purpose that fits in one of following categories of charity:
- advancement of education
- advancement of religion
- other purposes beneficial to the community in a way the law regards as charitable
A beneficiary of a charitable purpose that advances education, advances religion or benefits the community does not have to be experiencing poverty.
On this page
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The experience of poverty
- 3. Charitable benefits that relieve poverty
- 4. The ways to prevent poverty
- 5. Eligible beneficiaries of a purpose to relieve poverty
- 6. Selecting charitable beneficiaries that are experiencing poverty
- 7. Charitable benefits that relieve poverty provided to non-charitable beneficiaries
- 8. Other considerations
- 9. Version history
- Footnotes
1. Introduction
1. This guidance explains how the CRA interprets the requirements an organization with a purpose to relieve poverty must meet to be eligible for registration as a charity.
2. The guidance provides general information only. All decisions about specific organizations are made individually, applying the Income Tax Act (Act) and the common law to the facts in each case.
2. The experience of poverty
3. A person experiencing poverty needs help acquiring basic necessities of life and simple amenities that allow for a modest but adequate standard of living.Footnote 1
4. The courts have not set a uniform measure of poverty.Footnote 2 Rather, a person may or may not experience poverty depending on environment and individual circumstances. For example, between countries, or within a country there may be wide variances in environmental and individual circumstances, such as:
- income
- wealth
- education
- health
- social opportunities
- economic opportunities
- the cost of basic necessities of life and simple amenities
- geographic location (between countries, or even within a country)
Such particular environmental and individual circumstances should be taken into considered when developing criteria and processes for determining whether a person is experiencing poverty.
3. Charitable benefits that relieve poverty
5. A purpose to relieve poverty is furthered by providing a charitable benefit that relieves poverty, to a person experiencing poverty.
6. A charitable benefit that relieves poverty is a basic necessity of lifeFootnote 3 and simple amenityFootnote 4 that allows for a modest but adequate standard of living, or promote social inclusion.
The following are examples of charitable benefits that relieve poverty:
- basic necessities of life:
- shelterFootnote 5
- clothing
- food
- personal hygiene items
- eyeglasses
- health care
- access to water and sanitation
- simple amenities:
- learning materials and school supplies
- computers and required software
- internet access
- furniture and appliances
- passes for public transportation
- necessary home repairs Footnote 6
- financial assistance in the form of microloans and individual development accounts
- budgeting assistance and financial planning services
- help preparing for employment
- funeral services
- child care services
- care services for other dependents (such as elderly, critically ill, or otherwise disadvantaged household members)
- clothing for employment
- children’s recreational activities and camps
- cell phones
- help completing government forms (for example, to get social assistance and other benefits)
- legal services
7. A charitable benefit that relieves poverty can:
- take many different forms
- vary greatly between countries, or within a country
- vary over time
The following is an example of a charitable benefit that relieves poverty that varied over time:
- providing access to the internet to help with job searches
In the past, this was not considered a charitable benefit that relieves poverty. At the time, most job opportunities were posted on bulletin boards. Job applications were completed by hand and mailed in. Today, most job opportunities are posted on the internet, and applications completed online.
8. A charitable benefit that provides more than what is needed to relieve poverty might result in incidental or non-incidental private benefit.Footnote 8 A charity may provide incidental private benefit, but it cannot provide non-incidental private benefit.
For more information, see Policy statement CPS-024, Guidelines for registering a charity: Meeting the public benefit test.
The following are examples where more than what is needed to relieve poverty is provided:
- helping a beneficiary participate in society by paying their membership cost to a private country club
Although this activity may promote the social inclusion of the beneficiary, the value of the benefit with is more than what is needed to relieve poverty.
- helping a beneficiary acquire and install new granite countertops
The previous countertops contributed to an unhealthy living environment. However, the nature of the upgrade is more than what is necessary to meet the beneficiary’s need for adequate housing.
- in a city where there is reliable and widely used public transportation, buying a vehicle for a beneficiary’s personal transportation to and from work
This is more than the identified need for transportation.
In each of these examples, non incidental private benefit is provided.
4. The ways to prevent poverty
9. Although a purpose to prevent poverty is not charitable,Footnote 9 many charitable activities have the effect of preventing poverty.
10. Charitable activities that have the effect of preventing poverty can further a charitable purpose that fits in one of the other three categories of charity:
- the advancement of education
- the advancement of religion
- other purposes beneficial to the community in a way the courts have recognized as charitable
A beneficiary of a charitable purpose that advances education, advances religion, or benefits the community does not have to be experiencing poverty.
The following are examples of a charitable activities that have the effect of preventing poverty:
- providing a scholarship to a student
A lack of education can limit a person’s earning opportunities and economic security. Education, especially higher education, tends to prevent poverty.
- providing free mobility devices, home modifications, and vehicle modifications to a person with physical disability
Having a physical disability can lead to the experience of poverty.Footnote 10
5. Eligible beneficiaries of a purpose to relieve poverty
11. An organization that relieves poverty must consider how:
12. An eligible beneficiary of a purpose to relieve poverty is a person that is experiencing poverty. Footnote 11
13. While the eligible benefit group does not have to be defined in a purpose, ideally it is defined by a term that clearly describes persons in need of poverty relief.
14. For more information, see Guidance CG-019, How to draft purposes for charitable registration.
The following are examples of terms or expressions that describe an eligible beneficiary group of persons in need of poverty relief:
- persons experiencing poverty
- needyFootnote 12
- refugeesFootnote 13
- poor
- of limited meansFootnote 14
- orphans
The following is an example of a term or expression that does not describe the eligible beneficiary group as persons in need of poverty relief:
- To relieve poverty by providing shelter and other basic necessities to immigrants.
The courts have found that the term immigrants does not define a group persons in need of poverty relief.
To define an eligible beneficiary group of poverty relief, the term immigrants should be further qualified to immigrants experiencing poverty.
5.1 The “poor relations” exception
15. The eligible beneficiary group of a purpose to relieve poverty can be subject to the “the poor relations” exception.Footnote 15 This exception allows members of the eligible beneficiary group to be connected by one of the following:
- family
- employment (current or former)
- membership in certain groups
16. To meet the poor relations exception the eligible beneficiary group cannot be restricted to named, or particular individuals. Indicators that the eligible beneficiary group meets the poor relations exception include:
- the fact that all members of the beneficiary group are not immediately known
- the benefit provided by furthering the purpose is ongoing
- the benefit is not limited to persons who are alive and known when the purpose takes effect
For more information, see Policy statement CPS-024, Guidelines for registering a charity: Meeting the public benefit test.
The following in an example of an eligible beneficiary group that meets the poor relations exception:
- To relieve poverty by reimbursing paying for groceries and utilities of current and former employees of XYZ Corporation who are experiencing poverty, and their descendants who are experiencing poverty.
The beneficiary group is not comprised of persons who are alive and known when the purpose takes effect.
The following in an example of an eligible beneficiary group that does not meets the poor relations exception:
- To relieve poverty by reimbursing the medical expenses for a rare disease that afflicts the employees of a particular.
The small business has only one employee. The wording of the purpose’s identifies the particular individual.
5.2 A restrictions must be relevant to furthering the charitable purpose, and not contrary to Canadian public policy
17. Any restrictions in the eligible beneficiary group must be relevant to furthering the charitable purpose, and not contrary to Canada’s public policy.
5.3 Benevolent funds
18. A charity can establish a benevolent fund to help persons that are experiencing poverty. A gift to a benevolent fund can only be subject to a general direction that the gifted property be used in a particular charitable program, not for the benefit of a named individuals. In addition, all decisions regarding the use of a donation, including which specific beneficiaries will be provided charitable benefits, must rest with the charity.
6. Selecting charitable beneficiaries that are experiencing poverty
19. A charity may need to apply selection criteria and processes to assess whether its beneficiaries are experiencing poverty. Deciding whether to apply such selection criteria and processes can depend on factors such as:
- the value of the charitable benefit that relieves poverty
- the frequency at which that benefit is provided
- the location where that benefit is provided
- the charity’s operational circumstances
These factors help assess the likelihood the charitable benefit provides only incidental private benefit. If the charity determines that the potential of providing non-incidental private benefit is negligible, it may not be necessary to apply selection criteria and processes.
The following is an example where it is not necessary to apply selection criteria and processes:
- A charity provides assistance to individuals with accessing and applying for tax credits, benefits, and deductions that are targeted to low-income families and individuals.
The charity decides to not apply selection criteria and processes. It has determined that persons not in need the benefits are unlikely to access them. The potential of providing non incidental private benefit is negligible.
The following is an example where it is necessary to apply selection criteria and processes:
- A charity pays the utility bills of beneficiaries experiencing poverty.
The charitable benefits provided are more than modest in value, especially if they are provided over longer periods of time.
As such, the selection criteria and processes could include mechanisms to ensure that potential beneficiaries continue to experience poverty.
20. To determine whether a beneficiary is experiencing poverty, a charity can use poverty indicators used by government agencies operating in Canada for one of their social programs. For example:
21. Alternatively, a charity can develop its own selection criteria for assessing whether a beneficiary is experiencing poverty.
22. To determine whether person or household is eligible for affordable housing in a particular community or area, a charity can use provincial, or municipal criteria that are consistent with Government of Canada funded affordable housing programs across Canada, such as:
- Quebec — core need income threshold
- British Columbia — housing income limits
- Alberta — income thresholds
- Toronto — rent-geared-to-income-housing
For a household requiring three-bedroom accommodation, the following are consistent with Government of Canada funded affordable housing programs across Canada:
Community or area | Year | Income threshold |
---|---|---|
Vancouver | 2023 | $86,000 |
Calgary | 2024 | $76,000 |
Whitecourt | 2023 | $52,000 |
Toronto | 2024 | $79,000 |
Montreal | 2024 | $56,000 |
Halifax | 2024 | $67,500 |
23. Applying selection criteria and processes can involve collecting and analysing the following information:
- employment income and status
- total household income (including pension, social assistance, child support, spousal support)
- number of dependents
- value of assets (for example, investments and registered retirement savings plans)
- medical expenses
- child care expenses
- commuting expenses to and from employment
24. Documenting the following is an important part of maintaining adequate books and records:Footnote 16
- the selection criteria used to select beneficiaries that are experiencing poverty
- how the charitable benefits are provided to beneficiaries that are experiencing poverty
7. Charitable benefits that relieve poverty provided to non-charitable beneficiaries
25. There are instances where providing a charitable benefit that relieves poverty to a non-charitable beneficiary is an incidental private benefit.
26. Providing charitable benefits that relieve poverty to non charitable beneficiaries must be shown to support, facilitate, or contribute to a charity’s ability to further a purpose to relieve poverty. In addition, providing the charitable benefit should be necessary, reasonable, and proportionate to the public benefit that results from furthering the purpose.
The following is as example where providing charitable benefits that relieve poverty to non charitable beneficiaries is incidental private benefit:
- providing school breakfast or lunch program
Including all students in the program, regardless of whether or not they are experiencing poverty, can avoid stigmatization, and foster an inclusive environment.
Providing charitable benefits to non-eligible beneficiaries is necessary, reasonable, and proportionate to the public benefit that results from furthering the purpose.
8. Other considerations
8.1 Operating in collaboration with a non-qualified donee (grantee or intermediary)
27. A charity that furthers its charitable purpose or conducts activities in collaboration with a non‑qualified donee (grantee or intermediary) should be aware of the following:
Grantee
- accountability requirements set out in Guidance CG-032, Registered charities making grants to non-qualified donees
Intermediary
- direction and control requirements set out in guidances:
8.2 Community economic development
28. A charity can further a purpose to relieve poverty in an area of social and economic deprivation.
For more information see Guidance CG-014, Community economic development activities and charitable registration.
8.3 Tax implications
29. A charity that provides financial assistance to beneficiaries may need to provide a T5007, Statement of Benefits slip to their beneficiaries. For more information, see Guide T5007, Return of Benefits.
9. Version history
Version number | Revision | Reason for revision | Issued |
---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
|
|
Revised October 23, 2024 |
1.0 |
|
|
November 27, 2020 |
Footnotes
- Footnote 1
-
See the following:
- Independent Schools Council v The Charity Commission for England and Wales 2012 Ch 214, 2011 UKUT 421 (TCC), at paragraph 40, per Warren J:
It is a well-established principle of charity law, as will be seen in our analysis of the cases, that “poor” does not mean destitute even in the context of a trust for the relief of poverty. Broadly speaking, and in the present context, a poor person is a person who cannot reasonably afford to meet a particular need by purchasing at the full cost price the service which it is the charity’s purpose to provide.
- Ballarat Trustees’ Executors and Agency Co v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 1950 80 CLR 350 [Ballarat], at page 355, per Kitto J:
I should say that a person is in necessitous circumstances if his financial resources are insufficient to enable him to obtain all that is necessary, not only for a bare existence, but for a modest standard of living in the Australian community.
- Inland Revenue Commissioners v Baddeley 1955 AC 572 (HL) [Baddeley], at page 585, per Viscount Simonds:
[. . .] relief connotes need of some sort, either need for a home or for the means to provide for some necessity or quasi-necessity [. . .]”
- Footnote 2
-
See the following:
- Credit Counselling Services of Atlantic Canada Inc v MNR 2016 FCA 193 [Credit Counselling], at paragraph 16, per Webb JA:
[16] [. . .] To satisfy the requirement that a purpose is for the relief of poverty, the person receiving the assistance must be a person who is then in poverty. Poverty is a relative term. Therefore, it is possible that in some situations providing assistance through counselling or by other means to individuals in serious financial trouble may be considered to be relieving poverty, even if the individuals are not then destitute [. . .]
- Re McFee 1929 OJ No 341 37 OWN 266, at paragraph 17, per Logie J:
Even “poverty” is a relative term; and, if the expression had been “poor aged women,” it would not have been necessary, for the purpose of a legal charity, to confine the gift to the destitute poor -- it may extend to comprise persons of moderate means.
- Trustees of the Mary Clark Home v Anderson 1904 2 KB 645, at page 655, per Channell J:
That seems to lead to the conclusion that the expression “poor person” in a trust for the benefit of poor persons does not mean the very poorest, the absolutely destitute; the word “poor” is more or less relative.
- Gardom 1914 1 Ch 662, 83 LJ Ch 681, at page 668, per Eve J:
It is true that ladies of limited means are not destitute, and that the expression “limited means” may vary in its signification according to the standard by which the means are measured [. . .] there are degrees of poverty less acute than abject poverty or destitution, but poverty nevertheless [. . .] the objects to be benefited by the bequest are ladies too poor to provide themselves with a temporary home without outside assistance.
- Footnote 3
-
See Baddeley, supra note 1.
- Footnote 4
-
See the following:
- Ballarat, supra note 1.
- A.Y.S.A. Amateur Youth Soccer Association v Canada (Canada Revenue Agency) 2007 3 SCR 217, 2007 SCC 42, at paragraph 42, per Rothstein J:
42 [. . .] The organization, in substance, must have as its main objective a purpose and activities that the common law will recognize as charitable. Examples of sporting activity that the government acknowledges would be charitable include therapeutic horseback riding for children with disabilities, or sports camps for children living in poverty. In these examples, the objectives are ones well established as charitable.
- Footnote 5
-
There are various ways that an organization can relieve poverty by providing housing to individuals who are experiencing poverty. There are also broader requirements that organizations need to be familiar with when providing housing, such as:
- Guidance CG-022, Housing and charitable registration
- to determine whether the organization is required to issue T5007 slips to beneficiaries, see Guide T5007 - Return of Benefits
- depending on where the charity is operating, various municipal and provincial regulations
- Footnote 6
-
If they include repairs to a rental unit, see Policy statement CPS-006, Registered charities making improvements to property leased from others.
- Footnote 7
-
For more information, see Guidance CG-014, Community economic development activities and charitable registration.
- Footnote 8
-
See Joseph Rowntree Memorial Trust Housing Association Ltd v Attorney-General 1983 Ch 159, 1983 1 All ER 288.
- Footnote 9
-
Credit Counselling, supra note 2, at para 19.
- Footnote 10
- Footnote 11
-
See the following:
- Credit Counselling, supra note 2.
- Footnote 12
-
See the following:
- Jones v T. Easton Co 1973 SCR 635 (SCC). Further, while “needy” is acceptable, “in need of financial assistance” is not.
- Re Gillespie 1965 VR 402 (S Ct of Victoria), at page 408, per Little J:
Then, what of the words “financial assistance”? It may be said with truth that all persons who are poor are in need of financial assistance. But the converse is not true that all persons in need of financial assistance are poor or poor in the relevant sense. A person may, for instance, by reason of some emergency be in need of financial assistance but at the same time it could not be said of him that his state was one of “poverty”. The language, accordingly, would embrace cases other than those of poverty, but it is equally clear that it would embrace cases of poverty and I think the dominant intention as revealed by the language was to relieve poverty.
- Footnote 13
-
See Canadian Centre for Torture Victims (Toronto) Inc. v Ontario (Regional Assessment Commissioner, Region No. 9) (1998), 36 OR (3d) 743, 53 OTC 389.
The organization was incorporated to care for persons who had been victims of torture. Its clients were impoverished, the vast majority being “convention refugees.”
In granting the application, the court held that the applicant clearly met the onus. Economic deprivation or need must be evident, either by the obvious destitution of the beneficiaries or by application of a means test. Refugees that do not have access to all their resources can be eligible beneficiaries of poverty relief.
- Footnote 14
-
See Gardom, supra note 2.
- Footnote 15
-
The courts have upheld charitable trusts for the benefit of the poor, such as “poor relations”, “poor employees” and “poor members.” In all other charitable categories, such a narrow class of beneficiaries would not meet the public benefit test. See the following:
- Re Scarisbrick’s Will Trusts, Cockshott v Public Trustee 1951 1 Ch 622(CA), at page 655, per Jenkins LJ:
[. . .] the true question in each case has really been whether the gift was for the relief of poverty among a class of persons, or rather [. . .] was merely a gift to individuals, albeit with relief of poverty amongst those individuals as the motive of the gift [. . .]
- Dingle v Turner and Others 1972 AC 601
- In re Cox / Baker v National Trust, 1952 CanLII 13 (SCC), [1953] 1 S.C.R. 94
- Re Segelman (deceased), 1995 3 All ER 676 (Ch D), at page 692, per Chadwick J:
The basis for disqualification as a charitable gift must be that the restricted nature of the class leads to the conclusion that the gift is really a gift to the individual members of the class.
- Footnote 16
-
A registered charity must keep adequate books and records and must allow the CRA to:
- verify revenues, including all charitable donations received
- verify that resources are spent on charitable programs
- verify that the charity’s purposes and activities continue to be charitable
Section 230(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act requires a registered charity to keep books and records containing “information in such form as will enable the Minister to determine whether there are any grounds for the revocation of its registration under this Act.”
Page details
- Date modified:
- 2024-12-11