Income Tax Severed Letters - 2025-01-29

Technical Interpretation - External

28 November 2024 External T.I. 2024-1026331E5 F - Section 87 of the Indian Act

Unedited CRA Tags
87 Loi sur les Indiens; 81(1)a) ITA
reserve residents generally can exempt their employment earnings by agreeing to perform over half of their duties from home

Principales Questions: Does section 87 of the Indian Act apply to an individual’s employment income in two situations? In each situation, the individual is an "Indian" as defined in section 2 of the Indian Act. The following additional questions are asked:
a. Would the answer be different if the individual worked 90 % of the time from his home located on a reserve?
b. Does the fact that the activities of the minister employing the individual may have an impact on the Canadian indigenous communities affect the analysis?
c. Would the taxation exemption apply if the individual did not live on a reserve, considering his functions as a government employee?

Position Adoptée: Situation 1: Question of fact, but based on Guideline 3, the taxation exemption in section 87 of the Indian Act may apply to the individual’s employment income, provided that a formal telework arrangement is in place.
Situation 2: Question of fact, but based on Guideline 3, the taxation exemption in section 87 of the Indian Act may apply to the individual’s employment income, provided that a formal telework arrangement is in place.
Additional questions:
a. Question of fact, but based on Guideline 3 and Guideline 1, the taxation exemption in section 87 of the Indian Act may apply to the individual’s employment income, provided that a formal telework arrangement is in place.
b. No.
c. No.

Raisons: Wording of the Indian Act; jurisprudence on section 87 of the Indian Act.

Conference

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 1, 2024-1038181C6 - Safe Income and Preferred Shares

safe income of preferred shares issued on a s. 85 share-for-share exchange matches the safe income of the exchanged shares, and subsequently participates based on its dividend rate

Principal Issues: Does the position set out in the Safe Income Paper regarding the allocation of safe income to preferred shares acquired as consideration for the transfer of property on a tax-deferred basis to the corporation apply where the preferred shares are acquired in exchange for common shares?

Position: No. The allocation of safe income to the preferred shares in such circumstances should follow the CRA’s long-standing position on the allocation of safe income to preferred shares acquired on a tax-deferred share exchange.

Reasons: The position set out in the Safe Income Paper is only applicable to, specifically, the transfer of property other than shares.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 2, 2024-1038191C6 - Subsection 55(2) and Intra-Corporate Dividends

Unedited CRA Tags
55(2) ; 55(2.1)
CRA continues to be prepared to issue rulings dealing with the s. 55(2.1)(b) purpose tests

Principal Issues: Whether the CRA can provide an update on the application of subsection 55(2) to ordinary course intra-group dividends.

Position: Our position remains the same and we encourage taxpayers to obtain additional comfort, if required, through requests for advance income tax rulings.

Reasons: The law and continuity in our publicly shared positions since 2015.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 3, 2024-1038151C6 - Notifiable Transactions

Unedited CRA Tags
237.4, 245(1), 18(6.1), 212(3.1), 212(3.6), 212(3.81), 212(3.9)
B2B reporting engaged where loan from immediate NR parent (funded in turn in part with debt from ultimate parent) bears reduced (10%) withholding
s. 212(3.1) generally inapplicable where immediate funder receives only common shares financing from ultimate funder

Principal Issues: Various questions regarding CRA's interpretation of the Designated Transactions in "NT 2023-05" (Back-to-back arrangements), including the meaning of "financing" for these purposes.

Position: See below.

Reasons: See below.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 4, 2024-1038161C6 - EIFEL and the Excluded Entity Exception

Unedited CRA Tags
18.2(1)(c)(i)
90% not applied as a strict threshold for determining “substantially all”
Words and Phrases
substantially all

Principal Issues: Based on the scenario submitted, whether B Co would meet the “all or substantially all” standard of carrying on its business in Canada for the purpose of meeting the definition of "excluded entity" in paragraph 18.2(1)(c).

Position: General comments provided; question of facts.

Reasons: Based on the limited hypothetical set of facts provided, it is not possible to conclusively determine whether B Co would meet that standard.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 5, 2024-1038171C6 - EIFEL and ATI Calculation where Taxpayer has Non-Capital Losses

Unedited CRA Tags
18.2, 18.21
not permitting taxable income to be negative in the ATI formula is producing anomalous results

Principal Issues: Can paragraph (b) of variable D of variable A of the definition of adjusted taxable income defined in subsection 18.2(1) be negative?

Position: No.

Reasons: Legislation.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 6, 2024-1038251C6 - EIFEL - Pre-Regime Election and Amalgamations and Liquidations

Unedited CRA Tags
The transitional rules introducing section 18.2 and 18.21 of the Act, 87(2.1)(a.1) and 88(1.11).
continuity treatment extends to the use of pre-regime capacity

Principal Issues: What is the effect of amalgamations and wind-ups on various balances referred to in the coming into force provisions ("excess capacity otherwise determined", "excess interest", "group net excess capacity", "net excess capacity") where an election has been made for the transitional rules to apply to eligible pre-regime group entities.

Position: Based on the policy objectives set out in the explanatory notes for the transition rules and the amendments to section 87 and 88 and the coming into force of the amendments it is reasonable to extend the application of paragraph 87(2.1)(a.1) and subsection 88(1.11) to the transitional amounts applicable in the pre-regime period notwithstanding these provisions do not explicitly refer to the terms used in the pre-regime transition rules.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 7, 2024-1038221C6 - Post-Mortem Pipeline Bump Planning

Unedited CRA Tags
88(1)(c)(vi)(B), 88(1)(d.2), 88(1)(d.3)
an 11% estate beneficiary becomes a specified shareholder of the deceased’s corp. concurrently with its deemed acquisition under ss. 88(1)(d.2) and (d.3)
estate beneficiary not considered to acquire 10% interest in estate company prior to deemed s. 88(1)(d.2) and (d.3) acquisition

Principal Issues: Whether a beneficiary of an estate would be considered to be a specified shareholder of a corporation before control of the corporation was last acquired by the Estate.

Position: No.

Reasons: We would apply paragraphs 88(1)(d.2) and (d.3) on the understanding that the deemed acquisition of control of the corporation by the Estate occurs concurrently with the acquisition of the shares of the corporation by the Estate.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 8, 2024-1038201C6 - Application of paragraph 55(2)(b)

Unedited CRA Tags
55(2)(b), subparagraph (j)(i) of "proceeds of disposition" definition in section 54
s. 55(2)(b) interpreted so as to avoid circularity

Principal Issues: Whether in the context of a deemed dividend arising under subsection 84(3), the provisions of paragraph 55(2)(b) and subparagraph (j)(i) of the "proceeds of disposition" definition in section 54 could be applied to result in two capital gains.

Position: No.

Reasons: There is only one possible capital gain/loss from the disposition of a share to which paragraph 55(2)(b) applies.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 9, 2024-1038271C6 - Regulation 105

Unedited CRA Tags
153(1)(g) and Regulation 105
Reg. 105 applies amounts paid to a non-resident for services rendered in Canada even where those services have been subcontracted to a Canadian resident

Principal Issues: In light of CRA's new position expressed in CRA document 2022-0943241E5, please clarify CRA's new position on the application of Regulation 105 in the hypothetical situation with respect to fees paid to a non-resident for services rendered in Canada.

Position: The fees paid by Canco to NRCo, to the extent such fees are in respect of services performed in Canada, are subject to withholding pursuant to paragraph 153(1)(g) of the Act and Regulation 105.

Reasons: Based on position expressed in CRA document 2022-0943241E5.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 10, 2024-1038231C6 - Intergenerational Business Transfers

Unedited CRA Tags
84.1(2)(e) ; 84.1(2.3) ; 84.1(2.31) ; 84.1(2.32)
the prohibition against multiple use of the intergenerational transfer rules does not apply to simultaneous transfers

Principal Issues: Whether simultaneous transfers to two purchaser corporations would cause either of them to fail to meet the requirements of paragraphs 84.1(2.31)(a) and 84.1(2.32)(a).

Position: Each of the simultaneous transfers, as the ones contemplated in the proposed scenario, would satisfy the condition in 84.1(2.31)(a) and 84.1(2.32)(a).

Reasons: The law.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 11, 2024-1038241C6 - Global Minimum Tax Act – Interpretation and Application of OECD Agreed Administrative Guidance

Unedited CRA Tags
GMTA 3(1); 17(6); 24
CRA will consult with Finance re potential amendments to catch up to OECD guidance in administering the GMTA
CRA will administer s. 17(6) to push down taxes paid by indirect owner of reverse hybrid CE on income of the CE allocated to it, to the CE

Principal Issues: In the case of a reverse hybrid that is fiscally transparent in relation to an indirect owner (an FT-CE), will the CRA administer the application of the GMTA based on the June 2024 Administrative Guidance?

Position: Yes, the CRA will administer the provisions of the GMTA to achieve what the June 2024 Administrative Guidance clarifies as the appropriate outcome - the income staying in the FT-CE and any covered taxes paid by the upper tier entity (i.e., the indirect owner in your specific example) on that income being pushed down to the FT-CE.

Reasons: The CRA is committed to administering the GMTA in accordance with Canadian law as enacted by Parliament. This includes the application of subsection 3(1), which is described in the Department of Finance’s Explanatory notes as intending “to ensure that the Act is interpreted, applied and administered in a manner consistent with the outcomes provided under the Model Rules, Commentary and Administrative Guidance (referred to in this note, collectively, as the “Pillar Two Rules”), including any future revisions or additions to the Pillar Two Rules”.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 12, 2024-1037751C6 - Property flipping rules and corporate property transfers

Unedited CRA Tags
12(12), 12(13), 12(14), 85(1), 87(1) 87(1)(a), 87(2)(a), 88(1)(a), 88(1)(a.1), 88(1)(a.3) 125(1), 125(7), 245(2)
s. 12(13)(b) has no continuity rules for common reorganization transactions

Principal Issues: Whether the Flipped Property Rules apply in various scenarios.

Position: General comments provided.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 13, 2024-1038261C6 - Standard Convertible Debentures and Part XIII Tax

Unedited CRA Tags
214(7), 212(3)
FMV excess on conversion of a convertible debenture is deemed interest under s. 214(7)
s. 214(7) excess received on the conversion of a standard convertible debenture generally is not participating interest

Principal Issues: 1. Whether there is an excess under subsection 214(7) on the conversion of standard convertible debentures issued by Canadian public entities (taxable Canadian corporations, trusts resident in Canada, Canadian partnerships) when the FMV of the common shares received exceeds the price paid for the convertible debentures. 2. Whether the deemed payment of interest on standard convertible debentures under subsection 214(7) that arises because of a transfer or assignment constitutes participating debt interest.

Position: 1. Yes. 2. No.

Reasons: 1. Wording of subsection 214(7), TCP analysis, 214(7) applicable from the perspective of the holders of standard convertible debentures. 2. Previous position.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 14, 2024-1037761C6 - Availability of the Small Business Deduction

Unedited CRA Tags
125(7), 129(4)
active business income includes income from property that (having regard to Ensite) is held principally for the purpose of producing active business income

Principal Issues: Whether income from a property that is “used or held principally for the purpose of gaining or producing income from an active business carried on by” a corporation is included in its income “for the year from an active business”.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The legislation.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 15, 2024-1030561C6 - The Foix decision and hybrid sales

Unedited CRA Tags
Subsection 84(2)
Foix overruled a more restrictive approach to s. 84(2) in some earlier cases (and restricts Geransky)

Principal Issues: Views of the CRA regarding the potential impact of the decision in Foix v. Canada (FCA).

Position: General comments provided.

Reasons: See below.

3 December 2024 CTF Roundtable Q. 16, 2024-1038281C6 - Indian Act Tax Exemption for Employment Income and Employees of a Limited Partnership

Unedited CRA Tags
81(1)(a)
a partly owned LP of a 1st Nations band did not generate significant economic benefits to the reserve, its Indian employees were not exempted on off-reserve income

Principal Issues: Can CRA comment regarding both scenarios whether the employment income earned off-reserve by LP’s employees, who are registered under the Indian Act and who live on a reserve, is exempt from tax under section 87 of the Indian Act?

Position: No.

Reasons: Based on our understanding of the connecting factors presented in the two hypothetical scenarios and absent the identification of any other connecting factors, the employment income earned off-reserve by the First Nations employees is not situated on a reserve, regardless of where the employees live and where the employer is resident.