Income Tax Severed Letters - 2019-09-25

Conference

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 1, 2019-0798621C6 - NRT ceasing to be deemed resident

Unedited CRA Tags
94(2)(g), 94(2)(t), 94(3)(a), 94(4)(e), 94(5)
a qualifying s. 94(2)(t) sale of Canadian shares effects an immediate commencement of a non-resident year

Principal Issues: Is the position outlined in CRA Document 2013-0509111E5 valid?

Position: The result is correct; however, there is an inaccurate statement.

Reasons: See below.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 2, 2019-0798491C6 - Alter ego trust and donations

Unedited CRA Tags
38(a.1)(i), 104(4), 104(6), 104(13.4), 107(2), 118.1(1)
payments made to registered charity beneficiaries of a trust can be charitable gifts if the payments made are in the discretion of the trustees

Principal Issues: Various questions regarding an alter ego trust and donations following the death of the settlor.

Position: Questions of fact and law. General comments provided.

Reasons: See below.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 3, 2019-0799901C6 - TOSI and Hours Worked

Unedited CRA Tags
120.4(1), 120.4(1.1)
husband and wife each contributing 5 hours per week to business could have an excluded business

Principal Issues: Can an individual meet regular, continuous and substantial basis test if they work less than the 20 hour per week minimum bright line test in 120(4)(1.1)?

Position: Yes (facts permitting).

Reasons: Individual is actively engaged in the activities of Opco's business based on the facts and circumstances and work performed.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 4, 2019-0799911C6 - TOSI & Meaning of Excluded Business

Unedited CRA Tags
120.4
spouse on achieving 20-hour threshold could receive large dividends as excluded amounts
an excluded amount can exceed arm’s length remuneration for the services rendered

Principal Issues: Whether dividend income earned by a spouse who works as a part-time receptionist in the business would be subject to TOSI.

Position: No.

Reasons: See below.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 5, 2019-0799961C6 - TOSI and Spouse Age 65+

Unedited CRA Tags
Paragraph 120.4(1.1)(c)
example of the flow-through of the s. 120.4(1.1)(c) excluded amount exclusion through a trust

Principal Issues: Application of Paragraph 120.4(1.1)(c) where the “excluded amount” to be relied on is the one for “excluded shares”.

Position: Paragraph 120.4(1.1)(c) may apply in appropriate circumstances.

Reasons: Wording of the provision.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 6, 2019-0799941C6 - TOSI tracing of attributes

Unedited CRA Tags
120.4(1), 120.4(1.1)
successive legatees can rely on the same activity-level of the original testator under s. 120.4(1.1)(b)(ii)
a subsequent bequest of Opco shares from the active mother converts previous bequest of shares from the inactive father into good shares for TOSI purposes

Principal Issues: 1. Whether the deeming rules provided in subsection 120.4(1.1) apply if Mr. A ("inactive" parent) subsequently dies and those shares he inherited from Mrs. A ("active" parent) are inherited from him, by his children. 2. Whether the children who inherit shares from an "active" parent and an "inactive" parent are entitled to the excluded business exemption in respect of all future dividends received from Opco.

Position: 1. Yes 2. No for the taxation year in which the children inherit the "inactive" parent's shares and, Yes, beginning in the taxation year in which the children inherit the "active" parent's shares.

Reasons: Based on technical requirements.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 7, 2019-0798321C6 - Income Author / Musician

royalty income from a music composing business is active business income
royalty income was incident to composing active business

Principal Issues: Question 7 of the 2019 Step Conference. 1. Does the CRA agree with the case of Roco Gagliese Productions Inc. v. The Queen 2018 TCC 136 where it was held that the royalty income was income from services because the person who derived the income was earning the income in the normal course of his business? and 2. If so, how does the decision apply to a mortgage lending business that earns interest income on a business of renting real estate?

Position: 1. We agree with the TCC decision. 2. If the principal purpose of a corporation's business is to derive income from property and none of the other exceptions apply then the income will be considered to be income from a specified investment business.

Reasons: Our previous position.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 8, 2019-0798481C6 - Contingency Fees WIP

Unedited CRA Tags
10(1), 10(4)(a), 10(5)
contingent fee WIP can have a greater than nil value “in certain circumstances”

Principal Issues: How should the value of a professional's work in progress be determined where the work is performed on a contingency basis?

Position: See response.

Reasons: Previous positions.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 9, 2019-0798631C6 - Estate immigrating to Canada

Unedited CRA Tags
2(3), 128.1(1)(a)(i), 150(1), 150(1.1), 248(1), 249(1), 250.1
a non-resident estate that becomes resident can then become a GRE

Principal Issues: 1. Can the Estate designate itself as a GRE when filing its first tax return under Part I of the Act? 2. Generally, what information would the Minister consider to be “acceptable” information, in lieu of the deceased being assigned a SIN, for purposes of paragraph (c) of the GRE definition in subsection 248(1) of the Act?

Position: 1. Likely yes. 2. Individual tax number or a temporary tax number.

Reasons: See below.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 10, 2019-0809651C6 - Non-resident Estate as GRE

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1) "graduated rate estate"
NR estate can provide a temporary tax number of deceased lacking a SIN

Principal Issues: 1. Does the requirement for a SIN or “such other information as is acceptable” in paragraph (c) of the definition of a GRE in subsection 248(1) preclude a non-resident individual’s estate from meeting the definition of a GRE? 2. What would the CRA consider “such other information as is acceptable” to meet the requirement in paragraph (c) of the definition of a GRE?

Position: 1. No 2. ITN or TTN is acceptable.

Reasons: 1. The requirement is not aimed at restricting the estate of a non-resident individual from being a GRE. 2. These unique identifiers allow the CRA's T3 Assessing section to track the GRE to the deceased individual.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 11, 2019-0805771C6 - Estate as Qualified Disability Trust

Unedited CRA Tags
122(3), 122(2), 104(6), 104(13), 104(24)
estate ceases to generate income when it is fully administered

Principal Issues: Can an estate be a qualified disability trust (QDT) indefinitely?

Position: Question of law; however, likely not.

Reasons: In the scenario provided the Will directs the executor to pay the residue of the estate to the beneficiary.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 12, 2019-0798301C6 - Attribution under 75(2)

Unedited CRA Tags
75(2), 150(1), 221, Regulation 204
Satoma has not changed the CRA view that trusts must report income that is attributed to the settlor under s. 75(2)
s. 75(2) attributed income must be reported by trust even though its net income is nil

Principal Issues: How should a T3 return be prepared when the property in the trust is subject to subsection 75(2)?

Position: A T3 Return must be filed reporting the income and issuing a T3 slip to the contributor reporting any attributed income.

Reasons: Prior positions.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 13, 2019-0798501C6 - TOSI and PBE

Unedited CRA Tags
104(13); 104(14); 104(19); 105(2); 120.4(1) and 120.4(2)
exclusion inapplicable to dividend income flowed through to a preferred beneficiary
no exclusion for dividend income flowed out to preferred beneficiary

Principal Issues: Does paragraph (c) of the "split income" definition in subsection 120.4(1) apply in regard to income allocated pursuant to a preferred beneficiary election?

Position: No. But subparagraph (a)(i) of the "split income" definition must be considered if there is a 104(19) designation.

Reasons: See below.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 14, 2019-0798511C6 - TOSI and PBE

Unedited CRA Tags
104(13); 104(14); 104(19); 105(2) and 120.4(1)
subjecting dividend income paid to a preferred beneficiary to TOSI accords with tax policy – but the designation can be readily avoided
designation can be avoided by including dividend in "other income" box

Principal Issues: 1) Can CRA explain its reasoning for its comments regarding subsection 104(19) in document 2018-0759521E5? 2) Will CRA grant relief for previous years in which a preferred beneficiary election was made?

Position: 1) Reasoning provided. 2) No relief will be granted.

Reasons: 1) See below. 2) see below.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 15, 2019-0798351C6 - CPP/EI Rulings

A CPP/EI status ruling can trigger a payroll audit

Principal Issues: Does CRA examine an employer's payroll remittance or GST/HST accounts after a CPP/EI Ruling is completed?

Position: General comments.

Reasons: A referral to examine the other accounts is sent in specific situations and solely to ensure compliance from the employer.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 16, 2019-0798461C6 - Passive Income

Unedited CRA Tags
125(5.1), 125(5.2)
recurring ordinary dividends can constitute a transfer of property sufficient to engage s. 125(5.2)

Principal Issues: Would the anti-avoidance rule in subsection 125(5.2) apply in a situation where Opco has established a pattern in the past of paying dividends equal to substantially all of its annual income to related but not associated Holdcos?

Position: Question of fact and will depend whether one of the reasons for Opco paying the dividends to the Holdcos can reasonably be considered to be to reduce the amount of the "adjusted aggregate investment income" of the associated group for the purposes of the "passive income reduction" rule in paragraph 125(5.1)(b).

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 17, 2019-0798711C6 - Part XVIII of the Act

Unedited CRA Tags
263
the IRS has not followed up re any FATCA information sent to it

Principal Issues: Can the CRA provide recent statistical data with respect to data that it is required to collect and transmit to the US IRS pursuant to part XVIII of the Act and the Inter-Governmental Agreement between the US and Canada ("IGA")?

Position: As of April 1, 2019, the CRA has sent over 700,000 records to the IRS under the IGA for the 2017 tax year. Apart from standard automated notifications to identify file and record level errors, no further information has been requested by the US in respect to this data.

7 June 2019 STEP Roundtable Q. 18, 2019-0809731C6 - Update re DTS

Principal Issues: Can the CRA provide an update on the status of the DTS pilot project?

Position: The DTS expanded nationally in January of 2019 to include all small and medium-sized income tax service providers across Canada. Based upon its success and reception by the tax service industry, the Government announced in Budget 2019 that it would provide ongoing funding to make the well-received DTS program permanent, improving service for the millions of Canadians who work with tax service providers each year.