Income Tax Severed Letters - 2014-03-19

Ruling

2013 Ruling 2013-0490391R3 F - Single-Wing Split-Up Butterfly

CRA Tags
55, 15(1)

Principales Questions: Whether the butterfly dividends are exempt from the application of subsection 55(2) by virtue of paragraph 55(3)(b)?

Position Adoptée: Yes, favourable rulings given.

Raisons: Complies with paragraph 55(3)(b) and previous CRA positions.

2013 Ruling 2012-0464841R3 - Distribution by a trust

CRA Tags
105(1), 75(2), 107(2), 246(1), 106(2), 56(2), 107(2.001), 86(1), 107(1)
addition of capital encroachment right

Principal Issues: 1. Whether the variation will, in and of itself, result in a resettlement of the trust or disposition (as defined in subsection 248(1)) of the existing common shares of corporation held by the trust or any other assets held by the trust? 2. Whether the variation will, in and of itself, result in a disposition of the income or capital interest of any beneficiary of the trust for purposes of subsections 106(2) and 107(1) and the definition of "disposition" in subsection 248(1)? 3. Whether, subject to subsection 107(2.001), subsection 107(2) will apply to the trust distribution of the common shares of the corporation to the beneficiaries of the trust, in partial satisfaction of their capital interests in the trust? 4. Whether subsections 56(2), 105(1), and 246(1) will not be applicable solely as a consequence of the proposed transactions? 5. Whether section 245 will be applicable to re-determine the tax consequences of the proposed transactions? 6. Whether section 86 will apply to certain proposed transactions so that those transactions will occur on a tax-deferred basis? 7. Whether the deemed disposition of the Class B preferred shares will result in any tax liability to the trust?

Position: 1. No, 2. No, 3. Yes, 4. No, 5. No, 6. No, 7. No ruling given

Reasons: 1. and 2. - Variation, in and of itself, is limited in scope to adding administrative and discretionary powers only. 3 to 6 - Consistent with rulings previously issued. 7. - We do not rule on FMV.

Ministerial Correspondence

4 March 2014 Ministerial Correspondence 2014-0519971M4 - medical expense tax credit

CRA Tags
118.2(2)(l)

Principal Issues: Does the cost of a trained diabetic alert dog for an individual with diabetes qualify as an eligible medical expense for the purposes of the medical expense tax credit?

Position: Budget 2014 announced that paragraph 118.2(2)(l) will be extended to apply to individuals with severe diabetes. The proposed measure will apply to expenses made after 2013.

Reasons: Budget 2014

28 February 2014 Ministerial Correspondence 2014-0519481M4 - Province of Residence

Principal Issues: 1. General information on filing and the taxpayer's province of residence.

Position: 1. No position taken.

Reasons: 1. An individual's province of residence on December 31 is a question of fact.

Technical Interpretation - External

4 March 2014 External T.I. 2014-0519051E5 - Meals and Entertainment Expenses

CRA Tags
6(1)(a), 6(1)(b), 67.1(2), 67.1(1)

Principal Issues: Whether the exceptions in paragraphs 67.1(2)(a) and (d) would be met?

Position: General comments but it appears that the exception in paragraph 67.1(2)(a) would not apply; however, the exception in paragraph 67.1(2)(d) might apply.

Reasons: The law.

4 March 2014 External T.I. 2013-0491981E5 F - Soins à un conjoint inapte

CRA Tags
9, 6(1)(a), 5
personal care amounts received by a committee may be non-taxable

Principales Questions: Quelle est la nature et le traitement fiscal des sommes reçues par un contribuable (mandataire) dans le cadre d'un mandat en cas d'inaptitude accordé par son époux? What is the nature and the tax treatment of amounts received by a taxpayer (mandatary) pursuant to a mandate given by her spouse in anticipation of his incapacity?

Position Adoptée: Question de fait. Possiblement un revenu d'entreprise ou d'emploi. Toutefois, il est possible que la somme ne soit pas imposable si les faits en l'espèce sont analogues à ceux dans les décisions Pellerin et Maurice de la Cour canadienne de l'impôt. / Question of fact. Possibly income from a business or income from employment. However, it is possible that the amounts be not taxable if the facts in this situation are analogous to the ones in the Pellerin and Maurice decisions of the Tax Court of Canada.

Raisons: Position antérieure.

3 March 2014 External T.I. 2014-0519071E5 F - Période de détention de 24 mois pour AAPE

CRA Tags
110.6(14)(f)(i)
24-month test met where s. 85(2) and (3) reorganization before sale

Principales Questions: Est-ce que les actions de Nouco remplissent la condition de la période de détention de 24 mois aux fins de la déduction du gain en capital pour les AAPE? / Do shares of Newco meet the 24 months holding period criteria for the capital gain deduction on QSBCS?

Position Adoptée: Oui car elles ont été émises en contrepartie d'autres actions conformément au sous-alinéa 110.6(14)f)(i) / Yes as they were issued in exchange for other shares, in accordance with subparagraph 110.6(14)f)(i).

Raisons: La loi / The Law

17 February 2014 External T.I. 2014-0517491E5 F - Bien de remplacement - usages multiples

CRA Tags
248(1), 44(5), 44(5)(b), 44(1)
rental property not a replacement property for mixed use property

Principales Questions: Les règles sur les biens de remplacement s'appliquent-elles en l'espèce? Are the replacement property rules applicable in the situation described below?

Position Adoptée: Non/ No.

Raisons: Puisque l'ancien bien était utilisé, en partie du moins, pour tirer un revenu d'entreprise, il est nécessaire que le nouveau bien soit également utilisé à cette fin (par le contribuable ou une personne qui lui est liée). Since the former property was used to generate, in part, income from a business, it is necessary that the new property be used to generate business income by the taxpayer or a related person.

30 January 2014 External T.I. 2013-0515761E5 F - Dividend received

CRA Tags
12(1)(j), 121, 82(1)
book entries merely record and do not establish that a dividend was paid
book entries are ancillary and do not establish receipt

Principales Questions: Tax consequences for an individual shareholder relating to the declaration of a taxable dividend by a taxable Canadian corporation and the recording of such dividend through journal entries.

Position Adoptée: Previous positions.

Raisons: Dividends are taxed at the individual shareholder level when they are received. In itself, a journal entry would not represent an amount paid and received for the declaration of the dividend. Accounting documents or entries serve only to reflect transactions. It is the reality of the facts that determines the true nature and substance of transactions.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

14 February 2014 Internal T.I. 2013-0490891I7 - Revocable Living Trust

CRA Tags
104(4)
revocable living trust formed on initial settlement date
revocable living trust formed on initial settlement date

Principal Issues: Whether our 1995 administrative policy statement associated with our 1988 to 1993 opinions on revocable living trust applied in the current case

Position: No

Reasons: See document