Principal Issues: Where Parent issues treasury shares to Subsidiary's employees in satisfaction of RSU awards (stock options) granted by Parent to the employees, and Subsidiary reimburses Parent for the FMV of the shares, pursuant to a reimbursement agreement, will a benefit be conferred by Subsidiary on Parent under subsections 246(1) and 15(1) of the Act? Will the reimbursement payment be subject to Part XIII of the Act? Will section 245 of the Act apply?
Position: No. No. No.
Reasons: Where Subsidiary reimburses Parent, pursuant to a reimbursement agreement, in respect of RSUs (stock options) awarded to Subsidiary employees and any increase in the intrinsic value of the RSUs (stock options), after the date of the reimbursement agreement, Subsidiary has a legal obligation to make the reimbursement payment and no benefit will be considered conferred on Parent. In general, a reimbursement payment made by a Canadian Subsidiary to a U.S. Parent, in respect of benefits received by the Canadian Subsidiary's employees under the U.S. Parent's stock option plan, would not constitute a payment that would be subject to Part XIII of the Act. The reimbursement payment made by the Canadian Subsidiary would not appear to result in a "tax benefit", as paragraph 7(3)(b) of the Act will deny the Canadian Subsidiary a deduction in respect of the payment.