Search - consideration
Results 8221 - 8230 of 29007 for consideration
TCC
Brian E Turner v. Minister of National Revenue, [1984] CTC 3026, 84 DTC 1828
The agreement between the appellant and Mr Towers called for payment to the appellant as consideration for his services of $5,000 on the closing in February, 1973 and a further $5,000 thirty days later. ...
FCTD
Her Majesty the Queen v. Barbara D Sills (Formerly Barbara D La Brash), [1983] CTC 48, 83 DTC 5070
I heard evidence and submissions of counsel at Edmonton on May 28, 1982 and held the matter under consideration. ...
T Rev B decision
Donald Stanley Derbecker v. Minister of National Revenue, [1983] CTC 2120, 83 DTC 115
On December 1, 1976, the taxpayer sold 1,715 shares of Heritage House Limited (the “shares”) to his daughter, Pamela Derbecker, in consideration for a promissory note in the amount of $96,948.95 which was payable to the taxpayer on demand after December 31, 1976. ...
T Rev B decision
Yvon Massy v. Minister of National Revenue, [1983] CTC 2500, 83 DTC 471
In reassessing the appellant for his taxation year 1978 the Minister of National Revenue relied, inter alia, on the following facts: (a) during the taxation years at issue, the appellant was a salaried employee of the Centre de Services Sociaux Laurentides-Lanaudière Inc, in the capacity of social worker; (b) the Centre is a social agency, a part of the social affairs network of the province of Quebec with permanent offices in various localities in the region, at Joliette, Ste-Thérèse, St-Jêrome, Ste-Agathe and so on; the said Centre has various activities, such as youth protection, home care for the elderly, infirm, handicapped and so on; (c) labour relations between the Centre and its salaried employees are governed by a collective agreement; (d) during the taxation years at issue, the Centre asked the appellant to use his automobile, and in consideration thereof the Centre guaranteed the appellant an annual minimum mileage, and if this minimum mileage was not covered, he would be paid an additional amount for use of the automobile; (e) to further clarify subparagraph (d), during the taxation year 1978 the relevant paragraphs of the collective agreement in effect read as follows: ARTICLE 24 — TRAVEL ALLOWANCES 24.01 When an employee at the request of the employer must carry out his duties away from the establishment, he shall be deemed to be at work throughout the time used in travelling. ...
T Rev B decision
Kenneth W Ridley v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2074, 82 DTC 1089
While it was not referenced at the hearing, I would note for consideration (but without additional comment) section 204.1 of the Act which reads: (1) Where, at the end of any month after May, 1976, an individual has an excess amount for a year in respect of registered retirement savings plans, he shall, in respect of that month, pay a tax under this Part equal to 1% of that portion of the aggregate of all such excess amounts that has not been paid by such plans to the individual before the end of that month. ...
T Rev B decision
D H Rowley v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2245, 82 DTC 1226
This situation may be one in which special consideration should be given for a rebate or remission, but that is beyond the powers of the Board. ...
T Rev B decision
E F Anthony Merchant v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2742, 82 DTC 1764
The decision to work at home was not based entirely on considerations of convenience. ...
T Rev B decision
Precision Small Parts LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2799, 82 DTC 1811
In answer to the appellant’s argument of ambiguity- hence a broader interpretation should be applied in favour of the taxpayer — counsel for the respondent simply stated that the section being considered was an exempting provision which precluded any consideration of ambiguity in favour of the taxpayer. ...
T Rev B decision
Muriel Anne McGuire v. Minister of National Revenue, [1982] CTC 2830, 82 DTC 1813
Supreme Court of Canada decision Jack Cewe Ltd v Jorgenson, [1980] CTC 314; 80 DTC 6233, in which the Supreme Court gave serious consideration to whether or not, in that matter, the damages at issue flowed out of the contract of employment. ...
T Rev B decision
Sivaco Wire & Nail Company, Industrial Fasteners LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1981] CTC 2081, 81 DTC 140
Counsel for the Minister suggested that consideration should be given to the totality of the materials used in the building, including the inner core of steel in the structure itself, and to the fact that the outside covering was made of steel, not iron—as iron is understood in the natural state. ...