Search - 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Results 41 - 50 of 275 for 2002年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
Technical Interpretation - External summary
18 March 2003 External T.I. 2003-0002915 F - Subsections 40(3.3) & 40(3.4) -- summary under Subsection 40(3.4)
18 March 2003 External T.I. 2003-0002915 F- Subsections 40(3.3) & 40(3.4)-- summary under Subsection 40(3.4) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 40- Subsection 40(3.4) taxpayer can designate order of disposition On December 16, 2002, Holdco sold 200 of its 1,000 common shares of a public corporation to an unaffiliated person $1,500, realizing a capital loss of $500, and less than 10 days after December 16, 2002, Holdco acquired 200 new common shares of the public corporation at a cost of $1,500. ...
FCTD (summary)
T & S First Choice Renovations Limited v. Canada Revenue Agency, 2012 DTC 5152 [at at 7377], 2012 FC 1146 -- summary under Subsection 220(3.1)
T & S First Choice Renovations Limited v. Canada Revenue Agency, 2012 DTC 5152 [at at 7377], 2012 FC 1146-- summary under Subsection 220(3.1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 220- Subsection 220(3.1) The taxpayer appealed the Minister's decision to deny relief of interest on corporate tax, payroll deductions, and GST accounts. ... The corporation had allowed penalties to accrue on its accounts since 2002. ...
TCC (summary)
Bourgault v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 6 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
The Queen, 2019 TCC 6-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission a rectification judgment was “justifiably obtained” and, therefore, followed for tax purposes On April 15, 2002, the taxpayer signed an agreement for the purchase of shares of a real estate corporation (“Quatre Saisons”) that stated that the purchase price was to be satisfied by the payment to the vendor (“Placeval,” a corporation owned by a Mr. ... Before granting the taxpayer’s appeal from the assessment, Favreau J stated (at paras. 55, 59-60, 62): [T]he judgment of the Superior Court is not binding on the respondent as neither the Attorney General of Canada nor the Minister was involved in the application. … Although the judgment of the Superior Court is not binding on the respondent and is not res judicata, the conduct of the parties, both before and after the concluding of the transaction, clearly demonstrates their true intention to purchase and sell the shares of Quatre Saisons for nominal consideration and not for consideration based on the future sales of lots. ... The financial statements of Quatre Saisons for its fiscal years ending on March 31 of 2003, 2004 and 2005, also reflected the commissions paid in the cost of the sales of the lots. … [I]t is evident that the agreement, as reduced to writing, contained drafting errors of material importance …. ...
TCC (summary)
Oroville Reman & Reload Inc. v. Canada, 2016 TCC 75 -- summary under Territorial Limits
From 2002 to 2006, the U.S. s collected approximately US $5.4 billion in duties in relation to imports of Canadian softwood lumber products into the United States. Although a few – including Oroville – were U.S. companies, the vast majority of the importers of record who paid the duties were Canadian lumber producers. ... This can only be so if the application of the SLPECA to the Appellant is justified on the ground of territoriality. … Translated to the case at bar, the question is whether there is a "real and substantial link" between Canada and the activities giving rise Canada's claim for tax. ...
Decision summary
Birch Hill Equity Partners Management Inc. v Rogers Communications Inc., 2015 ONSC 7189 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission
., 2015 ONSC 7189-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission stock option deduction was peripheral to the larger share sale transaction The general partner of an Ontario limited partnership (“Atria”) granted stock options on its Class C shares to 10 Atria executives. ... Respecting the second point, he stated (at para. 42) before quoting Performance Industries, 2002 SCC 19, at para. 31 that “rectification in cases of unilateral mistake is possible, but the requirements for invoking this doctrine are intentionally much, much narrower and thus more demanding.” ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
8 October 2004 Internal T.I. 2004-0093371I7 F - Crédit d'impôt à l'investissement & impôt minimum -- summary under Subparagraph 127(5)(a)(ii)
8 October 2004 Internal T.I. 2004-0093371I7 F- Crédit d'impôt à l'investissement & impôt minimum-- summary under Subparagraph 127(5)(a)(ii) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 127- Subsection 127(5)- Paragraph 127(5)(a)- Subparagraph 127(5)(a)(ii) carryback of ITCs from year where the taxpayer was subject to minimum tax After noting that where minimum tax applies in a particular taxation year (here, 2003), the deductible amount of investment tax credit in respect of property acquired in that year is limited under s. 127(5)(b) to the amount by which the tax otherwise payable under Part I for the year (2003) exceeds the minimum tax applicable to the individual for that year, the Directorate went on to note that the unused investment tax credit balance be carried back to previous years (2000 to 2002) if the investment tax credit amount is higher than this excess: for purposes of the carryback to such prior years, s. 127(5)(a)(ii) takes into account the balance that was not deductible in the particular taxation year (2003). ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary
16 November 2015 Internal T.I. 2015-0598491I7 - 91(5) & FAPI included per “old” 94(1)(c)(i)(C) -- summary under Subsection 91(5)
16 November 2015 Internal T.I. 2015-0598491I7- 91(5) & FAPI included per “old” 94(1)(c)(i)(C)-- summary under Subsection 91(5) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 91- Subsection 91(5) upward ACB adjustment to the CFA occurring as a result of recognized FAPI under the old s. 94(1) rules represented basis that could be distributed while the trust was subject to the new s. 94(3) trust rules A non-resident discretionary trust (“NRT”) owned all the shares of CFA. Amounts in respect of CFA’s foreign accrual property income had to be included in NRT’s 2002, 2004 and 2006 taxable income by virtue of “old” s. 94(1)(c)(i)(C) (“FAPI-Inclusions”). ...
FCA (summary)
Teleglobe Canada Inc. v. R., 2002 DTC 7517, 2002 FCA 408 -- summary under Cumulative Eligible Capital
., 2002 DTC 7517, 2002 FCA 408-- summary under Cumulative Eligible Capital Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 14- Subsection 14(5)- Cumulative Eligible Capital cost of assets purchased with treasury shares was the agreed purchase price being the shares’ stated capital In connection with a privatization transaction and at a time that it was still owned by the federal Crown, the taxpayer purchased assets for a stipulated purchase price that was less than the price at which an arm's length purchaser had committed (pursuant to the same agreement under which the asset sale occurred) to purchase the common shares of the taxpayer. ...
FCA (summary)
Teleglobe Canada Inc. v. R., 2002 DTC 7517, 2002 FCA 408 -- summary under Adjusted Cost Base
., 2002 DTC 7517, 2002 FCA 408-- summary under Adjusted Cost Base Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 54- Adjusted Cost Base cost of assets acquired was the stated capital of the shares issued therefor, being the agreed transaction value In connection with a privatization transaction and at a time that it was still owned by the federal Crown, the taxpayer purchased assets for a stipulated purchase price that was less than the price at which an arm's length purchaser had committed (pursuant to the same agreement under which the asset sale occurred) to purchase the common shares of the taxpayer. ...
FCA (summary)
Canada v. Citibank Canada, 2002 DTC 6876, 2002 FCA 128 -- summary under Ordinary Meaning
Citibank Canada, 2002 DTC 6876, 2002 FCA 128-- summary under Ordinary Meaning Summary Under Tax Topics- Statutory Interpretation- Ordinary Meaning phrase directed at sophisticated transctions should be given its commercial meaning The legislative history of the definition of term preferred share in s. 248(1) indicated that the provision applied to a specific and sophisticated segment of taxpayers, with the result that it was appropriate that the phrase "guarantee, security or similar indemnity or covenant" be interpreted in accordance with its more technical meaning derived from the laws that applied to commerce in general and public business companies in particular, rather than its ordinary dictionary meaning. Malone J.A. also stated (at p. 6881): "... as indicated in Bon-Secours, once ambiguity becomes an issue, the legislative provision should be given a strict or liberal interpretation depending on the purpose underlying the provision. ...