Search - 枣庄市市中区 智博公考 地址 电话

Filter by Type:

Results 241 - 250 of 1670 for 枣庄市市中区 智博公考 地址 电话
Technical Interpretation - External summary

23 December 2003 External T.I. 2003-0014655 F - article 125.5 -- summary under Paragraph (d)

In rejecting an argument that Bco was not excluded from being an "eligible production corporation" by virtue of being a corporation indirectly controlled by Her Majesty in right of a province, because Her Majesty in right of a province is not a taxpayer for the purposes of the Act and does not have taxable income, CCRA stated: Braithwaite, 70 DTC 6001 stated: “Her Majesty is just as capable of being a "person taxable" as is an ordinary person as is evidenced by the fact that there are various federal statutes that do impose direct and indirect taxes on Her Majesty in one way or another.” We believe that Her Majesty in right of a province is a person and a taxpayer for the purposes of the Act. Furthermore, we are of the view that the exemption from tax under Part I of the Act referred to in paragraph (d) of the definition of "eligible production corporation" refers not only to persons whose taxable income is exempt because of section 149 but also to persons whose taxable income is exempt because of, inter alia, the immunity from tax enjoyed by certain persons such as Her Majesty in right of a province. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

10 February 2022 External T.I. 2021-0912581E5 F - Borrowing to make interest-free loans -- summary under Subparagraph 20(1)(c)(i)

Regarding a bank loan received by Dco whose proceeds are used by it to make an interest-free loan to the LPs, CRA stated: [T]he comments in S3-F6-C1, [paras. 1.54, 1.55] could apply in the partnership context …. ... Regarding the bank loan instead being made to Aco which uses the proceeds to directly or indirectly make an interest-free loan to the LPs (e.g., making such loan to Dco which, in turn, makes interest-free loans to the LPs, or to Bco, with back-to-back interest free loans made all the way down the stack), CRA stated: [I]n light of Canadian Helicopters, the fact that the taxpayer's income is derived from dividends from stacked corporations should not be a factor that prevents a taxpayer from relying on the direct use of borrowed funds exception to make an interest-free loan. [I]t would be necessary to assess whether the interest-free loans made by Aco to the LP, Bco or Dco affect Aco's ability to earn income. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

30 November 2004 External T.I. 2004-0090181E5 F - Assurance maladie grave -- summary under Paragraph 18(1)(h)

Furthermore, where the corporation is the beneficiary of a policy acquired to finance a share purchase/redemption under a shareholders' agreement the premiums are not made or incurred for the purpose of earning business income as required by paragraph 18(1)(a) or paragraph 18(1)(h). ... If a critical illness policy were used as collateral for a corporate loan, the premiums would also be non-deductible …. Antoine Guertin …. Premiums paid by the corporation for the rider to the policy allowing it to obtain a premium refund amount if the shareholder does not have one of the covered illnesses or medical conditions after 10 years are not deductible on the basis of the application of paragraphs 18(1)(a) and 18(1)(h). ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

2 August 2005 External T.I. 2005-0112871E5 F - Cotisation professionnelle -- summary under Subparagraph 8(1)(i)(i)

In finding that the fees were not deductible under s. 8(1)(i)(i), CRA stated: IT-158R2, [para. 1(c) states that professional status must be recognized by a Canadian, provincial or foreign statute. ... [T]he facts described do not support the conclusion that those conditions are satisfied. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

25 May 2001 External T.I. 2001-0067415 F - CONSOLIDATION DE PERTES -- summary under Paragraph 20(1)(c)

. [W]here the transaction is not commercially reasonable, the borrowed money does not meet the test in paragraph 20(1)(c) of being used for the purpose of earning income. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

12 June 2009 External T.I. 2009-0316511E5 F - Charges sociales et autres retenues France -- summary under Non-Business-Income Tax

12 June 2009 External T.I. 2009-0316511E5 F- Charges sociales et autres retenues France-- summary under Non-Business-Income Tax Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 126- Subsection 126(7)- Non-Business-Income Tax social security contributions do not qualify as income taxes but French "contribution sociale généralisée" and "contribution pour le remboursement de la dette sociale" so qualify Can the following deductions made by France from the salary of an individual who has been resident in Canada for less than 60 months qualify as a non-business income tax for s. 126 purposes: CSG ("contribution sociale généralisée" ["general social contribution"]) CRDS ("contribution pour le remboursement de la dette sociale " [contribution for the repayment of the social debt]) Sécurité sociale vieillesse [old age social security] (retirement) Pole emploi (similar, in your opinion, to Employment Insurance) Retraite complémentaire [supplementary pension] (according to you, mandatory)? CRA responded: By virtue of paragraph 1 of Article XV of the Convention, salaries, wages and other similar remuneration derived by a resident of a Contracting State in respect of an employment shall be taxable only in that State unless the employment is exercised in the other Contracting State. If the employee performs employment in France while resident in Canada, France may tax the employee to the extent provided in Article XV of the Convention and Canada may allow a foreign tax credit for non-business income taxes paid by the employee to France. 2002-0169607 states that the "contribution sociale généralisée" and the "contribution pour le remboursement de la dette sociale" qualify as a non-business income tax since these contributions have the legal characteristics of a tax (levied without direct consideration) as opposed to social contributions which, in turn, confer on those who pay them a right to benefits. [S]ocial security contributions generally do not qualify as income or profits taxes because they are not really taxes at all, within the judicially accepted meaning of that term. ... This exception, however, does not seem to apply in the situation presented …. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

9 March 2020 External T.I. 2013-0490301E5 F - Société exploitant une EPSP -- summary under Subparagraph 18(1)(p)(ii)

If this benefit is provided to the incorporated employee in the incorporated employee’s capacity as an employee the cost of the benefit comprises the personal use portion of the automobile lease costs. Consequently, these expenses would be deductible in computing the income of the PSB corporation by virtue of subparagraph 18(1)(p)(ii) to the extent that such leasing costs would otherwise be deductible if the corporation's income were from a business other than a PSB. If this benefit is provided to the incorporated employee in the incorporated employee’s capacity as a shareholder, the cost of the benefit is not deductible in computing the income of the PSB corporation since it would not, if the corporation's income were from a business other than a PSB, be deductible in computing its income. ... Respecting CCA claims, CRA stated: [A] capital cost allowance amount is not the cost of a benefit …[and] is not deductible in computing the income of a PSB corporation under subparagraph 18(1)(p)(ii). However capital cost allowance may be deducted in computing the income of the PSB corporation by virtue of subparagraph 18(1)(p)(iii) where such an amount would otherwise have been deductible by virtue of paragraphs 8(1)(f) and 8(1)(j)(ii), having regard to subsections 8(4), 8(10) and 8(13) …. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

10 June 2003 External T.I. 2003-0017065 F - Disp. of Property owned on Dec 31, 71 -- summary under Subsection 85(5)

X's capital cost ($200,000) and the amount by which that cost exceeded the proceeds of disposition ($50,000) would be deemed to be CCA deducted in preceding taxation years, whereas “the capital cost to the corporation of the building for the purposes of all other provisions of the Act would, in accordance with our position in paragraph 10(a) of IT-217R be considered to be Mr. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

25 May 2001 External T.I. 2001-0067415 F - CONSOLIDATION DE PERTES -- summary under Paragraph 111(1)(a)

. [W]here the transaction is not commercially reasonable, the borrowed money does not meet the test in paragraph 20(1)(c) of being used for the purpose of earning income. [T]he fact that Profitco's income is "foreign accrual property income" will not, in and of itself, change the Agency's position. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

14 September 1996 External T.I. 9629825 - PHSP CVRGE FOR SAME SEX LIFE PRTNER OF AN EMPLOYEE SECTION 6(1)(a) -- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(a)

14 September 1996 External T.I. 9629825- PHSP CVRGE FOR SAME SEX LIFE PRTNER OF AN EMPLOYEE SECTION 6(1)(a)-- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(a) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 6- Subsection 6(1)- Paragraph 6(1)(a) Following the HRC decision in Moore & Akerstrom, RC has determined that a plan which provides coverage for same sex couples can meet the definition of a "private health services plan". ...

Pages