Search - 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查
Results 181 - 190 of 209 for 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查
Ruling summary
2017 Ruling 2017-0706211R3 - Standard Loss Consolidation -- summary under Paragraph 111(1)(a)
“The borrowing capacity of Parentco and its subsidiaries significantly exceeds the maximum amount... required to complete the Proposed Transactions ….” ...
Ruling summary
2019 Ruling 2019-0822951R3 F - Post-mortem Hybrid Pipeline -- summary under Subsection 84(2)
ACo will partially repay the notes referred to above (other than Note 6, which will not be repaid for a specified number of months following the commencement of the proposed transactions) in order to pay estate income tax and make specific bequests – but not so as to result in a winding-up, discontinuance or reorganization of its business. ...
Ruling summary
2019 Ruling 2018-0757561R3 - Payment in lieu of continued WLRP payments -- summary under Paragraph 6(1)(f)
The payment to a Residual Beneficiary [in 2 above] will be included in the income of a Residual Beneficiary under sections 5 and 6 of the Act in the year of receipt and will be subject to the appropriate income tax withholding …. ...
Ruling summary
2020 Ruling 2019-0819191R3 F - Post-mortem planning - Pipeline -- summary under Subsection 84(2)
Proposed transactions The estate will transfer its Class A and Class E shares of the Corporation to a newly-incorporated corporation (“Newco” – whose voting common shares are held by it) in consideration for Class A common shares and a Newco and two non-interest-bearing notes (“Note 1” and “Note 2”), electing under s. 85(1). ...
Ruling summary
2020 Ruling 2020-0854401R3 - Internal Reorganization 55(3)(a) -- summary under Paragraph 55(3)(a)
Parentco1, 2 and 3 will transfer all of its shares of DC to Holdco on a s. 85(1) rollover basis in consideration for corresponding shares of Holdco – and similarly for Parentco2 and 3. ...
Ruling summary
2021 Ruling 2020-0874851R3 - Post-mortem Hybrid Pipeline -- summary under Subsection 84(2)
The amount of the reductions in stated capital in any given quarter of that year will not exceed 25% of the aggregate paid-up capital of the common shares of Amalco immediately following the amalgamation …. ...
Ruling summary
2017 Ruling 2017-0696791R3 F - Reduction of PUC/capital -- summary under Subparagraph 20(1)(c)(i)
For [such] purposes … the capital of Amalco attributable to the Bco-Newco Note and the XXXXXXXXXX of common shares of the capital stock of Amalco of $XXXXXXXXXX will be considered to be used by Amalco for eligible purposes for the purposes of subparagraph 20(1)(c)(i) provided that the property that will become property of Amalco on the amalgamation of Newco and Cco or the property that will be substituted therefor will be used and will continue to be used by Amalco for the purpose of gaining or producing income from its business. ...
Ruling summary
2021 Ruling 2021-0895071R3 F - Partnership Reorganization -- summary under Subsection 98(3)
Fund LP will transfer the Rollover Shares and Other Investments on a s. 97(2) rollover basis to a new LP (New LP – formed by General Partner LP as general partner and Fund LP as limited partner, and) in consideration for units of New LP, with similar terms to Fund LP, except that distributions are solely in proportion to the number of units held. ...
Ruling summary
2023 Ruling 2022-0958681R3 - Conversion to open-end unit trust -- summary under Paragraph 108(2)(a)
Regarding the notes that could be issued and transferred pursuant to the Right of Redemption, the ruling letter stated: It is expected that the maturity date for [such] Notes … will be XXXXXXXXXX years from the date of issuance, and in any event, will not exceed XXXXXXXXXX years from the date on which they are issued. ...
Ruling summary
2023 Ruling 2022-0958601R3 - Post Butterfly Transactions -- summary under Subsection 248(10)
Accordingly, it was proposed that Aco Amalco would purchase the Xco shares of Eco Amalco (which would be problematic under s. 55(3.1)(c) if this occurred as part of the same series of transactions as the Sequential Butterflies) and that Xco would redeem the shares of Dco Amalco, including through the application of share subscription proceeds received from the holding company for the son of A (which would be problematic under s. 55(3.1)(d), as expanded by s. 55(3.2)(e), if part of the same series) – so that Xco would now mostly be owned by the two A-family companies. ...