St-Onge, TCJ [ORALLY]:—The appeals of Mr Douglas J Mintenko were heard on May 31, 1984, in the City of Regina, Saskatchewan, and it involved sales of land in the appellant’s 1977 and 1981 taxation years.

Brulé, TCJ:—This appeal is brought with respect to the appellant’s 1981 taxation year. In filing his income tax return for the said year the appellant claimed carrying charges as a deduction from income in the amount of $62,293 in relation to mortgage interest

St-Onge, TCJ [ORALLY]:—The appeal of Mr Jan Reiss was heard on July 9, 1984, at the city of Montréal, Québec, and it has to do with money received by the appellant following the expropriation of raw land and later a declaration of abandonment thereof by

Taylor, TCJ:—This is an appeal heard in Belleville, Ontario, on January 8, 1985, against income tax assessments for the years 1977, 1978, 1979 and 1980 in which the Minister of National Revenue treated the appellant as a sole proprietor,

Taylor, TCJ:—These are appeals heard in Toronto, Ontario, on November 21, 1984 against income tax assessments for the years 1979 and 1980 in which the Minister of National Revenue taxed the appellant as an employee, rather than as an independent contractor; and even

Christie, ACJTC:—This appeal relates to the appellant’s 1980 taxation year. The issue is whether she is entitled to deduct certain expenses claimed by her as a commission saleswoman. She was employed under a verbal contract by a corpo- ration to sell

Bonner, TCJ:—This is an appeal from an assessment of income tax for the 1976 taxation year. The sole issue is the value on December 31, 1971, of a parcel of real property in Guelph, Ontario, sold during 1976 by the late Mr Wolfond. The

Taylor, TCJ:—This is an appeal heard in Toronto, Ontario, on December 4, 1984, against an income tax assessment for the year 1981 in which the Minister of National Revenue added to income the proceeds of a Registered Home Ownership Savings Plan

Taylor, TCJ [TRANSLATION]:—This appeal was heard in the city of Montreal on October 18, 1984. The issue is whether the appellant was entitled to deduct certain expenses as “automobile expenses” in the computation of his taxable income.

Rip, TCJ [TRANSLATION]:—The appellant appealed tax assessments for the 1977, 1978 and 1979 taxation years in which the Minister of National Revenue, the respondent, included the profits from the sale of certain buildings as income in the appellant’s income for