Income Tax Severed Letters - 2024-07-03

Ruling

2023 Ruling 2022-0958241R3 - Public Spin-Off Butterfly

Unedited CRA Tags
55(3)(b), 55(3.1)
public company spin-off with s. 51 reversal of new s. 86 common shares
new common shares created on s. 86 reorg then immediately converted under s. 51 back to old common shares
public spinco to elect effective before its shares were listed
FMV of listed shares based on their 5-day VWAP pre-spin-off or post spin-off
pre-butterfly transactions included DC acquiring shares under a plan of arrangement

Principal Issues: Whether the proposed transactions meet the requirements of paragraph 55(3)(b).

Position: Yes.

Reasons: In accordance with law and previous positions.

2023 Ruling 2023-0973911R3 - Loss Consolidation Ruling

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(c), 112, 80, 245
triangular loss consolidation involving circling a daylight loan 4 times, a non-recourse interest-bearing note and a 1 b.p. spread for the preferred dividends
daylight loan circled 4 times
loan in loss-shifting transaction was limited recourse to the Numberco preferred shares, which had a yield 1 b.p. higher

Principal Issues: Whether a particular loss consolidation arrangement is acceptable. In this arrangement, Lossco obtains a daylight loan from a third party and uses the proceeds to make an interest bearing loan to Profitco. Profitco uses the proceeds to invest in preferred shares of an existing corporation, Numberco, which also has a loss carryforward balance. The main issues are whether Lossco would be entitled to apply existing non-capital losses against the interest income received on the loan; and whether Profitco would be entitled to deduct the interest expense paid on the loan and the dividends received on the Numberco Preferred Shares.

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The proposed transactions conform to our requirements for these types of loss consolidation rulings, in this case on the basis that the entities involved are related and affiliated. The proposed transactions would be legally effective and commercially plausible.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

1 May 2024 Internal T.I. 2024-1003041I7 - Ontario Made Manufacturing ITC ("OMMITC")

Unedited CRA Tags
12(1)(x), 13(7.1), Ontario Taxation Act, 2007 97.2(1), 97.2(2), 97.2(4), 97.2(17)

Principal Issues: 1. Whether the full amount of the OMMITC can be claimed for acquisitions of eligible property after March 23, 2023, but before the qualifying corporation's year end.
2. Whether the OMMITC is government assistance which reduces the capital cost of the eligible property acquired for CCA purposes.
3. Whether a qualifying corporation can claim both the OMMITC and the Regional Opportunities Investment Tax Credit ("ROITC") in respect of the same property.
4. Whether a qualifying corporation can claim the OMMITC in respect of property that is being leased to a different taxpayer who is using the property for manufacturing or processing.

Position: 1. Question of fact, but likely yes.
2. Yes.
3. Question of fact, but likely yes.
4. Question of fact, but likely yes.

Reasons: 1. The OMMITC claim is calculated based on a qualifying corporation's eligible expenditures in the taxation year in respect of eligible property. Where a qualifying corporation has an eligible expenditure for the purpose of the OMMITC, the full claim can be made in the taxation year. Prorating the OMMITC is not necessary unless a claim is made in a short taxation year.
2. The OMMITC would generally be considered assistance from a government and the capital cost of such property would be reduced pursuant to subsection 13(7.1) of the Income Tax Act.
3. Where the conditions set out in the definition of "eligible property" in both subsection 97.1(14) and 97.1(17) of the Ontario Taxation Act are met, it is possible that a qualifying corporation could claim both the ROITC and OMMITC in respect of the acquisition of a particular building.
4. Clause 97.2(17)(3)(ii)(B) of the eligible property definition in the Ontario Taxation Act specifically includes property to be leased, in the ordinary course of carrying on a business in Ontario of the qualifying corporation, to a lessee who can reasonably be expected to use the property in Ontario primarily in the manufacturing or processing by the lessee of goods for sale or lease.

21 December 2022 Internal T.I. 2019-0826411I7 - Classification of a Burkina Faso SARL

Unedited CRA Tags
248(1) "corporation"
a Burkina Faso S.A.R.L. is a corporation rather than partnership
a Burkina Faso S.A.R.L. is more akin to a Canadian corporation than partnership

Principal Issues: Is a Burkina Faso SARL a corporation for purposes of the Act?

Position: Yes, a Burkina Faso SARL should generally be considered to be a corporation for purposes of the Act.

Reasons: The characteristics of a Burkina Faso SARL generally compare more to those of a corporation than a partnership.