Words and Phrases - "lending of money"

85
44
76
50
38
31
18
14
72
2
2
32
55
25
38
79
3
76
89
46
15
9
22
2

Royal Bank of Canada v. The King, 2024 TCC 125

foreign interchange fees generated by Canadian credit card issuer related to the granting of credit rather than the making of a loan by it, and were not excluded under s. 1(a)(ii)

When cardholders of credit cards issued by the appellant (RBC) used their cards for purchases from a foreign merchant, RBC would earn an...

The text of this content is paywalled except for the first five days of each month. Subscribe or log in for unrestricted access.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 165 - Subsection 165(1.11) issue should be stated "reasonably" 131
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 141.02 - Subsection 141.02(21) pre-approval of method for allocating inputs between foreign and domestic supplies did not stop CRA from assessing to deny zero-rating of the foreign supplies 202
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 141.02 - Subsection 141.02(31) - Paragraph 141.02(31)(f) s. 141.02(31)(f) is merely confirmatory of normal taxpayer onus 98
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 141.02 - Subsection 141.02(1) - Direct Input expenses of redeeming credit card loyalty points were inextricably linked to the issuer’s extension of credit, and only remotely linked to its earning zero-rated interchange fees 368
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 169 - Subsection 169(1) expenses of redeeming credit card loyalty points were an integral component of the issuer’s extension of credit, and not sufficiently connected to earning interchange fees 181
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Recipient merchant acquirer was the recipient of credit card interchange services even though it was a conduit to the merchant 91
Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Exclusionary provisions exclusionary provisions should be narrowly construed 267
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 301 - Subsection 301(1.2) - Paragraph 301(1.2)(a) taxpayer not precluded from raising an argument that the Minister was bound by an ITC method that it had described in detail in its pleadings 175