Words and Phrases - "accommodation party"
29 November 2016 CTF Roundtable Q. 6, 2016-0669661C6 - 84.1 and the Poulin/Turgeon Case
touchstones for accommodation party
Does the Poulin decision affect CRA’s view of employee buyco arrangements? CRA responded that it could be established that the employee-shareholder and the employee-buyco are acting in concert without separate interests where, for example:
- the employee-buyco assumes no economic risks;
- the employee-buyco does not benefit from acquiring the Opco shares;
- the employee-buyco has no interest other than to enable the employee-shareholder to realize a capital gain and benefit from the capital gains deduction; or
- the employee-buyco has no role independent of the employee-shareholder or the operating corporation.
CRA went on to state that this position is consistent with its discussion at the 2012 Annual Conference.
CRA also indicated respecting the other transaction at issue in the case (the sale by Poulin to Turgeon) that the fact “that Mr. Poulin and Mr. Turgeon structured the transaction so that Mr. Poulin could benefit from the capital gains deduction did not mean that the parties acted in concert without separate interests.”
Words and Phrases
accommodation partyLocations of other summaries | Wordcount | |
---|---|---|
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 118.1 - Subsection 118.1(1) - Total Charitable Gifts - Paragraph (c) - Subparagraph (c)(ii) | right of GREs to carry forward donations for five years | 109 |
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 84.1 - Subsection 84.1(1) | Poulin is consistent with CRA's previous statements on employee buycos | 148 |