Search - considered
Results 731 - 740 of 49295 for considered
FCA (summary)
Emerson v. The Queen, 86 DTC 6184, [1986] 1 CTC 422 (FCA) -- summary under Paragraph 20(1)(c)
" Even if the alleged indirect use could be considered, the income on the preserved assets was less than 10% of the interest on the borrowed funds. ...
TCC (summary)
GF Partnership v. The Queen, 2013 TCC 53, aff'd 2013 FCA 260 -- summary under Subsection 154(1)
The present charges were similar to those considered in Ontario Home Builders' Association v. ...
SCC (summary)
Moldowan v. The Queen, 77 DTC 5213, [1977] CTC 310, [1978] 1 S.C.R. 480 -- summary under Reasonable Expectation of Profit
The following criteria should be considered: the profit and loss experience in past years, the taxpayer's training, the taxpayer's intended course of action, the capability of the venture as capitalized to show a profit after charging capital cost allowance. ...
SCC (summary)
Moldowan v. The Queen, 77 DTC 5213, [1977] CTC 310, [1978] 1 S.C.R. 480 -- summary under Business Source/Reasonable Expectation of Profit
The following criteria should be considered: the profit and loss experience in past years, the taxpayer's training, the taxpayer's intended course of action, the capability of the venture as capitalized to show a profit after charging capital cost allowance. ...
SCC (summary)
Army & Navy Department Stores Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, 53 DTC 1185, [1953] CTC 293, [1953] 2 SCR 496 -- summary under Ownership
Minister of National Revenue, 53 DTC 1185, [1953] CTC 293, [1953] 2 S.C.R. 496-- summary under Ownership Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Ownership the shares of a subsidiary of a corporation are not owned “indirectly” by the shareholders of that corporation Whether a corporation (the Western Company) was related to its two equal corporate shareholders (the Alberta Company and the Saskatchewan Company) under s.36(4)(b)(iii) of the 1948 Act turned, in part, on whether the related individuals owning all the shares of the Alberta Company and the Saskatchewan Company were to be considered as “owning] directly or indirectly” the shares of the Western Company. ...
TCC (summary)
Gill v. The Queen, 2012 DTC 1261 [at at 3764], 2012 TCC 302 -- summary under Interpretation/Definition Provisions
Hogan J. found that the general inclusion of "superannuation or pension benefits" at the beginning of s. 56(1)(a)(i) did not mean that clauses (A)-(C.1) were confined to only amounts that were superannuation or pension benefits- in the present case, clause (C.1) meant that the taxpayer was required to include in income an amount paid in redeeming a foreign retirement arrangement, regardless of whether that amount would normally be considered a superannuation or pension benefit (para. 35). ...
FCA (summary)
Spence v. Canada Revenue Agency, 2012 DTC 5061 [at at 6872], 2012 FCA 58 -- summary under Subsection 220(3.1)
However, we are unable to say that the amount of the penalty, considered against all the relevant circumstances, is such a compelling factor in Mr. ...
Decision summary
BJ Services Co. Canada v. The Queen, [2002] GSTC 124 (TCC) -- summary under Subsection 169(1)
Miller J. found that even if he considered that the primary purpose of Nowsco in incurring these fees was to maximize shareholder value, this purpose did not take the inputs outside the realm of commercial activity for purposes of s. 169 given that a public company will suffer adverse financial consequences if it does not behave as commercially expected, and there was a secondary purpose of maintaining the ongoing viability and economic health of the company. ...
SCC (summary)
Minister of National Revenue v. Freud, 68 DTC 5279, [1968] CTC 438, [1969] SCR 75 -- summary under Inventory
By virtue of this definition, a single operation is to be considered as a business although it is an isolated venture entirely unconnected with the taxpayer's profession or occupation... ...
TCC (summary)
Sénéchal v. The Queen, 2011 DTC 1357 [at at 1997], 2011 TCC 365 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Subparagraph 6(1)(b)(vii)
Even though that municipality results from a merger of three former cities, the meals eaten within it cannot, in my view, be considered to have been eaten away from the municipality where the employer's establishment was located, or away from the metropolitan area where it was located. ...