Search - considered

Results 91 - 100 of 158 for considered
Decision summary

Noble v. Lashbrook, 40 DLR 93, [1918] 1 WWR 918 (Sask CA) -- summary under Investment Contract

A sum is considered certain when it can be made certain. By this, I take it, is meant where it can be determined by computation. ...
Decision summary

Discovery Trust v. MNR, 2015 CanLII 34016 (NL SCTD) -- summary under Subsection 2(1)

However, in each case, Royal Trust…reviewed the Trust document to ensure that the proposed approval was within its authority and then considered whether there were any negative consequences for the beneficiaries" (para. 34). ...
Decision summary

Husky Energy v. Alberta, 2012 DTC 5132 [at at 7262], 2012 ABCA 231 -- summary under Subsection 245(4)

The principle of corporate non-consolidation, set out in para. 97 of Copthorne, requires that each corporation's tax liability be considered independently (para. 47). ...
Decision summary

Zhang v. The Queen, 2015 DTC 5084 [at at 6035], 2015 BCSC 1256 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Zhang as purported additional consideration for the transfer, a joint s. 85(1) election was filed and a rectification order was sought to have the share issue be considered to have occurred on the date of the transfer. ...
Decision summary

Adobe Systems Inc. v. ADIT, W.P.(C) 2384/2013 (Delhi High Court) -- summary under Article 7

Therefore, even if Adobe India is considered to be the Assessee’s PE, the entire income which could be brought in the net of tax in in the hands of the Assesee has already been so taxed in the hands of Adobe India … Thus…the facts in this case do not provide the AO any reason to believe that any part of the Assessee’s income has escaped assessment under the Act. ...
Decision summary

HMRC v National Exhibition Centre Ltd., [2016] BVC 19 (ECJ (8th Chamber)) -- summary under Supply

[I]t is for the referring court to ascertain whether, in the main proceedings, the NEC’s card processing service must be considered for VAT purposes to be a service which is ancillary to the sale of the tickets concerned or as a service ancillary to another principal service which is provided by the NEC to the purchasers of those tickets, which could be the reservation or the delivery of tickets for shows or other events and, therefore, forming with that principal service a single service with the result that that service must share the tax treatment of that principal service (see… Card Protection Plan … Case C‑349/96 …[and] Wojskowa Agencja Mieszkaniowa … Case C-42/14 …). ...
Decision summary

BC Trust v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCSC 209 -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCSC 209-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission no rectification of considered decision not to distribute trust income The petitioner was a personal trust, with another trust (“Alta Trust”) as its sole income and capital beneficiary. ...
Decision summary

SAE Education Ltd v. Revenue and Customs Commissioners, [2017] EWCA Civ 1116 -- summary under University

By the 2009 MOC, students enrolled on the validated courses were to be "considered members of [MU]" but were not entitled to receive university student ID cards and access to university facilities and resources was very limited. ...
Decision summary

Resource Capital Fund IV LP v Commissioner of Taxation, [2018] FCA 41 (Federal Court of Australia), rev'd on various grounds [2019] FCAFC 51 -- summary under Stare Decisis

He then quoted the statement in Re Hetherington (deceased) [1990] Ch 1 that “even where a decision of a point of law in a particular sense was essential to an earlier decision of a superior court, but that superior court merely assumed the correctness of the law on a particular issue, a judge in a later case is not bound to hold that the law is decided in that sense,” and then concluded (at para. 8): It follows from those observations, and from the way in which the issue of RCF III as a taxable entity was considered in RCF III, that the view in RCF III that the partnership in that case was a taxable entity is not binding in these proceedings. ...

Pages