Search - consideration

Filter by Type:

Results 1411 - 1420 of 28946 for consideration
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

27 March 1994 Internal T.I. 9333227 - SHAREHOLDER BENEFIT -- summary under Subsection 85(2.1)

27 March 1994 Internal T.I. 9333227- SHAREHOLDER BENEFIT-- summary under Subsection 85(2.1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 85- Subsection 85(2.1) Where a taxpayer has transferred property to a corporation pursuant to s. 85(1) and has received consideration in excess of the fair market value of the property transferred, s. 85(2.1) in its amended form will operate to apply that provision prior to subsection 84(1). Accordingly, to the extent that the excess consideration exceeds the paid-capital of the shares received by the taxpayer on the transfer, such amount will no longer be taxed as a deemed dividend but will be taxed as a shareholder benefit under s. 15(1). ...
Technical Interpretation - Internal summary

3 March 2004 Internal T.I. 2004-0061781I7 F - Engagement de non-concurrence -- summary under Exempt Receipts/Business

3 March 2004 Internal T.I. 2004-0061781I7 F- Engagement de non-concurrence-- summary under Exempt Receipts/Business Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 9- Exempt Receipts/Business Manrell inapplicable where recipient of non-compete carried on the related business In finding that consideration received by a corporation for a non-compete covenant given by it on the sale of one of its two businesses gave rise to an eligible capital amount, the Directorate indicated that Manrell and Fortino were inapplicable because there, unlike here, the two shareholders who received consideration for a non-compete covenant respecting the sale of their corporations “were not carrying on any business.” ...
Ruling summary

2002 Ruling 2002-0160913 - INTEREST -- summary under Paragraph 20(1)(c)

In order to transfer interest expense from Holdco to the Opco business, Holdco transfers its common shares of Opco to a newly incorporated Canadian subsidiary ("Newco2") in consideration for a promissory note of Newco2 and for share consideration, and Newco2 and Opco then amalgamate. ...
Ruling summary

2002 Ruling 2002-0177163 - Subsection 87(4) - S/H Rights Plan -- summary under Subsection 87(4)

2002 Ruling 2002-0177163- Subsection 87(4)- S/H Rights Plan-- summary under Subsection 87(4) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 87- Subsection 87(4) Rights under a shareholder rights plan of Parent received by shareholders of Target on a triangular amalgamation of Target, a subsidiary of Parent and Parent would not constitute "consideration" for purposes of s. 87(4) given that the rights were of little or no value and given that: "The Amalgamation Agreement will provide that the shares of Parent and Amalco... will be the sole consideration for the exchange. ...
Ruling summary

2015 Ruling 2014-0541261R3 F - Post-Mortem Planning -- summary under Subsection 84(2)

" Holdco will redeem the Class B preferred shares held by Sister, Brother 1 and Brother 2, in consideration for a demand non-interest bearing note, with Holdco making eligible dividend designations. Holdco will transfer its GICs to Investmentco in consideration for Class B non-voting retractable preferred shares, with the sale agreement containing a price adjustment clause, and with a s. 85(1) election made. Holdco will redeem the Class B preferred shares which Newco acquired in 2, in consideration for a demand non-interest bearing note ("Note 2"), with Note 2 containing a price adjustment clause. ...
Ruling summary

2015 Ruling 2015-0605901R3 F - Présomption de gain en capital -- summary under Paragraph 55(3.01)(g)

Holdco 1, Holdco 2, Holdco 3, Opco 3 and Holdco 4 incorporate Holdco and (following the incorporation of Realtyco by Holdco) transfer their shares of Opco to Holdco on a rollover basis under s. 85(1) in consideration for Class A common shares of Holdco. ... Holdco transfers its Class B shares of Opco to Realtyco on a s. 85(1) rollover basis in consideration for Class A common shares of Realtyco. ... Realtyco redeems the Class C shares held by Opco in consideration for Note 2. ...
Decision summary

Attorney General of Canada v. Juliar, 2000 DTC 6589, 50 OR (3d) 728, 2000 CanLII 16883 (Ont CA) -- summary under Rectification & Rescission

Juliar, 2000 DTC 6589, 50 OR (3d) 728, 2000 CanLII 16883 (Ont CA)-- summary under Rectification & Rescission Summary Under Tax Topics- General Concepts- Rectification & Rescission The Court confirmed the decision of the trial judge, to rectify an agreement for the transfer by the appellants of half the shares of a company to a newly-incorporated holding company so as to reflect consideration that was treasury shares of the holding company rather than promissory notes, on the basis of the trial judge's finding that "the true agreement between the parties here was the acquisition of the half interest... in a manner that would not attract immediate liability for income tax" and a finding that the parties would have chosen to receive shares but for the mistaken belief of the advising accountant that the transferred shares had full cost base. ...
TCC (summary)

McKesson Canada Corporation v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1197 [at at 3749], 2014 TCC 266 -- summary under Subsection 247(2)

The Queen, 2014 DTC 1197 [at at 3749], 2014 TCC 266-- summary under Subsection 247(2) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 247- New- Subsection 247(2) highly discounted receivables purchased by non-resident affiliate were not "pig in a poke" Boyle J, after finding in McKesson that the taxpayer had been selling its trade receivable to its immediate Luxembourg parent (MIH) at discounts which were excessive from a transfer pricing perspective, recused himself from consideration of residual issues (respecting costs and the disposition of sealed documents) on the ground that he might no longer be considered to be impartial, as McKesson Canada, in its factum filed with the Federal Court of Appeal, had alleged that he was "untruthful and deceitful" in his reasons, stated "clear untruths" about him and alleged that he was not impartial (numerous paras. beginning at 4). ...
TCC (summary)

Redclay Holdings Ltd. v. The Queen, 96 DTC 1207, [1996] 2 CTC 2347 (TCC) -- summary under Paragraph 20(1)(c)

The Queen, 96 DTC 1207, [1996] 2 CTC 2347 (TCC)-- summary under Paragraph 20(1)(c) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 20- Subsection 20(1)- Paragraph 20(1)(c) interest not payable if contingent cash flow Part of the consideration given by the taxpayer for the purchase by it of a partnership interest was the assumption by it of a portion of the obligations of the vendor under a debenture of the partnership containing a specific covenant to pay interest on the principal amount thereof and on accumulated unpaid interest but containing a stipulation that payments of accumulated interest, current interest and principal were payable only out of 50% of the net cash flow of the partnership. ...
TCC (summary)

Reluxicorp Inc. v. The Queen, [2011] GSTC 138, 2011 TCC 336 -- summary under Exclusive

Accordingly, she affirmed the Minister's assessment, which was made on the basis that the provision by Marriott of franchise rights was an "imported taxable supply" under s. 217, for which the registrant was liable to pay GST on the consideration paid on the basis that 30% of the franchise fees was not eligible for an input tax credit. ...

Pages