Search - consideration
Results 10831 - 10840 of 29002 for consideration
FCTD
Brent Carlson Family Trust v. Canada (National Revenue), 2021 FC 506
Wu, the CRA auditor, in the Minister’s consideration of their First and Second Requests compromised the impartiality of the Minister’s second review and gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. ... There was no common misapprehension as to the parties’ respective rights, only as to the tax consequences of the transactions, and no equitable considerations warranting relief. ... The starting point for the delegate’s consideration of the Second Request was subsection 85(7.1). ...
FCA
Fording Coal Ltd. v. R., [1996] 1 CTC 230
An arrangement is not automatically brought within subsection 245(1) simply because it is motivated by tax considerations. ... Neither are we to contradict what Parliament has chosen to do in the face of a plainly worded section and with the evidence of obvious Departmental consideration and specific legislative amendment. ... Fording acknowledged that tax considerations motivated the seeding transaction, but that fact in and of itself is not enough to support a finding that an undue or artificial reduction of income occurred. ...
FCTD
Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v. Facebook, Inc., 2021 FC 599
The need for speed and efficiency affects the necessity analysis. [55] Third, sometimes the nature and practical exigencies of a proceeding can affect the admissibility of evidence and, in particular, the Court’s evaluation of necessity. [31] In my view, Facebook’s argument lacks consideration for streamlining and efficiency. ... The test for an extension of time requires consideration of the merits of Facebook’s application, which cannot be done during a motion to strike. ... Yet ultimately, Facebook’s request for an extension necessitates a balancing exercise and a consideration of the merits of its claim that do not seem proper in the forum of a motion to strike. ...
BCCA decision
Deputy Sheriff Peter Holmes v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada and the Royal Bank of Canada and the Director of Employment Standards., [1992] 2 CTC 427
., in delivering the opinion of the court after full consideration in Higgins v. ... Justice Gonthier's consideration of the constitutionality of paragraph 88(1)(c) under section 12 of the Charter was specifically limited to prohibitions under only one subparagraph out of the ten sections which could lead to driving prohibitions or to driver's licence suspensions. ... The majority reasons for judgment in the Goltz case require that we confine our consideration of the constitutionality of subsection 223(2) to the precise circumstances of International Electronics Corporation or to a case that could be said to arise through a similar application of subsection 223(2) in ''reasonable hypothetical circumstances" to a corporation which had made a designation in respect of a share or debt obligation of the corporation and so had invoked the necessity to pay Part VIII tax. ...
FCA
1455257 Ontario Inc. v. Canada, 2021 FCA 142
The transferee’s liability is limited to the excess of the fair market value of the property transferred over the fair market value of the consideration given for the property. [3] The prime issue turns on the calculation of the transferor’s tax liability for the year of the transfer and prior years. ... FACTS [8] On January 3, 2003, a non-arm’s length corporation, 1473661 Ontario Inc. (661 or the transferor), transferred to the appellant an amount of $998,460 for no consideration. ... I accept that subsection 160(1) can be seen as harsh in many respects (Canada v. 9101-2310 Québec Inc., 2013 FCA 241 at para. 60), but the liability to which the transferee is exposed under that provision can never exceed the difference between the fair market value of the property transferred and the fair market value of the consideration given. ...
FCTD
Young v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 196, 98 DTC 6028
The Applicant’s request was submitted for consideration by the Appeals Officer after she had been advised by the Applicants’ counsel that no further submissions would be made and she was instructed to proceed with reassessments on the basis of the agreements reached between the parties. ... Little dated November 26, 1996 specifically requested consideration under the fairness package legislation for waiver of interest which was to be reassessed, Ms. ... Little was not asking the Minister to delay consideration of his request for waiver of interest until such time as the new reassessments were issued. ...
TCC
Air Rock Drilling Co. v. R., [1999] 3 CTC 2001, 99 DTC 617
It is highly unlikely that Wallace would have understood that 900,000 shares of CPI were issued in the names of him and Shelva for a total consideration of $621,000 but paid in part by Air Rock ($193,660 in the value of the Polyol equipment plus $200,000 in cash). ... They did not receive any shareholder benefit just because 900,000 CPI shares were issued in their names when more than half of the consideration for those shares came from Air Rock. ... For the purpose of computing the amount of the business investment loss, it does not matter whether the money flowing from Air Rock to CPI (plus the value of Air Rock’s interest in the Polyol equipment) was consideration for shares or an ordinary loan. ...
TCC
Halls v. The Queen, 2022 TCC 14 (Informal Procedure)
She prepared the returns for the tax years here under consideration. She did not testify. ... A comparison is then made with the assets and liabilities of the taxpayer to see if there is any change to net worth for the period of time under consideration. ... He explained that some $6,025.16 deposited in the business account was a transfer of funds and so this was removed from consideration as income. ...
FCA
Hutton v. Sayat, 2022 FCA 30
As this issue has been sufficiently clarified as a preliminary issue it will not require further consideration in this assessment of costs. ... Further to my consideration of the aforementioned facts for this particular claim, I have determined that it is reasonable to allow 37 hours for this claim. ...
FCTD
Heskel S Abed v. Minister of National Revenue, [1978] CTC 5, 78 DTC 6007
The price of the 1954 acquisition was $170,000, the sale of Iny’s share to Abed being made for $1 and other valuable considerations. Saleh Masri and Heskel Abed sold the property by deed executed by the vendors in New York on May 17, 1960 for $1 and other considerations consisting of a balance of price of $643,559.14 payable on May 17, 1965 with interest payable half-yearly at 5 /2% per annum in the interval. ... I am of the view that the same considerations apply in the present case. ...