Search - consideration
Results 181 - 190 of 212 for consideration
FCA (summary)
The King v. MMV Capital Partners Inc., 2023 FCA 234 -- summary under Subsection 111(5)
.$86 million to the respondent, effectively in consideration for secured debt and preferred shares, thereby reducing the equity interest of the five arm’s length holders of 51% of the MMV voting common shares to less than 0.01% and also permitting the use of the respondent’s non-capital losses. ...
FCA (summary)
Vanex Truck Service Ltd. v. Canada, 2001 FCA 159 -- summary under Supply
Malone, J.A. concluded that the appellant was making taxable supplies of insurance, fuel, oil and licences to the owner-operators, stating that "[t]he uncontradicted evidence... is that valid consideration flowed from the owner-operators to Vanex. ...
FCA (summary)
Canada v. Superior Plus Corp., 2015 DTC 5118 [at at 6319], 2015 FCA 241, aff'g 2015 TCC 132 -- summary under Subsection 245(4)
Requested documents included GAAR Committee minutes including comments of individual members (whereas CRA had provided only the final Recommendation of the Committee), and correspondence between CRA and Finance (resulting in the drafting of s. 256(7)(c.1))and between the GAAR Committee and Aggressive Tax Planning, with the questions seeking particulars on the questions posed above and policy considerations brought to bear on this file, and respecting what initially may have been diffidence on the part of Finance as to how to proceed, if at all. ...
FCA (summary)
Zen v. Canada (National Revenue), 2010 DTC 5109 [at at 6979], 2010 FCA 180 -- summary under Subsection 45(2)
These considerations suggest that the amendments to subsection 227(10) may have been intended to have had a substantive effect. ...
FCA (summary)
Novopharm Ltd. v. Canada, 2003 DTC 5195, 2003 FCA 112 -- summary under Paragraph 20(1)(c)
("FMI") with FMI then immediately paying $20 million to Millbank as a prepayment of one year's interest and Millbank utilizing $20 million to pay down the principal of loan owing by it to FMCC to $175 million; Lossco acquired a 99.99% limited partnership in Millbank shortly thereafter (and immediately prior to the first fiscal year end of Millbank) thereby resulting in $20 million of income of Millbank being allocated to it, which eliminated its losses; the 99.99% partnership interest was transferred for nominal consideration by Lossco to an indirect special purpose subsidiary of Lossco ("540") and 540 then was sold to Novopharm; FMCC lent $175 million to Novopharm which used those proceeds to subscribe for shares of 540; 540 made a capital contribution of the same amount to Millbank, which paid off the $175 million loan owing by it to FMCC; a year later after $20 million of interest had accrued on the loan owing by Novopharm to FMCC, FMI repaid the $195 million principal amount owing by it to Millbank, Millbank distributed this sum to its partners (substantially 540), 540 purchased for cancellation most of the shares of Novopharm and 540 for $195 million (giving rise to a deemed dividend of $20 million), and Novopharm used the $195 million to discharge the amount owing by it to FMCC (including the $20 million of interest). ...
FCA (summary)
Novopharm Ltd. v. Canada, 2003 DTC 5195, 2003 FCA 112 -- summary under Subsection 245(4)
("FMI") with FMI then immediately paying $20 million to Millbank as a prepayment of one year's interest and Millbank utilizing $20 million to pay down the principal of loan owing by it to FMCC to $175 million; Lossco acquired a 99.99% limited partnership in Millbank shortly thereafter (and immediately prior to the first fiscal year end of Millbank) thereby resulting in $20 million of income of Millbank being allocated to it, which eliminated its losses; the 99.99% partnership interest was transferred for nominal consideration by Lossco to an indirect special purpose subsidiary of Lossco ("540") and 540 then was sold to Novopharm; FMCC lent $175 million to Novopharm which used those proceeds to subscribe for shares of 540; 540 made a capital contribution of the same amount to Millbank, which paid off the $175 million loan owing by it to FMCC; a year later after $20 million of interest had accrued on the loan owing by Novopharm to FMCC, FMI repaid the $195 million principal amount owing by it to Millbank, Millbank distributed this sum to its partners (substantially 540), 540 purchased for cancellation most of the shares of Novopharm and 540 for $195 million (giving rise to a deemed dividend of $20 million), and Novopharm used the $195 million to discharge the amount owing by it to FMCC (including the $20 million of interest). ...
FCA (summary)
Club Intrawest v. Canada, 2017 FCA 151 -- summary under Supply
Canada, 2017 FCA 151-- summary under Supply Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 123- Subsection 123(1)- Supply service in relation to a cross-border vacation home portfolio split into two (GST-taxable and non-taxable) geographic components The Appellant, a Canadian-resident non-share corporation, most of whose members had time share points which entitled them to book stays at Canadian, U.S. and Mexican resort condos beneficially owned by the corporation, receiving its annual fees from them as consideration for funding the operating costs of the time share program. ...
FCA (summary)
Montminy v. Canada, 2017 FCA 156 -- summary under Paragraph 6204(1)(b)
In noting that broader considerations also supported a finding that the taxpayers’ shares were prescribed shares, he stated (at paras. 55-56, 58): The fact that the appellants were exposed to a risk from the moment when the options were granted and that the shares described under the terms of the plan were in all respects prescribed shares explain why they could have claimed the 50% deduction if they had simply sold their options to Cybectec…. ...
FCA (summary)
Univar Holdco Canada ULC v. Canada, 2017 FCA 207 -- summary under Subsection 245(4)
Webb JA noted (at para. 19) that "If the taxpayer can illustrate that there are other transactions that could have achieved the same result without triggering any tax, then... this would be a relevant consideration in determining whether or not the avoidance transaction is abusive. ...
FCA (summary)
Onenergy Inc. v. Canada, 2018 FCA 54 -- summary under Paragraph 141.1(3)(a)
After stating (at para. 29) that “arguably there is a conflict between subsection 141.01(2) of the Act and subsection 141.1(3) of the Act as it may be difficult to argue that any expense incurred after a registrant has ceased making taxable supplies is made for the purpose of making taxable supplies even though the expenditure is made in connection with the termination of the commercial activity,” he stated (at para. 30) that this conflict should be resolved as follows: In general, subsection 141.01(2) of the Act would provide that a property or service will be deemed to be acquired in the course of commercial activities to the extent that it is acquired for the purpose of making taxable supplies for consideration. ...