Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

Filter by Type:

Results 351 - 360 of 8580 for 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名
TCC

Nguyen v. M.N.R., 2005 TCC 773

., 2005 TCC 773   Docket: 2005-423(EI) BETWEEN: HONG NHAT NGUYEN, Appellant, and   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent.   ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 6th day of December 2005.     "P. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 6th day of December 2005.       "P. ...
Folio Summary

S1-F3-C2 - Principal Residence -- summary under Subsection 40(4)

In 2005, Mr. X died and the house was transferred to a spousal trust for Mrs. ... X had not died (and if he had sold his house in 2005), he could have designated it as his principal residence for any of the years 1995 to 2005 inclusive. ... (The house was, of course, owned by the trust in 2005 in any event.) This means that the years that the trust must include in variable C in the principal residence exemption formula in 2.17- 2.26 are 1995 to 2011 inclusive. ...
TCC

Sturtevant c. La Reine, 2005 TCC 367

La Reine, 2005 TCC 367       Docket: 2002-169(IT)G BETWEEN: LLOYD STURTEVANT, Appellant, and   HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... The Respondent shall be entitled to 80% of her costs.              Signed at Edmundston, New Brunswick, this 16th day of August, 2005.     ... Signed at Edmundston, New Brunswick, this 16th day of August, 2005.     ...
TCC (summary)

Tinhorn Creek Vineyards Ltd. v. The Queen, 2005 TCC 693 -- summary under Paragraph 28(1)(b)

The Queen, 2005 TCC 693-- summary under Paragraph 28(1)(b) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 28- Subsection 28(1)- Paragraph 28(1)(b) winemaking an integral part of viticulture operation The Minister disallowed the taxpayer’s election to use the cash method on the basis that it did not have a farming business but instead was operating a winery with an attached vineyard and was therefore engaged in the business of making and selling wine. In finding that the taxpayer’s winemaking was linked to viticulture and was an integral part of its farming business, Campbell J stated (at paras. 24-26): It is… one of only a few licensed estate wineries, making wine exclusively from the grapes it grows. If in any year unfavourable weather conditions or pests adversely affect the grapes grown in the vineyard, it will directly affect the amount and type of wine that may be produced and hence the profit is directly dependent upon the grape growing activities. The winemaking is so directly tied to the activities in the vineyard that the Appellant cannot go to outside parties to purchase grapes because it produces "estate bottled wine". It is in the vineyard where most of the employees are hired, where most of the equipment is required and used, where the labour expenses are the highest, and where the majority of the acreage is used. ...
TCC

Lapointe v. M.N.R., 2005 TCC 752

., 2005 TCC 752         Docket: 2005-2045(EI) BETWEEN: YVES LAPOINTE, Appellant, and   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respon dent. ... Signed at Edmundst on, New Brunsw ick, this 19th day of Decem ber 2005.       ... The appeal is accordingly dismissed.     Signed at Edmundston, New Brunswick, this 19th day December 2005.       ...
FCA

Canada (Minister of National Revenue) v. Swiftsure Taxi Co. Ltd., 2005 FCA 136

., 2005 FCA 136 Date: 20050414 Docket: A-397-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 136 CORAM:        DESJARDINS J.A. ... Respondent                                   Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on April 13, 2005.                         ... Date: 20050414 Docket: A-397-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 136 CORAM:        DESJARDINS J.A. ...
TCC

Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Co. v. Canada, 2005 DTC 976, 2005 TCC 398

Canada, 2005 DTC 976, 2005 TCC 398 Docket: 2003-3772(IT)G BETWEEN: HEWLETT-PACKARD (CANADA) CO. ... Signed at Toronto, Ontario, this 17 th day of June, 2005. "J. Woods" Woods J. ... Her Majesty the Queen PLACE OF HEARING:                      Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING:                        May 10, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:     The Honourable Justice Judith Woods DATE OF JUDGMENT:                     June 17, 2005 APPEARANCES: Counsel for the Appellant: Joseph Steiner and Scott Wilkie Counsel for the Respondent: Marie-Thérèse Boris COUNSEL OF RECORD:        For the Appellant:                    Name:                              Joseph Steiner and Scott Wilkie                    Firm:                                Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP                                                           Toronto, Ontario        For the Respondent:                     John H. ...
Technical Interpretation - External summary

31 August 2005 External T.I. 2005-0114421E5 F - Frais de garde d'enfants -- summary under Child Care Expense

31 August 2005 External T.I. 2005-0114421E5 F- Frais de garde d'enfants-- summary under Child Care Expense Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 63- Subsection 63(3)- Child Care Expense fees for breach of contract can qualify but not educational fees CRA commented on whether the following categories of expenses incurred by parents at a childcare centre qualified as child care expense: fees paid for child care services yes additional fees paid for child care services generally yes “fees for additional child care (where the parent picks up the child after official daycare hours) are child care expenses provided they satisfy the other requirements of that section” outings outside the daycare no “the purpose of those activities is not to look after the children in order to protect them and thus enable the parents to earn employment income [but instead] is to ensure the development of the children's physical, social and artistic skills” classes and activities given at the daycare; no “the primary purpose of those courses and activities is not to provide childcare but rather to promote the cultural, physical and artistic development of the children.” fees incurred for breach of contract generally, yes 2003-0183697 [indicated] that the phrase ‘an expense incurred...for the purpose of providing… child care services’ found in subsection 63(3) was broad enough to include expenses incurred for the breach of a contract. This conclusion is valid as long as these costs are the result of an undertaking required of the parents in order for the child care to be provided.” interest charges paid by parents who pay their bills late no these are not “charges that are paid to provide childcare but rather to compensate the childcare centre when a parent fails to make a payment by the agreed date” annual dues for parents wishing to be on daycare's Board no fees for sunscreen and insect repellent yes ...
TCC

Gestion Rejean Masson Inc. v. M.N.R., 2005 TCC 445

., 2005 TCC 445       Docket: 2004-3105(EI) BETWEEN: GESTION RÉJEAN MASSON INC., Appellant, and   THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent, and   CHANTAL MASSON, JACINTHE MASSON, ANDRÉ ST-PIERRE, Interveners. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 15th day of July 2005.   "Louise Lamarre Proulx" Lamarre Proulx J.     ...   [26]     Consequently, the appeal is allowed.     Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 15th day of July 2005.     ...
Technical Interpretation - External

21 January 2008 External T.I. 2007-0227531E5 F - GRIP / GRIP Addition for 2006

Au cours des années 2001 à 2005, Société A n'a eu aucun autre revenu que les dividendes imposables de 1 500 000 $ reçus de Société C. Au cours de l'année 2005, Société A a versé un dividende imposable de 1 500 000 $ à Société B. ... Un premier dividende de 1 600 000 $ a été reçu au cours de l'année 2004 et un second de 1 500 000 $ a été reçu au cours de l'année 2005. ...

Pages