Search - 2005年 抽纸品牌 质量排名

The Court upheld the open court principle as protected by the constitutional right to freedom of expression and as an essential feature of our democracy, even though “public scrutiny … can be the source of inconvenience and even embarrassment to those who feel that their engagement in the justice system brings intrusion into their private lives.” ... Only where all three of these prerequisites have been met can a discretionary limit on openness — for example, a sealing order, a publication ban, an order excluding the public from a hearing, or a redaction order — properly be ordered. ... Ontario, 2005 SCC 41, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 188, at paras. 7 and 22). Kaiser J dismissed the appeal, finding (at para. 107}: The conclusion that the Trustees have failed to establish a serious risk to an important public interest ends the analysis. … Words and Phrases open court presumption ...

He made cash settlement payments under the contract in 2004, 2005 and 2006 totalling approximately $10 million (which he fully deducted as being on income account), and the contract was terminated on March 29, 2006. ... Gains and losses arising from hedging derivative contracts take on the character of the underlying asset, liability or transaction being hedged …. ... Purpose is ascertained objectively (Ludco …). … As the cases demonstrate, the primary source of ascertaining a derivative contract’s purpose is the linkage between the derivative contract and any underlying asset, liability or transaction purportedly hedged. ...