Search - 阿里拍卖 司法拍卖

Before concluding that (by virtue of the exception in s. 67.1(2)(c) s. 67.1(1) did not limit the deduction to the taxpayer for its incurring of the meal allowances and that such limitation instead applied to the purchasers respecting the cumulative amount of the meal allowances referred to in the interim invoice note, CRA indicated: The expression “amount … compensated” in s. 67.1(2)(c) was used in the sense of “paid or reimbursed”. ...

. … [I]n... Kaiser... 91 DTC 1057...the taxpayer tried [unsuccessfully] to convince the Tax Court that foreign taxes paid on employment income were deductible under subsection 20(12).... ...

. … Justice L'Heureux-Dubé seemed to suggest that Mara Properties stands for the proposition that subsection 88(1) deems the parent to have received property of the same character from its subsidiary upon the subsidiary's wind-up. ...

. … If the total of all the decreases exceeds the total of all the increases to the UCC of a class as of the end of a taxation year, subsection 13(1) provides that this excess shall be included in computing the taxpayer's income for the year. ...

(a)(i) of the "earnings" definition) – without duplication of the adjustments in 1 and 2. ...

" This could be the case given that the payment of the dividends may have fully accessed any available exempt surplus of CCo, whereas if there instead had been a sale of CCo shares to NR1 at a gain followed by a s. 93(1) election, the amount of exempt surplus which was accessed under the operation of Regs. 5902(1) and 5901 could be more limited – which would result in pre-acquisition surplus dividends grinding basis under s. 92(2) which, in turn, would result in a taxable capital gain which was foreign accrual property income. ...

. … If it is instead established on the facts that the taxpayer did not ordinarily reside at Location 2 before ordinarily residing at Location 3…[e]xpenses related to the sale of the residence at Location 1 would be considered expenses of the move from Location 1 to Location 3…. ...

…[T]he CRA should not accept the adjustment request … as it would result in changes to the tax assessment for Year 1, which is a statute-barred year. ...

. … Above, it was noted that transactions that fall within sections 51, 86, 87 or 85.1 are carved out of a “merger” in subparagraph 40(3.5)(c)(i). ...

For the purposes of subparagraph 81(1)(h)(i), we are of the view that the children's special allowance [so] paid … is not an amount of family allowance under the LAF and the payment of such an allowance would not preclude the exemption from the social assistance benefit that would otherwise qualify pursuant to paragraph 81(1)(h). ...