Search - 阿里拍卖 司法拍卖

Results 13291 - 13300 of 13547 for 阿里拍卖 司法拍卖
TCC

Leon Broitman and Len’s Clothing and Furniture Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 2 CTC 2283, 86 DTC 1711

On busy days she went to the store for longer periods Friday, Saturday, holidays and fall fair days. ...
TCC

Edwards Fine Foods Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 2 CTC 2447, 86 DTC 1815

Until the judgment of the Federal Court Trial Division in Mother's Pizza Parlour is reversed or qualified in some significant way by the Federal Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court of Canada, I believe that the proper course for me to adopt is to accept and apply it whenever the occasion arises. ...
TCC

Hackiman Lakha v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 1 CTC 2001

Appeal allowed. 1 *The parties agreed that the average rate of exchange in 1977 and 1978 was $0.3862 for G$1 in 1977 and $0.4375 for G$1 in 1978. 2 tReference to $ is in Canadian currency. 3 *lt was not clear from the evidence whether the amount of $14,000 was in the currency of Canada or Guyana. ...
TCC

Denis Verrier v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 1 CTC 2018, 86 DTC 1027

. where the taxpayer was employed in the year in connection with the selling of property or negotiating of contracts for his employer, and (i) under the contract of employment was required to pay his own expenses, (ii) was ordinarily required to carry on the duties of his employment away from his employer's place of business, (iii) was remunerated in whole or part by commissions or other similar amounts fixed by reference to the volume of the sales made or the contracts negotiated, and (iv) was not in receipt of an allowance for travelling expenses in respect of the taxation year that was, by virtue of subparagraph 6(1)(b)(v), not included in computing his income, amounts expended by him in the year for the purpose of earning the income from the employment (not exceeding the commissions or other similar amounts fixed as aforesaid received by him in the year) to the extent that such amounts were not (v) outlays, losses or replacements of capital or payments on account of capital, except as described in paragraph (j), or (vi) outlays or expenses that would, by virtue of paragraph 18(1)(l), not be deductible in computing the taxpayer's income for the year if the employment were a business carried on by him. ...
TCC

Claude Rioux v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 1 CTC 2218, 86 DTC 1177

The appellant maintained that this paragraph was based on the Beauregard decision of the Federal Court Trial Division, [1981] 2 F.C. 543. ...
TCC

Doreen Isabelle Parkes, Executrix of the Estate of the Late William R. Parkes, Deceased v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 1 CTC 2262, 86 DTC 1214

“Indefeasibly vested” statute providing for exemptions from estate tax with respect to net estate, not exceeding specified amounts, transferred to and “indefeasibly vested” in surviving spouse or children of decedent, used quoted phrase as meaning an absolute vesting or a vesting with no strings attached as of date of decedent's death. ...
TCC

I.S.E. Canadian Finance Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1986] 1 CTC 2473, 86 DTC 1344 (TCC)

As stated in Dominion Steel & Coal Corporation Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, 57 D.T.C. 147 at page 150 (T.A.B.),... the line that divides capital from income in exchange profits is the same as that which divides capital and income in any other sense. ...
TCC

King Edward Hotel (Calgary) LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1985] 1 CTC 2002, 85 DTC 124

Alessio had no previous experience in the hotel business nor did Jackson, yet he sold his insulation business and his residence in order to obtain the capital to purchase the Didsbury. ...
TCC

George Jellaczyc v. Minister of National Revenue, [1985] 1 CTC 2158, 85 DTC 184

In considering the circumstances in which a transaction might be an “adventure in the nature of trade” Thorson, P stated at 210, 211 [1137]: But “trade” is not the same thing as “an adventure in the nature of trade” and a transaction might well be the latter without being the former or constituting its maker a “trader”. “... ...
TCC

Banksia Investments Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1984] CTC 2139, 84 DTC 1060

Appeal dismissed 1 * Checkerboarding, as I understand it, was a method to avoid certain provisions of the Planning Act of Ontario by creating lots beneficially owned by one person but legally by several and in which no one legal owner owned contiguous lots. ...

Pages