Search - 辐射监测仪 校准
Results 22931 - 22940 of 23525 for 辐射监测仪 校准
TCC
Lomas v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 2462
At page 6013, Linden J.A. stated: …] otherwise agree that the Moldowan test should be applied sparingly where a taxpayer’s ‘business judgment’ is involved, where no personal element is in evidence, and where the extent of the deductions claimed are not on their face questionable. ...
TCC
Nagasaka v. R., [1998] 1 CTC 3047
. /?. [4] For the purpose of computing her income under section 3 of the Income Tax Act, a taxpayer is entitled to deduct losses which derive from a business or property which is a source of income; in order for a business or property to be a source of income it must either produce a profit, or at least the taxpayer must have a reasonable expectation of profit from it. ...
OntCtGD decision
Canada (Attorney General) v. Ontario (Attorney General), [1998] 3 CTC 41, 99 DTC 5739
Canada (Director of Investigation & Research) (1997), 103 O.A.C. 310 (Ont. ...
FCTD
Gadbois v. Transport H. Cordeau Inc., [1998] 3 CTC 68
., granted advances totalling some $63,000 to Cordeau between February and May 1996. (...)? ...
FCA
O’neill Motors Ltd. v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 385, [1998] DTC 6424
C.A.). 4 [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613 (S.C.C.). 5 ^Reasons for Judgment, at 18. 6 /?. ...
BCSC decision
Jarman v. Canada, [1998] 3 CTC 398
John & Murray Motors Ltd. (1979), 12 B.C.L.R. 155 (B.C. C.A.). I do not understand Revenue Canada to disagree with the proposition that “due diligence” may constitute a defence. ...
TCC
Makowetski v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2271
Appellant’s counsel referred to Courtney & Fairbairn Ltd. v. Tolaini Brothers (Hotels) Ltd., [1975] 1 All E.R. 716 (Eng. ...
TCC
McRae v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2283
. /?., [1992] 1 S.C.R. 877 (S.C.C.) the Supreme Court of Canada had occasion to consider the situs of unemployment insurance benefits for purposes of the section 87 exemption. ...
TCC
Marchand v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 2340
In making these assessments the Minister assumed the facts set out in Paragraph 4 of the Reply to the Notice of Appeal, which read as follows: [TRANSLATION] (a) the deduction for contribution to an RRSP in the 1993 taxation year was allowed at the maximum permitted by the Income Tax Act (“the Act”) and was calculated as follows: 1993 taxation year Calculation of 1992 earned income: Income $36,186 Less: union dues (110) Subtotal 36,076 Plus: R.R.Q. disability pension 8,368 farming profit 1,658 Subtotal 46,102 Less: rental loss (1,151) Total 44,951 1993 taxation year Rate x 18% RRSP deductible before adjustment 8,091 Less: 1992 pension adjustment (6,762) Maximum amount deductible for RRSP $ 1,329 in 1993 (b) the deduction for contribution to an RRSP in 1994 taxation year was allowed at the maximum permitted by the Act and was calculated as follows: 1994 taxation year Calculation of 1994 earned income: Income $37,119 Less: union dues (115) Subtotal 37,004 Plus: R.R.Q. disability pension 8,519 Subtotal 45,523 Less: rental loss (903) farming loss (214) Total 44,406 Rate x 18% RRSP deductible before adjustment 7,993 Less: 1993 pension adjustment (6,939) Maximum amount deductible for RRSP $1,054 in 1994 (c) on June 25, 1996 the Minister affirmed the appellant’s income tax assessments for each of the 1993 and 1994 taxation years. ...
TCC
Chaudhry v. R., [1999] 2 CTC 2560
The next two items are amounts of $528.00 and $ 1,000.00, supported by cancelled cheques written to J.S. ...