Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

Filter by Type:

Results 821 - 830 of 79029 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
Decision summary

Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Rowntree & Co. Ltd., [1948] 1 All ER 482 (CA) -- summary under Paragraph 20(1)(c)

Rowntree & Co. Ltd., [1948] 1 All ER 482 (CA)-- summary under Paragraph 20(1)(c) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 20- Subsection 20(1)- Paragraph 20(1)(c) The taxpayer drew sight bills on an acceptance house which, after accepting the bills, discounted them in the market as agent for the taxpayer and remitted the proceeds to the taxpayer. ...
FCTD (summary)

Peter Cundill & Associates Ltd. v. The Queen, 91 DTC 5085, [1991] 1 CTC 197 (FCTD), aff'd 91 DTC 5543 (FCA) -- summary under Noscitur a Sociis

Peter Cundill & Associates Ltd. v. The Queen, 91 DTC 5085, [1991] 1 CTC 197 (FCTD), aff'd 91 DTC 5543 (FCA)-- summary under Noscitur a Sociis Summary Under Tax Topics- Statutory Interpretation- Noscitur a Sociis With respect to a submission that the more general word "management" in the phrase "management or administration fee" in s. 212(1)(a) should be coloured by the word "administration", Cullen J. stated (p. 5089): "Such an approach fails to give sufficient weight to the fact that the words 'management' and 'administration' are divided by the disjunctive 'or', which tends to suggest that the words were intended to bear separate meanings. ...
FCTD (summary)

The Queen v. W. Ralston & Co., 96 DTC 6488, [1996] 3 CTC 346 (FCTD) -- summary under Paragraph 256(1)(a)

Ralston & Co., 96 DTC 6488, [1996] 3 CTC 346 (FCTD)-- summary under Paragraph 256(1)(a) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 256- Subsection 256(1)- Paragraph 256(1)(a) 100 voting common shares of the taxpayer were held by members of the Cohen family, and the 100 voting preferred shares of the taxpayer were held as to 50 shares by the son of the Cohen's solicitor as to the other 50 preferred shares, by the solicitor's secretary. ...
Decision summary

Maidment v. Kibby & Anor., [1993] BTC 291 (D) -- summary under Paragraph 111(5)(a)

Kibby & Anor., [1993] BTC 291 (D)-- summary under Paragraph 111(5)(a) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 111- Subsection 111(5)- Paragraph 111(5)(a) Vice-Chancellor Nicholls affirmed the finding of the Commissioner that the purchase as a going concern by the taxpayers of an existing fish and chip shop business in a village five miles away, followed by the continued conduct of that business from the same premises but with substantial variations in the mode of conduct thereof should be characterized as an expansion by the taxpayers of their own fish and chip business into the new premises, rather than as a continuation of the trade carried on by the former owner at the new premises. ...
Decision summary

Re McGruer & Clark Ltd (1976), 13 OR (2d) 385 (S.C.O.) -- summary under Subparagraph 212(1)(b)(ii)

Re McGruer & Clark Ltd (1976), 13 OR (2d) 385 (S.C.O.)-- summary under Subparagraph 212(1)(b)(ii) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 212- Subsection 212(1)- Paragraph 212(1)(b)- Subparagraph 212(1)(b)(ii) The Ontario Development Corporation was a Crown agency within the meaning of s. 1 of the Crown Agency Act (Ontario) given that: the Crown owned all its shares; the Crown appointed all its directors, the permanent staff of the corporation were members of the public service; and the corporation was subject to the control of the Crown in the most fundamental aspects of its financial structure and operation. ...
FCA (summary)

The Queen v. B.B. Fast & Sons Distributors, 86 DTC 6106, [1986] 1 CTC 299 (FCA) -- summary under Paragraph 256(1)(e)

Fast & Sons Distributors, 86 DTC 6106, [1986] 1 CTC 299 (FCA)-- summary under Paragraph 256(1)(e) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 256- Subsection 256(1)- Paragraph 256(1)(e) William Fast and his wife each owned 50% of the shares of one corporation ("Willmar"), and William Fast and his 4 siblings each owned 20% of the shares of the taxpayer. ...
FCTD (summary)

Dupont Roofing & Sheet Metal Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2011 DTC 5031 [at at 5614], 2011 FC 160 -- summary under Subsection 223(3)

Dupont Roofing & Sheet Metal Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), 2011 DTC 5031 [at at 5614], 2011 FC 160-- summary under Subsection 223(3) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 223- Subsection 223(3) In finding that the taxpayer's tax debt had been properly certified, Mosley J. found that the Minister had mailed the notice of assessment but went on to note, in the alternative, that a notice of assessment was not actually required. ...
TCC (summary)

Coopers & Lybrand Limitéé v. MNR, 94 D.T.C 1626, [1994] 2 CTC 2244 (TCC) -- summary under Remuneration

Coopers & Lybrand Limitéé v. MNR, 94 D.T.C 1626, [1994] 2 CTC 2244 (TCC)-- summary under Remuneration Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Regulations- Regulation 100- Subsection 100(1)- Remuneration The appellant took possession on November 4, 1981 of the business of a debtor and, with the banks' authorization, paid the net amount of the employees' back wages pursuant to the usual payroll procedures of the debtor (including the preparation of payroll slips showing the deduction of source deductions). ...
Decision summary

The Queen v. Ken & Ray's Collins Bay Supermarket Ltd., 75 DTC 5346, [1975] CTC 504 (FCTD) -- summary under Incurring of Expense

Ken & Ray's Collins Bay Supermarket Ltd., 75 DTC 5346, [1975] CTC 504 (FCTD)-- summary under Incurring of Expense Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 18- Subsection 18(1)- Paragraph 18(1)(a)- Incurring of Expense gratuitous bonus In respect of its 1969 and 1970 taxation years the taxpayer deducted management bonuses whose quantum was not ascertained until after the end of the taxation year and which, due in part to a reduction in the taxpayer's profitability, were not paid. ...
Decision summary

The Queen v. Ken & Ray's Collins Bay Supermarket Ltd., 75 DTC 5346, [1975] CTC 504 (FCTD) -- summary under Paragraph 18(1)(e)

Ken & Ray's Collins Bay Supermarket Ltd., 75 DTC 5346, [1975] CTC 504 (FCTD)-- summary under Paragraph 18(1)(e) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 18- Subsection 18(1)- Paragraph 18(1)(e) Kerr, J. indicated, obiter, that s. 18(1)(e) would have applied to unpaid bonuses which the taxpayer sought to deduct: "When the decision to pay bonuses was taken in the fall of 1968 the amount that would be paid was uncertain, although a range of $25,000 to $30,000 was decided, and payment was contingent on necessary funds being available". ...

Pages