Search - 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致

Results 13081 - 13090 of 13526 for 报销 发票日期 消费日期不一致
TCC

Elizabeth Hruska v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1994] 2 CTC 2361

If she did not get a bank account in the first eight months of 1990, how did she go about paying these extraordinary expenses that amount to I will not say $22,000 because that includes depreciation the cash outlays come to $15,793. ...
TCC

Ernest Morgan Davis v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1995] 1 CTC 2256

Davis pointed out that the 1988 statements included, under current assets, a note receivable Malcan Packaging for $97,750 and under current liabilities the sum of $116,571.32 as advances from a director. ... Both of these returns reported nil income, that its major business activity was inactive no assets and that Mr. ...
TCC

Pierre Duquette, Gérard Grenon and Louis Geoffroy v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1995] 1 CTC 2264

Campbell & Co. Inc. in connection with a company known in the pleadings as "Coral"; 3. the background, composition, function, activities, organization and income of ARMC and ARMC No. 2; 4. the prosecutions brought by the U.S. government against Allen F. ... Campbell & Co. Inc. and the knowledge that certain persons may have concerning the bringing of those prosecutions; 5. the function and activities of Coral, particularly in Brazil, the nature and location of its operations and where its premises are located; 6. the transactions and arrangements entered into or concluded between ARMC and ARMC No. 2 and Coral regarding, in particular, research work and the function of the promoters of ARMC and ARMC No. 2; 7. the use of Brazilian currency by Coral and by the promoters and members of ARMC and ARMC No. 2, the characteristics of that currency, the anticipated depreciation of the currency, the measures taken by the Brazilian government regarding it and the business practices followed in the transactions conducted in the currency; 8. the "hedge agreement" between Coral, ARMC and ARMC No. 2 and the protection provided to ARMC and ARMC No. 2; 9. the nature and value of the notes signed by ARMC and ARMC No. 2 in favour of Coral and the assignment of those notes to a trustee, M.R.T. ...
TCC

Carole Ann Walker v. Her Majesty the Queen and Roy Stephen Shattock, [1995] 1 CTC 2408

EQUALIZING PAYMENT NET FAMILY PROPERTY The husband and the wife agree that during their marriage certain items of property were acquired by both of them and that those items of property were used by the family without regard to the identity of the person acquiring the property. ... Notwithstanding section 1, I cannot ignore the fact that section 14 is preceded by the heading "Equalizing Payment Net Family Property"; and the phrase "net family property" is defined in section 4 of the F.L.A. ...
TCC

Dr. Valcav Hyrman v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1995] 1 CTC 2772, 95 DTC 550

The returns were prepared by a firm of chartered accountants, Tierney & White, who had prepared unaudited financial statements for 1987. ... All the financial statements and tax returns were prepared by Tierney & White. ...
TCC

Jane D. Taylor v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 1 CTC 2234

It doesn't seem to it’s not a drug that makes a dramatic change. ... If I’m out and I have to do a great deal of walking, I at the Stampede and Expo I I visited, I used a wheelchair when I was there. ...
TCC

Estate of the Late Kelly Waxman v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1994] 1 CTC 2817, 94 DTC 1216

A copy of the invoice from the law firm of Berger & Winston dated July 15, 1987 is enclosed as (Exhibit B). ... Following various exchanges of letters between the appellant’s agents and those of the respondent, a letter was sent by the agents of the respondent to the appellant’s accountant informing him that the deduction of the legal fees incurred by the appellant would not be allowed for the 1987 and 1988 taxation years because insufficient information had been provided (Exhibit A-8 Letter dated August 17, 1989, from the audit division to the Estate of Kelly Waxman, c/o Richard Venor). ...
TCC

Elizabeth Hruska v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1994] 1 CTC 2823

If she did not get a bank account in the first eight months of 1990, how did she go about paying these extraordinary expenses that amount to I will not say $22,000 because that includes depreciation the cash outlays come to $15,793. ...
TCC

Ghislaine Tremblay v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1993] 2 CTC 2184

Subsection 34(6) reads as follows: (6) Section 56 of the said Act is further amended by adding thereto, immediately after subsection (11) thereof, the following subsection: (12) Subject to subsections 56.1(2) and 60.1(2), for the purposes of paragraphs (1)(b), (c) and (c.1) (hereinafter in this subsection referred to as the "former paragraphs”) and 60(b), (c) and (c.1) (hereinafter in this subsection referred to as the “latter paragraphs"), allowance” does not include any amount that is received by a person, referred to in the former paragraphs as "the taxpayer" and in the latter paragraphs as "the recipient", unless that person has discretion as to the use of the amount. ... In Gagnon, supra, the Supreme Court of Canada thus held that the monthly payments in question made by the taxpayer were allowances” within the meaning of paragraph 60(b) of the Income Tax Act. ...
TCC

Ann D. Sparkes v. Her Majesty the Queen (Informal Procedure), [1993] 2 CTC 3162

Accordingly, A.V.C.s are excluded from the ambit of the rules in paragraph 147.2(4)(b) and (c) concerning service before 1990 i.e. they are not deductible thereunder. ... The 18 per cent contribution limit applies (directly or indirectly) to all types of registered retirement income vehicles (that is, R.P.P.s, deferred profit sharing plans [D.P.S.P.s], and R.R.S.P.s). ...

Pages