Search - 微信撤回和删除的区别 官方

After March 21, 2016, the object, spirit and purpose of the Reduction Provision, as amended, was to refer to the adjusted cost basis of a policyholder’s interest in the particular policy in order to determine the amount that could be added to the capital dividend account of a corporate beneficiary, even where that beneficiary was not the policyholder. ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ ...

. … The respondent did not introduce any evidence to rebut the accountant’s account of the events. ...

. … …The facts in Schwartz [for losses arising from the retraction of an employment offer] are too different for the decision to be meaningful to the present inquiry. ...

. … This result would be extremely difficult for the Canada Revenue Agency to audit. ...

. … ...

In finding that ss. 128.1(1)(b) and (c) did not apply, Smith J stated (at para. 35): [T]he effective date upon which the Appellant became a resident of Canada … was when the Canadian dairy farm was acquired on June 15, 1998. ...

The CRA has already allowed home office expenses of $1,763 for 2012 and $2,333 for 2013 as well as office supplies in the amount of $361.00 pursuant to subsection 18(2) …. ...

On the basis of the construction invoices and photos and on the basis of giving the taxpayer the benefit of the doubt by treating “substantially all … as indicating no less than 90%” (para 11), Russell found that the rebate application was submitted more than two years after substantial completion of the renovation project, thus rendering per s. 256(3)(a)(iii) ETA the rebate as not available. ...

The evidence has established that JA is seriously lacking in ability to engage in social interactions … substantially all of the time. ...

. … I cannot find that the loan was repaid before the end of Steel's 1988 taxation year. ...