Search - 哈尔滨到北京 公里数

Results 851 - 860 of 869 for 哈尔滨到北京 公里数
EC decision

Andrew Babiy v. Minister of National Revenue, [1969] CTC 693, 70 DTC 6013

Bieleny therefore gave to the appellant a first mortgage on the identical terms that he was to have had from the mortgage company, that is, a first mortgage in the face amount of $27,000 being the loan of $20,000 plus a premium of $7,000 at 7 % interest repayable in monthly instalments. ...
EC decision

Minister of National Revenue v. Clement’s Drug Store (Brandon) Limited, [1968] CTC 53, 68 DTC 5053

The statutory rule outlined in Section 20(6) of the Income Tax Act quoted above applies only where an amount can reasonably be regarded as being in part consideration for disposition of depreciable property of a taxpayer of a prescribed class and as being in part consideration for something else’’. ...
EC decision

Minister of National Revenue v. Dorila Trottier, [1967] CTC 28, 67 DTC 5029

Hawkins & Gratton, Barristers and Solicitors, a copy of which direction is attached hereto as Schedule C. 6. ...
EC decision

Minister of National Revenue v. Wilbrod Bherer, [1967] CTC 272, 67 DTC 5186

Aux termes de l’article 139(1) (e), le mot entreprise”, dans ce statut, ‘‘comprend une profession”, et selon l’article 139(1) (ab), le mot ‘‘charge’’ signifie “le poste d’un particulier lui donnant droit à un traitement ou rémunération déterminée ou constatable’’ et l’expression “fonctionnaire” signifie ‘‘une personne détenant une telle charge’’. ...
EC decision

J. Mastai Ravary v. Minister of National Revenue, [1960] CTC 228, 60 DTC 1157

Thorson, Président de cette Cour, décrit ainsi la position des parties dans les causes en appel des décisions de la Commission d’Appel de l’Impôt sur le Revenu (p. 207, in fine): “... ...
EC decision

Harvey Clarke Smith v. Minister of National Revenue, [1960] CTC 391, 60 DTC 1282

’?’’ The test is not always easy to apply, for there is no single criterion by which the question may be resolved, and cases frequently arise in which there are circumstances or facts pointing to both conclusions. ...
EC decision

Hersch Fogel v. Minister of National Revenue, [1959] CTC 227, 59 DTC 1182

It is quite true that they preferred not to sell them if a sale could be avoided, but the statement in para. 11 of the case is quite plain, that the possibility of the sale of the foreign patents or rights has always been contemplated by the appellant company in respect of such interest as it possessed in the foreign patents.’ ...
EC decision

Minister of National Revenue v. Joseph A. Simard, [1962] CTC 310, 62 DTC 1192

Selon ces articles lorsqu’un contribuable a signifié un avis d’opposition à une cotisation, prévu 2‘1 l’article 58, il peut interjeter un appel contre la cotisation 2‘1 la Commission d’appel de l’impôt ou 2‘1 cette Cour en suivant les conditions prescrites par l’article 59, c’est-à-dire (a) après que le Ministre a ratifié la cotisation ou procédé 2‘1 une nouvelle cotisation, ou (b) après l’expiration des cent quatre-vingt jours qui suivent la signification de l’avis d’opposition sans que le Ministre ait notifié au contribuable le fait qu’il a annulé ou ratifié la cotisation ou procédé 2‘1 une nouvelle cotisation.” ...
EC decision

Edwin L. Schujahn v. Minister of National Revenue, [1962] CTC 364, 62 DTC 1225

The appellant upon hearing of his transfer back to Minneapolis contacted, in July 1957, a firm of real estate agents in Toronto, Key & Penn, and told them to try to sell his house. ...
EC decision

Harry Sheftel, Benjamin Sheftel an Leopold Sheftel v. Minister of National Revenue, [1965] CTC 201, 65 DTC 5133

On April 25, 1958 the city replied enclosing a ‘c of the decision of the Technical Planning Board stating that the request to operate a feed lot on the premises was considered and refused because the property had been classified on the interim zoning guide as ‘‘ Agricultural future residential’’ which did not permit the development of feed lots and that feed lots were only permitted in heavy industrial areas under special The appeal procedure from such refusal was explained but no appeal was launched because, as Harry Sheftel testified, hé considered an appeal to be futile having been so informed by a civic official who also indicated to Harry Sheftel that he would vigorously oppose such an appeal. conditions. ...

Pages