Search - 哈尔滨到北京 公里数

. … [W]hen a foreign trust grants funds to other organizations…the recipient organization would have to be considered “charitable” according to Canadian common law.... ...

.), also owned 100% by them, which used the land exclusively in its farming business for the first 11 of the 20 years that the land was held by the partnership – but, then, apparently ceased operations. ...

. … Thus, subsection 55(2) would not apply in the situation described above to the extent that none of the occurrences set out in subparagraphs 55(3)(a)(i) to 55(3)(a)(v) occurred as part of a transaction or event or a series of transactions or events as a part of which the dividend was received. ...

. … [I]t is a question of fact what portion of the total U.S. income tax paid by Usco1 under the Code for its taxation year ended December 31, 1997 is attributable to its share of the income of US LLC for that year. ...

. … In the described situation, although each of the building's units was subject to a change of use in Year 11, the relation between the use regularly made by the taxpayer of the property for gaining or producing income and the use regularly made of the property for other purposes did not change during the year. ...

. … The CRA's longstanding position is instead to reduce the safe income on hand by every dollar of expenses that contributed to the loss sustained by the corporation on the grounds that such income is no longer on hand to contribute to the unrealized capital gain on a share. ...

After referencing the position in IT-160R3, para. 9, that a controlling shareholder generally will be considered to have received a benefit qua shareholder where “there is extensive use of the aircraft for personal purposes by the shareholder-employee or … relatives or friends,” CRA stated: [T]he benefit arising from the person's use of the aircraft by the corporation's founder-president should be based on the price of a regular first class ticket for a scheduled flight to the same destination, as the founder-president received the benefit as an employee of the corporation. ...

. … In the case where each of the co-owners has the exclusive right to live in his or her own unit, the value of their undivided share must take into account at the same time the exercise by each of them of the exclusive use and enjoyment of their unit, which necessarily includes the right to the use of the common parts of the building, and the prohibition on the use of the unit occupied by the other co-owner. ...

[T]he deductions [under s. 153(1)(j)] are … made from the lump sum payment and designated as being for the account of the person receiving the amount, being the RRSP annuitant. ...

. … [W]here a trustee or an insurance company pays benefits to an employee from a wage-loss replacement plan over which the employer does not exercise control, or where the employer does not determine eligibility for benefits, the trustee or insurance company is required to report the benefit amounts on a T4A information slip. ...